"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Timings

“The judge, in summing up, was to direct the jury that they should consider the loud crashing noises reported by neighbours as possibly coming from “clumsy cats,” even though this suggestion was not raised during the trial.

How would Sandra Lean know whether or not “clumsy cats” were mentioned during the trial?

Sandra didn’t attend killer Simon Hall’s trial!

And the Hall family and Stephanie Bon were (and are) compulsive liars who cannot be relied on to tell the truth.

Stephanie Bon denied ever being Simon Hall’s girlfriend for starters - even though she told the police they were in a relationship at the time of Simon Hall’s murder of Joan Albert (Read more from here http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/12/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9%ef%b8%8f/)

Parky41
 "SK was only alibied by his girlfriend JaJ."
The truth, the fact is, SK was in the company of both his girlfriend and father.

Sandra Lean
Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not?
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg462082.html#msg462082

What was Steven Kelly’s (SK) fathers evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial?

“Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not? ~ Sandra Lean - 5th December 2019”

 

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

The two footprints found in the mud outside the broken kitchen window did not match Simon’s footwear

 

Killer Simon Hall disposed of his footwear the following morning (16th December 2001) and purchased a replacement pair of shoes the same week (Saturday 22nd December 2001)

How did pretend criminologist Sandra Lean think the police could find a ‘match’ if the shoes killer Simon Hall was wearing  had been disposed of just over 24hrs later in Colchester - never to be seen again after possibly ending up in some landfill site

 

Mores to the point what did his then girlfriend Stephanie Bon think about his missing shoes and replacement new pair? And what about killer Simon Hall’s black and red ‘loud’ shirt that went missing? http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/06/quite-a-hall-tale-part-5-%ef%b8%8f/

What about his adoptive mother Lynne Hall? What did Lynne Hall make of the fact her adoptive killer son had purchased a new jacket and pair of shoes days after his murder of Joan Albert?

Just like adoptee Corinne Mitchell - Lynne Hall was prepared to spin a web of deceit in an attempt to cover up for her adoptive sons murder

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

“In spite of police claims that they were trying to eliminate every possible suspect, they never took fingerprints from Simon’s brother Shaun (raising the question, where else might they have had opportunity to take fingerprints, but failed to do so?)

Compulsive liar Shaun Hall was alibied for the weekend. He was miles away with his then girlfriend Leigh and her father (who they lived with in Ipswich)

 

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

The Judge, The Prosecution And Police

”The police had kept quiet about the gastroenterologist report, and had also suppressed statements from neighbours testifying to loud noises heard in the direction of Mrs Albert’s home

 

How did the police keep quiet about the gastroenterologist report exactly?

It was the police who liaised with the gastroenterologist

 

And how exactly could the police suppress statements, given it was the police who took the statements which were then disclosed to the defence team

 

Hoaxer and innocence fraud pusher Sandra Lean failed to mention the names of any of these alleged witnesses who she claimed “to have heard loud “crashing” noises at approximately 2am” nor did Sandra state where in proximity they lived to Joan Albert’s home. And whether or not it was possible they could have heard a window being broken at 6am from where they lived.

Sandra Lean also didn’t consider the fact ‘busy body’ and liar Lynne Hall began to divert attention away from her killer adoptive son (not unlike liar and fraudster Corinne Mitchell) as soon as she heard her ‘friend’ had been murdered - deflecting and attempting to re-write history with anyone who would listen to her. And Lynne Hall spoke to a lot of people/potential witnesses before the police had spoken to them.

Again who exactly ‘testified to loud noises heard in the direction of Mrs Albert’s home’?

Did Sandra Lean rely on compulsive liars the Hall family and Stephanie Bon for content for her chapter 5 of her book No Smoke?

And what impact did liar, fraudster and ‘busy body’ Lynne Hall have on potential witnesses evidence - giving the fact Lynne Hall was speaking to anyone who would listen to her as soon as she heard had ‘friend’ had been brutally murdered by her youngest adoptive son and telling them all kinds of incredulous stories - like she did to the police

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Summary

”As such, there is no evidence presented in court which connects Simon Hall with the murder, the murder scene, or the victim 

 

Sandra Lean did not attend Killer Simon Hall’s murder trial - or killer Luke Mitchell’s - so how could she possibly know exactly what evidence was presented in court?

Pretend criminologist Sandra Lean is not a credible or reliable source when it comes to killer Luke Mitchell’s trial for his murder of [Name removed]

[Nicholas]

“Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not? ~ Sandra Lean - 5th December 2019”

December 2019 !?!

 

[Nicholas]

What was Steven Kelly’s (SK) fathers evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial?

“Until 2014, that claim was not made known to the defence. Why not? ~ Sandra Lean - 5th December 2019”

 

 

https://imgur.com/6e0w9wG

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean did not attend Killer Simon Hall’s murder trial - or killer Luke Mitchell’s - so how could she possibly know exactly what evidence was presented in court?

Pretend criminologist Sandra Lean is not a credible or reliable source when it comes to killer Luke Mitchell’s trial for his murder of [Name removed]

So many things Lean claims keep getting contradicted by people who were actually there at the time...

And none of the people duped by hoaxer & innocence fraud phenomenon (as opposed to the outdated ‘miscarriage of justice’ phenomenon) pusher Sandra Lean know any of the details about sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s bikes

Or what exactly cruel and callous adoptee Corinne Mitchell and brother Shane Mitchell were up to that night and where sadistic killer Luke Mitchell was exactly after he had committed murder

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

The two footprints found in the mud outside the broken kitchen window did not match Simon’s footwear

 

Killer Simon Hall disposed of his footwear the following morning (16th December 2001) and purchased a replacement pair of shoes the same week (Saturday 22nd December 2001)


How did pretend criminologist Sandra Lean think the police could find a ‘match’ if the shoes killer Simon Hall was wearing  had been disposed of just over 24hrs later in Colchester - never to be seen again after possibly ending up in some landfill site

 

Mores to the point what did his then girlfriend Stephanie Bon think about his missing shoes and replacement new pair? And what about killer Simon Hall’s black and red ‘loud’ shirt that went missing?http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/06/quite-a-hall-tale-part-5-%ef%b8%8f/

What about his adoptive mother Lynne Hall? What did Lynne Hall make of the fact her adoptive killer son had purchased a new jacket and pair of shoes days after his murder of Joan Albert?

Just like adoptee Corinne Mitchell - Lynne Hall was prepared to spin a web of deceit in an attempt to cover up for her adoptive sons murder

And killer Simon Hall’s missing leather jacket which another girlfriend called Phoebe was duped into believing wasn’t missing
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/04/29/quite-a-hall-tale-part-2%ef%b8%8f/

How many people have been duped into wrongly believing sadistic killer Luke Mitchell didn’t own a khaki green parka with badges on the sleeve prior to his murder of [Name removed] and the purchase of a replacement parka?

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

The two footprints found in the mud outside the broken kitchen window did not match Simon’s footwear

 

Killer Simon Hall disposed of his footwear the following morning (16th December 2001) and purchased a replacement pair of shoes the same week (Saturday 22nd December 2001)

How did pretend criminologist Sandra Lean think the police could find a ‘match’ if the shoes killer Simon Hall was wearing  had been disposed of just over 24hrs later in Colchester - never to be seen again after possibly ending up in some landfill site

 

Mores to the point what did his then girlfriend Stephanie Bon think about his missing shoes and replacement new pair? And what about killer Simon Hall’s black and red ‘loud’ shirt that went missing? http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/06/quite-a-hall-tale-part-5-%ef%b8%8f/

What about his adoptive mother Lynne Hall? What did Lynne Hall make of the fact her adoptive killer son had purchased a new jacket and pair of shoes days after his murder of Joan Albert?

Just like adoptee Corinne Mitchell - Lynne Hall was prepared to spin a web of deceit in an attempt to cover up for her adoptive sons murder

Why did hoaxer and pretend criminologist Sandra Lean leave all of these factual details out of her first book No Smoke?

All witness statements quoted in the blog series (http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/the-truth-behind-killer-simon-hall-and-his-enablers-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-scam-%ef%b8%8f/) were available to killer Simon Hall prior to his trial in February 2003.

Liar and fraudster Stephanie Bon had access to the case files as did Lynne and Phil Hall (Simon Hall’s adoptive parents)

Stephanie (Hall) did not know Sandra Lean when she wrote and published her book No Smoke

Contact between Stephanie (Hall) and Sandra Lean did not begin until after Sandra Lean had written to killer Simon Hall (2009)

A copy of Sandra Leans letter where she refers to Stephanie (Hall) as ‘Steph’ and writes about her PhD can be read here https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/30/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18d%EF%B8%8F/

[Nicholas]

A copy of Sandra Leans letter where she refers to Stephanie (Hall) as ‘Steph’ and writes about her PhD can be read here https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/30/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18d%EF%B8%8F/

Reuben March 2010
Mr Hall's family was approached about a PHD in 2006, the book came after, 2007 / 08.  I never said they were connected, I said that the PHD was the reason behind the first contact from S.L.

Corinne Mitchell March 2010
I am sorry, but you are actually, factually.....wrong.
The book and the PHD are not connected. Sandra began her PHD a couple of years AFTER book was published. When she was writing the book a PHD hadn't entered her head. I know....because I was there!!!
The book was never a promise of help it was written to make the general public aware of how rotten our justice system is.

Who was lying?

And what do records reveal about when exactly Sandra Lean started her PhD?

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

Forensic And Other Physical Evidence

The two footprints found in the mud outside the broken kitchen window did not match Simon’s footwear

Further excerpt by PhD student Sandra Lean

”These footprints have never been matched to any other person, and it is unclear as to how much effort was made to find the owner of the shoes which created these prints

Again - killer Simon Hall disposed of the shoes he was wearing when he committed his murder on the following morning, when he made the excuse to drive to his workplace in Colchester, Essex to ask for a couple of days off to ‘look after’ his adoptive mother Lynne Hall - after having murdered her ‘friend’

How were the police to find the owner of ‘these prints’ if the shoes which made said prints had been thrown away and killer Simon Hall, and all those people who knew he had owned the shoes (which made ‘these prints’) pretended he didn’t own them?

Further excerpt

“Summary
Two footprints found outside the broken window were proven not to be his”

NO THEY WERE NOT !

[Nicholas]

Further from Sandra Lean

Summary
”Neither Simon nor his car were ever identified by any person as having been at, or near the scene of crime, and there were no report of a “noisy exhaust” in the area in spite of the prosecutions contention that he drove to the area, parked his car in some unspecified place, then climbed over fences and through gardens to Mrs Albert’s house

Again - Lynne Hall saw her adoptive son Simon Hall just minutes after he had committed his murder of Joan Albert.
Lynne Hall also saw his car.
As did his adoptive father Phil Hall when Phil eventually got out of bed, washed and dressed to go outside to set off for the family Christmas meal up in Lincolnshire
Ergo Sandra Leans assertion that “Simon nor his car were ever idenfied by any person as having been at, or near the scene of crime” was (and is) ludicrous

What is not known is if Lynne Hall first saw her killer son park his car, then disappear while he went off to brutally murder her ‘friend’ or if Lynne first saw the car afterwards

What is known is that Lynne Hall was (and is) a compulsive liar

And given the fact Lynne Hall was (and is) a compulsive liar she would hardly admit to having heard the cars “noisy exhaust”

And the car was not parked in an “unspecified place” - killer Simon Hall told the police where he parked his car during his two days of police questioning. It was parked in Snowcroft, where he then set off on foot down the alleyways

Not only did Sandra Lean not attend the two week trial she did not visit Capel St Mary. Killer Simon Hall walked through alley ways before climbing a fence into Joan Albert’s garden

“..in spite of the prosecutions contention that he drove to the area”

 

Why should there have been reports of an alleged ‘noisy exhaust’ at 05:45 - 06:00hrs on a Sunday morning a week before Christmas in Snowcroft?

Was the “noisy exhaust” at intermittent noise at this point?

Did Lynne Hall hear the “noisy exhaust” but pretend she hadn’t heard it?

Who else was up at that time of the morning in Snowcroft?

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from hoaxer, innocence fraud pusher and liar Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

The Judge, Prosecution and Police

”The alleged murder weapon has nothing whatsoever to link it with the crime, or with Simon Hall, in spite of the fact the victim had been stabbed “repeatedly”. 

 

Yes it did

The ‘murder weapon’, which was the knife found on the kitchen floor had body tissue and blood matching Joan Albert on it

 

[Nicholas]

Further excerpt from liar and fraudster Sandra Lean’s book No Smoke (chapter 5)

“The judge, in this case, appears, quite blatantly, to have ignored much of the factual evidence and, as a result, to have misled the jury

That’s one hellava projection - with Sandra Lean misleading her readers