Excerpt from innocence fraudster Nick Wallis’s book on thief, embezzler & fraudster Seema Misra
“Seema is fuzzy on exactly when she started agreeing monthly Horizon balances which bore no relation to the amount of cash she had behind the counter. She remembers the big jump in discrepancies which came about after introducing individual stock units made it impossible to keep making good with the Misras’ own cash.
By February 2006 Seema had no staff left! Shakia, Javed & Nadia had left!
Therefore there was no need for “individual stock units” after this time!
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2024/01/25/crime-pays-the-true-story-of-seema-davinder-misra-their-west-byfleet-shop-post-office-with-the-horizon-it-computer-system-part-23/
Innocence fraudster Nick Wallis also stated in his book (as a footnote);
“
In Seema’s case, the independent investigators tasked with looking at what happened concluded the losses were probably down to a combination of systemic problems, mistakes being made by the Misras and employee theft of activated scratchcards.The “
independent investigators” call themselves Second Sight
Innocence fraudsters Ian Henderson and Ron Warmington make up Second Sight
Thief, embezzler and fraudster Seema Misra falsely accused Shakia Suksener, Nadia Badiwalia and his sister-in-law Nadia Badiwalia of stealing £89-90k from the post office!?
She told the jury she caught the pretend thieves “
red handed”During Seema’s Misra’s taped interview, whilst under caution, she stated;
“Lottery money was being taken from shop but never entered on horizon. Even on the shop side was low as well, so we got rid of them”
Before her trial began in October 2010, Seema Misra dropped her false allegations of theft against Shakia Suksener
Warwick Tatford addressed this in the absence of the jury stating “..
detailed defence statement that was served “on the 21st January 2010 “..there are references to the thieves that Mrs Misra thought she had found. Paragraph (c) says in fact that she was satisfied that Shakia Suksener was not accountable, not a theft, which does not tie in with the earlier letter where her identity is set out as a thief..”The three court of appeal judges quoted innocence fraudsters Second Sight in their April 2021 judgement, stating at para 92 (
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Hamilton-Others-v-Post-Office-judgment-230421.pdf);“
Seema Misra had been appointed an SPM in 2005. We note that in a report prepared by Second Sight in April 2015 (in connection with the possibility of mediation), the appellant is recorded as saying:
she was surprised to find that discrepancies occurred on each day of her onsite training, particularly as the trainer had watched every transaction she carried out that week. She adds that in the second week, an unexplained shortfall of approximately £200 occurred whilst balancing, and that the trainer rang the Helpline for assistance.The above was concocted!
Seema Misra’s evidence at trial was of a “£
150” figure and an alleged “£
400 shortfall” figure, she said nothing about Second Sights’ “
£200” figure! This was and is a fabrication
The only time Seema used the words “
200” during her trial, was in relation to reminding the jury how much she had paid for the West Byfleet costcutters shop and post office
More importantly, Seema Misra also stated during her trial re: trainer Michael “
Then I remember him staying behind and he made a phone call from office, I don’t know where” he had phoned in the “
office”
There was zero evidence of any call having been made to the helpline during the early part of July 2005 by trainer Michael or anyone else
By February 2022, during the post office IT inquiry, Seema Misra’s “
£150” figure given by her during her trial, had dropped to “
around 80 something, under 100 short” http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2024/01/25/crime-pays-the-true-story-of-seema-davinder-misra-their-west-byfleet-shop-post-office-with-the-horizon-it-computer-system-part-23/
