"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Productions of the Mitchell’s landline calls (production #202) and Shane Mitchell’s mobile calls (production #246) were shown to the jury

4:45pm-4:50pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell arrived home
4:53pm Shane Mitchell logged into the Internet
5:16pm: Shane Mitchell logged off of Internet
6:04pm Shane Mitchell made a telephone call to someone using his mobile
6:20pm Shane Mitchell used his mobile phone to call Gary Coyle’s phone number
6:21pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell left home to drive to Gary Coyle’s house

Shane Mitchell appears to have told police he was heading to Mr Beveridge’s at this time (6:04pm), which can’t be correct if he was home between 4:50pm and “just after” 6:20pm

Who was/is “Mr Beveridge” ?

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“The "fact" that Shane said Luke was not at home between 5pm and 5.45pm” http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

Where did Sandra Lean get 5:45pm from?

In reality - Shane Mitchell arrived home at around 4:45pm, after stopping off at a friends house after work, and he didn’t see killer Luke Mitchell when he arrived home.

Nor was killer Luke Mitchell in the house whilst Shane Mitchell used the Internet - which was between 4:53pm and 5:16pm

[Nicholas]

Productions of the Mitchell’s landline calls (production #202) and Shane Mitchell’s mobile calls (production #246) were shown to the jury

4:45pm-4:50pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell arrived home
4:53pm Shane Mitchell logged into the Internet
5:16pm: Shane Mitchell logged off of Internet
6:04pm Shane Mitchell made a telephone call to someone using his mobile
6:20pm Shane Mitchell used his mobile phone to call Gary Coyle’s phone number
6:21pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell left home to drive to Gary Coyle’s house

Shane Mitchell appears to have told police he was heading to Mr Beveridge’s at this time (6:04pm), which can’t be correct if he was home between 4:50pm and “just after” 6:20pm

Who was/is “Mr Beveridge” ?

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“Shane did not claim that Luke "had not been at home between 5pm and 5.45pm." He said that he did not know if Luke had been at home, and that he had thought he (Shane) was alone "in the house," a subtle, but very important difference.

 

Alan Turnbull: Okay. And accordingly, when you went down after terminating the Internet session, did you see him in the kitchen?

Shane Mitchell: I don’t believe so

[Nicholas]

Scammer Sandra Lean from her first discredited book “No Smoke”

“The "fact" that Shane said Luke was not at home between 5pm and 5.45pm” http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

Where did Sandra Lean get 5:45pm from?

In reality - Shane Mitchell arrived home at around 4:45pm, after stopping off at a friends house after work, and he didn’t see killer Luke Mitchell when he arrived home.

Nor was killer Luke Mitchell in the house whilst Shane Mitchell used the Internet - which was between 4:53pm and 5:16pm

Did Shane Mitchell say he saw his killer brother Luke Mitchell at 5:45pm?

[Nicholas]

In that case, would he not have seen his brother waiting at the end of the road as he drove past?

Not at 6:04pm!

Shane Mitchell claimed he didn’t leave his home at Newbattle Abbey crescent until “just after” he had telephoned Gary Coyle - which he did at 6:20pm

4:45pm-4:50pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell arrived home
4:53pm Shane Mitchell logged into the Internet
5:16pm: Shane Mitchell logged off of Internet
6:04pm Shane Mitchell made a telephone call to someone using his mobile
6:20pm Shane Mitchell used his mobile phone to call Gary Coyle’s phone number
6:21pm (Approx) Shane Mitchell left home to drive to Gary Coyle’s house

[Nicholas]

Productions of the Mitchell’s landline calls (production #202) were shown to the jury

There were no calls made from the landline from the Mitchell house between 4:01pm up to 9:57pm

None!

The 9:57pm call from the Mitchell’s landline telephone was to a number in Bathgate

Ruby Guetta, Corinne Mitchell’s adoptive mother;

“But police have never taken a statement from me. I spoke to him at 4.25pm that day. Luke was his normal self when he phoned. He was asking what he should take out of the freezer for dinner”
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Killer%27s+granny+bids+to+sell+his+story+for+pounds+10%2C000%3B+EXCLUSIVE...-a0171737342

Why would the police have needed to take any statement from Ruby Guetta if they knew there wasn’t a 4:25pm telephone call?

[Mr Apples]

Ruby Guetta, Corinne Mitchell’s adoptive mother;

“But police have never taken a statement from me. I spoke to him at 4.25pm that day. Luke was his normal self when he phoned. He was asking what he should take out of the freezer for dinner”
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Killer%27s+granny+bids+to+sell+his+story+for+pounds+10%2C000%3B+EXCLUSIVE...-a0171737342

Why would the police have needed to take any statement from Ruby Guetta if they knew there wasn’t a 4:25pm telephone call?

Was it ascertained that LM never phoned and spoke to his gran Ruby Guetta at Scott's Caravans at 1625 from the Mitchell family landline? Do you have a cite or a link?

[Nicholas]

”Did Shane or Corrine see Luke at tea time?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html

“The crucial significance of court transcripts being publicly available, is confirmation of verbatim trial evidence, as opposed to reliance on published, summary accounts, often from sources which carry an agenda. Especially regarding this trial, accuracy in relation to testimonies is imperative. It is essential to understand the original perspective and context.”

The author of this blog is both manipulative and deceptive

Like scammer Sandra Lean the author has intentionally left out a large volume of Shane Mitchell’s testimony, along with a day or twos worth of Corinne Mitchell’s testimony oe; trial transcripts relating to her 

The author also carries an agenda and their words betray them

[Nicholas]

”Did Shane or Corrine see Luke at tea time?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html

The author states;

“These sections relate to Shane explaining whether he had seen his brother in the house or not, after arriving home at 4.55 pm”

Shane Mitchell had logged on to the Internet by 4:53pm therefore he was home earlier than 4:55pm

 

Might be helpful to look at the trial transcripts of DI William Craven

[Nicholas]

”Did Shane or Corrine see Luke at tea time?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html

“The crucial significance of court transcripts being publicly available, is confirmation of verbatim trial evidence, as opposed to reliance on published, summary accounts, often from sources which carry an agenda. Especially regarding this trial, accuracy in relation to testimonies is imperative. It is essential to understand the original perspective and context.”

The author of this blog is both manipulative and deceptive

Like scammer Sandra Lean the author has intentionally left out a large volume of Shane Mitchell’s testimony, along with a day or twos worth of Corinne Mitchell’s testimony oe; trial transcripts relating to her 

The author also carries an agenda and their words betray them

Good to see however the author has edited the footer of each of their blogs

“Court transcripts are considered public information under Section 94(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) act 1995

[Nicholas]

Why, in June 2023, did scammer Sandra Lean choose to help enable sadistic killer Luke Mitchell sabotage his move back to closed prison conditions?

What did Corinne Mitchell say about this?

[Nicholas]

”Did Shane or Corrine see Luke at tea time?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html

“The crucial significance of court transcripts being publicly available, is confirmation of verbatim trial evidence, as opposed to reliance on published, summary accounts, often from sources which carry an agenda. Especially regarding this trial, accuracy in relation to testimonies is imperative. It is essential to understand the original perspective and context.”

Excerpts from Corinne Mitchell’s police witness statement dated 6th July 2003;

“When I got in, Luke was in the kitchen”

[Nicholas]

Why, in June 2023, did scammer Sandra Lean choose to help enable sadistic killer Luke Mitchell sabotage his move back to closed prison conditions?

Did the prison service and MAPPA send sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell back to closed prison conditions because they recognised he was manipulating women like Gemma Chapman and Sharon Indy Sunshine?

Were these the risk factors that escalated?

[Nicholas]

Was it ascertained that LM never phoned and spoke to his gran Ruby Guetta at Scott's Caravans at 1625 from the Mitchell family landline? Do you have a cite or a link?

Production no.202 - which was of the Mitchell family landline telephone call log evidenced that no calls were made from the landline between 4:01pm to 9:57pm

Productions of the Mitchell’s landline calls (production #202) were shown to the jury

This (production no.202) was evidence the jury were shown on a screen - on more than one occasion

[Kenmair]

Why, in June 2023, did scammer Sandra Lean choose to help enable sadistic killer Luke Mitchell sabotage his move back to closed prison conditions?

What did Corinne Mitchell say about this?

SL probably encouraged him for her own publicity. Her house of cards is slowly falling with the transcript lies and her 60th party/murderer fundraiser in Dalkeith idea. Her eye rolling and arm waving have become even more erratic as she realises the tide isn't turning and she's been hoisted by her own petard. Ooof.

Slowly the slightly more curious among the pro-LM campaign will realise they've been lied to for Lean's benefit only.

[Nicholas]

SL probably encouraged him for her own publicity.

These two narcissists (Sandra Lean and killer Luke Mitchell) have a twisted symbiotic relationship, which Corinne Mitchell will be well aware of