Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 765820 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4515 on: November 10, 2023, 10:39:20 PM »
Sandra Lean

Why have you been telling people because you are in Scotland you can’t sue people in England?

 @)(++(*
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4516 on: November 10, 2023, 10:44:33 PM »
Is this Stuart Henderson ?

We Stand Together For Luke Mitchell
@W_S_T_F_L_M
Alan Turnbull addressed the Judge but while the Jury was out the room
@Justic4LM
@stuzi_pants
@Stephenheid
@SandraLean5
@GoogleExpertUK
@Tucker5law
 @WeKnowTheyKnow1
@Raicheruu
@Truth4Luke
 @michael73798531
@DaleVince 
@fundingscotland
@theedgefund
Image
6:15 PM · Nov 10, 2023

Today - the above account tweeted that the jury were not informed that the charges for attempting to pervert the course of justice against Shane Mitchell and Corinne Mitchell

 *&^^&

The @WeKnowTheyKnow1 and @JusticeforLM twitter accounts no longer exist

Heather Brunt is too busy harassing and abusing people to notice this apparently

Heather
@Truth4Luke
....and BOTH Passed their lie detector tests
6:31 PM · Nov 10, 2023
« Last Edit: November 10, 2023, 10:49:58 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4517 on: November 10, 2023, 11:22:35 PM »
It was blatantly obvious charlatan Sandra Lean had targeted Sharon before the James English nonsense in 2019

Sandra Lean even appeared to pretend like she was nervous

What happened prior to Lean’s October 2022 “update” and why did she choose to use a clip which included Sharon’s first video with her?

Sandra Lean intentionally used that clip of her and Sharon in her Oct 2022 “update”
« Last Edit: November 10, 2023, 11:43:15 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4518 on: November 10, 2023, 11:47:51 PM »
Sandra Lean states here: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg452488.html#msg452488
I'm sorry, I seem to have caused a bit of a misunderstanding. Of the incoming voicemail call on Luke's phone that night, I saidI didn't mean the actual call was still on Luke's phone - I should have made that clearer. The record of the call going to voicemail is in the phone logs, Corinne said in her statement that she was trying to call Luke to find out what was going on, but got his voicemail - the timings given in her statement and both her and Luke's phone records all matched up. My point was that the police deliberately lied about Luke "checking his voicemail" when the log is clearly labelled "incoming."

All of the police assertions regarding the phone calls, texts, etc, were put to Luke in the Section 14 interrogation 6 weeks after the murder. By then, the police had the phone logs - they also recovered a text from Corinne to Luke saying, "Right, you tell me right now what's going on - I'm coming up to get you" (not recovered from Luke's phone)
.


Corrine Mitchell
“You will tell me right now what is wrong. I'm on my way up to find you”


Sandra Lean
“Right, you tell me right now what's going on - I'm coming up to get you”


Alan Turnbull went through all the call logs for the jury during the trial

Derek Morris was one of the witnesses who also helped the jury understand the phone data

’She said her son returned home quite early that night, at around 9pm, and told her that Jodi had not turned up.

“Did that surprise you?” Mr Turnbull asked.

“Yes, it did,” she replied.

She said they thought perhaps Jodi had gone to a friend’s house or had been grounded.

“How would you describe the way he was reacting to the fact she hadn’t turned up?” Mr Turnbull asked.

Mrs Mitchell replied: “I think more miffed that she hadn’t turned up.”

Asked whether he had seemed anxious, she said: “Not at that point, no.” She said he then went up to his bedroom before taking the dog for a walk.

Later that evening the police told her that Jodi Jones was dead. She denied she then said to police: “Is Luke a suspect?”

Mrs Mitchell explained she would not have said that, because she thought at that stage Jodi had died an accidental death. “I worried that she might have left her inhaler and suffered a breathing attack.”



https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg386928.html#msg386928
Sandra Lean
Here are the known facts -
Luke returned home at 9.30pm (based on testimony from the other boys he was hanging around with that night.)
He took Mia out for her last walk at around 10.20 - 10.30 -
it was during this walk that he received JuJ's text intended for Jodi.
« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 12:19:34 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4519 on: November 11, 2023, 02:34:10 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

The way Sandra said “hope you’re well” sounded fake, put on, another of her ruses

Why didn’t Sandra ask anyone else if they were “well”?

Why just Sharon?

In reality - Sharon was Sandra Lean’s special one, the chosen one, one of her main targeted marks

And Sandra’s replica wall nonsense was nonsense also

The replica wall was built so that the witnesses could demonstrate to the jury exactly where they were

It wasn’t “pure theatre” as scammer Sandra Lean claimed

None of these witnesses were actors or actresses or familiar with being stood in front of a court room full of people (it was a packed courtroom, the public queued to get in)

The replica wall was important for both the defence and the prosecution

This was the trial of a teenager, who if found guilty (like he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison

Sandra Lean claimed the replica wall was “rubbish” and complained about the “money” spent on building it

The replica wall was an important part of the trial and of killer Luke Mitchell’s defence

It was built for fairness

It was built to ensure a teenager was not “wrongly convicted”

Scammer Sandra Lean also stated;

“We paid for that” “we paid for the entire trial as well and all the police officers who were involved in the investigation that we now know, that we now know was disastrous” 🙄

Sandra Lean intentionally said “that we now know” twice 🙄

But Sandra Lean - to this day - has no clue about the police investigation

She had no clue about who the police investigated and/or spoke to as part of their investigation

She has been blagging for all these years - pretending she understands police investigations

Again - this was a teenager who, if found guilty (as he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison - possibly the rest of his life

This trial needed to get it right first time around - which it did!

As the 4 appeals since have also demonstrated!



« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 03:04:23 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4520 on: November 11, 2023, 03:07:01 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

The way Sandra said “hope you’re well” sounded fake, put on, another of her ruses

Why didn’t Sandra ask anyone else if they were “well”?

Why just Sharon?

In reality - Sharon was Sandra Lean’s special one, the chosen one, one of her main targeted marks

And Sandra’s replica wall nonsense was nonsense also

The replica wall was built so that the witnesses could demonstrate to the jury exactly where they were

It wasn’t “pure theatre” as scammer Sandra Lean claimed

None of these witnesses were actors or actresses or familiar with being stood in front of a court room full of people (it was a packed courtroom, the public queued to get in)

The replica wall was important for both the defence and the prosecution

This was the trial of a teenager, who if found guilty (like he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison

Sandra Lean claimed the replica wall was “rubbish” and complained about the “money” spent on building it

The replica wall was an important part of the trial and of killer Luke Mitchell’s defence

It was built for fairness

It was built to ensure a teenager was not “wrongly convicted”

Scammer Sandra Lean also stated;

“We paid for that” “we paid for the entire trial as well and all the police officers who were involved in the investigation that we now know, that we now know was disastrous” 🙄

Sandra Lean intentionally said “that we now know” twice 🙄

But Sandra Lean - to this day - has no clue about the police investigation

Again - this was a teenager who, if found guilty (as he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison - possibly the rest of his life

This trial needed to get it right first time around - which it did as the 4 appeals since have also demonstrated

Quote
Jen Gale
@genthewren
·
Nov 9
I daresay one of the officers on the case had a partner who's replica scale wall business was about to fold.

Got to love a little bit of Jen!

Or on Mr Mathews around the Sky interview!

Quote
Jen Gale
@genthewren
·
Nov 10
One officer had a brother who couldn't find work on account of looking and sounding like an evil gnome. So he held him down and shaved his long black beard, burned his pointed hat and packed him off Sky News with a large brown envelope. No one knows what became of him.

 (&^&

Offline Parky41

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4521 on: November 11, 2023, 03:11:17 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

The way Sandra said “hope you’re well” sounded fake, put on, another of her ruses

Why didn’t Sandra ask anyone else if they were “well”?

Why just Sharon?

In reality - Sharon was Sandra Lean’s special one, the chosen one, one of her main targeted marks

And Sandra’s replica wall nonsense was nonsense also

The replica wall was built so that the witnesses could demonstrate to the jury exactly where they were

It wasn’t “pure theatre” as scammer Sandra Lean claimed

None of these witnesses were actors or actresses or familiar with being stood in front of a court room full of people (it was a packed courtroom, the public queued to get in)

The replica wall was important for both the defence and the prosecution

This was the trial of a teenager, who if found guilty (like he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison

Sandra Lean claimed the replica wall was “rubbish” and complained about the “money” spent on building it

The replica wall was an important part of the trial and of killer Luke Mitchell’s defence

It was built for fairness

It was built to ensure a teenager was not “wrongly convicted”

Scammer Sandra Lean also stated;

“We paid for that” “we paid for the entire trial as well and all the police officers who were involved in the investigation that we now know, that we now know was disastrous” 🙄

Sandra Lean intentionally said “that we now know” twice 🙄

But Sandra Lean - to this day - has no clue about the police investigation

She had no clue about who the police investigated and/or spoke to as part of their investigation

She has been blagging for all these years - pretending she understands police investigations

Again - this was a teenager who, if found guilty (as he was done) would be spending a very, very long time in prison - possibly the rest of his life

This trial needed to get it right first time around - which it did!

As the 4 appeals since have also demonstrated!

The wall as you highlight, put together to show clearly the sequence of events that had taken place on the path side.

I did note on her latest live that responses in the comments were primarily around those mentioning £'s?


Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4522 on: November 11, 2023, 03:32:02 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean also stated (referring to the murderers trial);

“That was manipulated into existence”

Not unlike the fraudulent campaign for sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell she has orchestrated
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4523 on: November 11, 2023, 03:39:33 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean also stated during her above nonsense of a video

“I might put in a freedom of information request (FOIR) actually just to see if we can get that information”

She was attempting to plant a seed into her “marks’” minds to have them do this

Sandra Lean will have made ZERO FOIR since she stated this 
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4524 on: November 11, 2023, 03:58:15 PM »
”Shane discusses the websites accessed - directly from the transcripts”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/websites-and-porn.html?m=1

June 26th, 2019 - Jeremy Bamber Forum
Sandra Lean
And, before the inevitable comments about him "admitting" that he was masturbating, he didn't. I have the court transcripts - it was put to him that he might have been "doing something else" whilst looking at the images ... Shane agreed that he "may have been" - that's it. We now, know, of course, that the "pornographic images" were almost certainly pop-ups, on screen for a few seconds, so he wasn't "watching porn" as has been claimed for all these years".


 *&^^&
« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 04:03:00 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4525 on: November 11, 2023, 04:55:42 PM »
”Shane discusses the websites accessed - directly from the transcripts”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/websites-and-porn.html?m=1

June 26th, 2019 - Jeremy Bamber Forum
Sandra Lean
And, before the inevitable comments about him "admitting" that he was masturbating, he didn't. I have the court transcripts - it was put to him that he might have been "doing something else" whilst looking at the images ... Shane agreed that he "may have been" - that's it. We now, know, of course, that the "pornographic images" were almost certainly pop-ups, on screen for a few seconds, so he wasn't "watching porn" as has been claimed for all these years".


 *&^^&
Scammer Sandra Lean from her page 269 of her betraying the innocence nonsense of a book

DC1: What about the use of pornographic books... did Jodi see those books... you didn’t look at them together or anything?
Again, Luke answered, “No.”


What was the then 14 year old killer Luke Mitchell doing with pornsgrwphic book and who bought them for him?

Were the pornagrapgic books another Christmas present from Corinne Mitchell?

Did Shane Mitchell give his then 14 year old brother pornagraphic books?

Who was the supplier of these pornagraphic books and where did they come from?
« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 05:15:52 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4526 on: November 11, 2023, 05:17:58 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean from the above video

“I used to renovate properties”?

When and where and how many properties did you renovate Sandra Lean?

And why if you used to “renovate properties” as you alleged did you lose your home and business?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4527 on: November 11, 2023, 05:22:25 PM »
Scammer Sandra Lean from her page 269 of her betraying the innocence nonsense of a book

DC1: What about the use of pornographic books... did Jodi see those books... you didn’t look at them together or anything?
Again, Luke answered, “No.”


What was the then 14 year old killer Luke Mitchell doing with pornsgrwphic book and who bought them for him?

Were the pornagrapgic books another Christmas present from Corinne Mitchell?

Did Shane Mitchell give his then 14 year old brother pornagraphic books?

Who was the supplier of these pornagraphic books and where did they come from?

Scammer Sandra Lean from page 269 (IB)

Luke had already answered, in detail, questions about protection – this further question appeared to have no justification, other than keeping an intense and uncomfortable focus on sex. 🙄

Was sadistic murderer and sexual deviant Luke Mitchell “uncomfortable” when he received these pornagraphic books Sandra Lean?

Was sadist Luke Mitchell  “uncomfortable” about his mother Corinne Mitchell finding these pornographic books ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4528 on: November 11, 2023, 05:46:50 PM »
During scammer Sandra Lean’s replica of the wall nonsense of a video she stated;

Hi Sharon - hope you’re well

The video is called “learn how your justice system works” 🙄

Scammer Sandra Lean from the above video again (in response to Derek)🙄

I think it’s clear, I think it’s clear, that, that, the, the er independent review is essentially saying - they stitch it up amongst themselves

“They have, they have stitched it up among themselves to create the cases they want to create   


 *&^^&

All these “independent” people who did not attend killer Luke Mitchell’s trial and have never read each and everyone of the trial transcripts
« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 05:57:27 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4529 on: November 11, 2023, 06:34:44 PM »
TJ C
@TJC1419439
Straight from the transcripts - Luke's brother and the computer
…https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/websites-and-porn.html…
11:33 PM · Nov 10, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1723121826262360136

TJ C
@TJC1419439
@WeKnowTheyKnow1
@TweetStreetocc1
@hawaii_fivo
@Naomi_TV
11:37 PM · Nov 10, 2023


Why did the author of @TJC1419439 tag in @WeKnowTheyKnow1  when the account no longer exists?

Oh it’s still there retweeting Heather Brunt 🙄

We Stand Together For Luke Mitchell
@W_S_T_F_L_M
#LukeMitchell is a very intelligent Man. Enough not to admit to something he has ‘t done. He would rather spend the rest of his life in Jail.
Listn to Luke’s treatment from authorities, in his own words.
@stuzi_pants
@Stephenheid
@Tucker5law
@DaleVince
youtube.com
Luke Mitchell - Sound of Silence Part 1
In this first of a series 4 interviews, Luke tells what his life is like right now and the beginning, almost 2 years ago, of a new and even more insidious fo...
8:43 PM · Nov 9, 2023


 *&^^&

Heather Brunt projecting

Heather
@Truth4Luke
Listened to Rachel's Live Feed Earlier, Dr Lean Was Saying The Untested Samples Were Labeled
"Not For Trial"
@PoliceScotland Are Making An Absolute Fool Of The Public and #LukeMitchell and the disrespect they STILL Show a 14year murdered child. Sickening
4:02 PM · Nov 4, 2023

https://twitter.com/Truth4Luke/status/1720834015802908759

 *&^^&
« Last Edit: November 11, 2023, 06:51:11 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation