"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

A dynamite piece of testimony wasn’t reported in the media? Behave.

What did the media report on the missing lock knife?

Or was this the missing brown handled Jack Pyke stunting knife?

Robert Gilhooly referred to two knives

“
He was then shown two knives which he recalled having seen in Mitchell's possession.

There’s only one exhibit in the public domain of the missing brown handled knife Jack Pyke knife

What did the other missing knife look like?

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
Paul Cormack "In-credible" - exactly, their entire case lacks credibility. And still, they refuse to answer questions.

 

[faithlilly]

There are numerous examples of ‘dynamite’ pieces of testimony that aren’t reported on in other cases

Not in high profile cases like this.

[faithlilly]

What did the media report on the missing lock knife?

Or was this the missing brown handled Jack Pyke stunting knife?

Robert Gilhooly referred to two knives

There’s only one exhibit in the public domain of the missing brown handled knife Jack Pyke knife

What did the other missing knife look like?

Several witnesses were asked about this important piece of the Crown’s case and that testimony was reported in the media.

[Nicholas]

Not in high profile cases like this.

Show me a photograph of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s other missing knife

Not the missing brown handled Jack Pyke knife - the other one

“MURDER accused Luke Mitchell was two-timing Jodi Jones with a girl who looked 'almost identical' to her, a court was told yesterday.

One of Mitchell's friends had met the other girl. Mitchell spoke very highly of her, it was claimed.

But when the pal, Robert Gilhooly, 17, was later shown a picture of the girl, he thought it was Jodi.

The jury at the High Court in Edinburgh were shown pictures of the two girls.

They also heard that Mitchell, 16, who denies murdering Jodi, was once caught with a knife which, it was claimed, was made for one purpose - killing.

Robert, 17, of Livingston, West Lothian, said Mitchell used to visit his father in the town at weekends and he became friendly with him.

He was then shown two knives which he recalled having seen in Mitchell's possession.

[Nicholas]

Not in high profile cases like this.

I don’t recall seeing a photograph of Kimberly Thomson either

“MURDER accused Luke Mitchell was two-timing Jodi Jones with a girl who looked 'almost identical' to her, a court was told yesterday.

One of Mitchell's friends had met the other girl. Mitchell spoke very highly of her, it was claimed.

But when the pal, Robert Gilhooly, 17, was later shown a picture of the girl, he thought it was Jodi.

The jury at the High Court in Edinburgh were shown pictures of the two girls.

They also heard that Mitchell, 16, who denies murdering Jodi, was once caught with a knife which, it was claimed, was made for one purpose - killing.

Robert, 17, of Livingston, West Lothian, said Mitchell used to visit his father in the town at weekends and he became friendly with him.

He was then shown two knives which he recalled having seen in Mitchell's possession.

[faithlilly]

Show me a photograph of sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s other missing knife

Not the missing brown handled Jack Pyke knife - the other one

Were questions about the knife put to witnesses and were those questions and answers reported in the media?

[faithlilly]

I don’t recall seeing a photograph of Kimberly Thomson either

But you know of Kimberley Thompson because of reports of her testimony in the media.

You really are making my case for me.

[Nicholas]

Were questions about the knife put to witnesses and were those questions and answers reported in the media?

Can you name a single reporter who covered each and every day of the 42 day trial?

And one who didn’t step out for a break or to report on another story while all the other ‘dynamite’ evidence was being heard during the trial?

Other than the kiler, the Judge, the jury and the legal people - who else sat through out each and every 42 days worth of evidence?

[Nicholas]

Were questions about the knife put to witnesses and were those questions and answers reported in the media?

Where can we read media article about Corinne Mitchell being asked about the two knives Robert Gilhooly was asked about?

[Bullseye]

There is a few bits of information going round about photos of Luke in the parka, cctv, Luke’s dad evidence in court etc but I was wondering where this has come from as it’s not something we heard over the years til now. If this is right then would Scott and and Sandra not have copies of this or at least be aware there were photos and if Luke’s dad had given evidence against Luke in the parka? I know they don’t have everything but do they not have everything that was used in the trial that the defence had?
There is lots of stuff not in the public domain I’m sure but I have to agree that if photos of Luke were used that is something the papers would have reported on. I found this from the herald at time of trial. If there were photos, cctv or if pm had confirmed luke had a parka that would have been raised, turnbull didn’t even say family he only mentioned friends.
I can only conclude there was no photo used at trial. If one existed then you can be sure it would have been used and mentioned here by turnbull. I don’t understand why people need to make stuff up and lie if the evidence is meant to be strong enough.

“The jury also heard that Mrs Mitchell bought her son a German Parka jacket from Flip, in Edinburgh, soon after the murder.
Mr Turnbull said a range of witnesses, including friends, acquaintances and a platoon commander from Mr Mitchell's Army cadets remembered the accused wearing a Parka before Jodi's death. Mrs Mitchell said the one she had bought was his first.”

[Nicholas]

But you know of Kimberley Thompson because of reports of her testimony in the media.

You really are making my case for me.

Who reported on the fibre evidence ?

[Nicholas]

I have to agree that if photos of Luke were used that is something the papers would have reported on. I found this from the herald at time of trial.

Donald Findlay made if very difficult for reporters to report

“…. the young age and the late arrest of the accused, the nature of the evidence, the aggressive approach of the defence to coverage and the absence of visual material - made this a uniquely hard case for 21st century court reporting.

[Nicholas]

I can only conclude there was no photo used at trial. If one existed then you can be sure it would have been used and mentioned here by turnbull. I don’t understand why people need to make stuff up and lie if the evidence is meant to be strong enough.

Donald Findlay made if very difficult for reporters to report

“…. the young age and the late arrest of the accused, the nature of the evidence, the aggressive approach of the defence to coverage and the absence of visual material - made this a uniquely hard case for 21st century court reporting.

[Bullseye]

Donald Findlay made if very difficult for reporters to report

“…. the young age and the late arrest of the accused, the nature of the evidence, the aggressive approach of the defence to coverage and the absence of visual material - made this a uniquely hard case for 21st century court reporting.

Maybe but this was what the reported Turnbull said to Luke’s mum during the trial. He would definitely have mentioned any photos, cctv or the fact that one of the witnesses was Luke’s dad as he was trying to prove she was a liar but all he said was friends. I really don’t think any photos of Luke were used, that doesn’t mean to say one doesn’t exist now that’s  been found over the years.