Why doesn't Shane Mitchell speak out if his brother is innocent?

[Nicholas]

It seems he said it was true.

I agree

Isn’t it interesting though how the other pathologist didn’t appear on the frontline Scotland BBC doc and only Prof Busuttil did

It was Prof Busuttil who suggested during Mitchell murder trial - when asked by Donald Findlay whether or not there were any suggestion of replicating the injuries of Elizebeth Short - ‘some similarities perhaps superficial similarities’ yet the other pathologist concluded there were no forensically significant similarities

[faithlilly]

It seems he said it was true.

Said what was true?

[faithlilly]

I agree

Isn’t it interesting though how the other pathologist didn’t appear on the frontline Scotland BBC doc

Are you saying that the Crown’s pathologist who did appear was being dishonest?

[Nicholas]

Are you saying that the Crown’s pathologist who did appear was being dishonest?

What does Prof Busuttil say about his evidence given during Mitchell’s murder trial?

Does he say he was dishonest ?

[faithlilly]

What does Prof Busuttil say about his evidence given during Mitchell’s murder trial?

Does he say he was dishonest ?

It’s you who appears to need corroboration for Prof Busuttil’s piece in the Frontine Scotland documentary.

What did he say in court about the similarities of the injuries to the Black Dahlia case?

[Paranoid Android]

Said what was true?

Post mortem mutilation.

[Nicholas]

What did he say in court about the similarities of the injuries to the Black Dahlia case?

⬇️

when asked by Donald Findlay whether or not there were any suggestion of replicating the injuries of Elizebeth Short - ‘some similarities perhaps superficial similarities’ yet the other pathologist concluded there were no forensically significant similarities

[Nicholas]

It’s you who appears to need corroboration for Prof Busuttil’s piece in the Frontine Scotland documentary.

If Prof Busuttil was dishonest when he gave his evidence during Mitchell’s murder trial then that’s on him

The jury however heard evidence from another pathologist who didn’t agree there were forensically significant similarities

[Nicholas]

If Prof Busuttil was dishonest when he gave his evidence during Mitchell’s murder trial then that’s on him

Also known as perjury btw

[Mrs S]

In fact we know he didn’t, at least with, possibly, a sizeable number of the jury.

It is fact that AD proved Luke’s guilt that's why he got a guilty verdict!  You say possibly a sizeable number of jury weren't convinced of his guilt. It equally could have been 1 juror who didn't think he was guilty .How many thought he was innocent isn't really relevant as enough to convict thought he was

[faithlilly]

Post mortem mutilation.

Thank you.

[faithlilly]

If Prof Busuttil was dishonest when he gave his evidence during Mitchell’s murder trial then that’s on him

The jury however heard evidence from another pathologist who didn’t agree there were forensically significant similarities

So two pathologists agreed that there were no significant similarities between Jodi’s injuries and that of the Black Dhalia.

Glad we got there in the end.

[faithlilly]

It is fact that AD proved Luke’s guilt that's why he got a guilty verdict!  You say possibly a sizeable number of jury weren't convinced of his guilt. It equally could have been 1 juror who didn't think he was guilty .How many thought he was innocent isn't really relevant as enough to convict thought he was

It could have been one, it could have been seven. The point being that at least to a percentage of the jury the case was not proven beyond reasonable doubt....and this after Luke was subjected to virtually wall to wall negative publicity.

I suppose the unfairness of the majority verdict is why English courts insist on a unanimous one.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It could have been one, it could have been seven. The point being that at least to a percentage of the jury the case was not proven beyond reasonable doubt....and this after Luke was subjected to virtually wall to wall negative publicity.

I suppose the unfairness of the majority verdict is why English courts insist on a unanimous one.

they don’t.

[Nicholas]

So two pathologists agreed that there were no significant similarities between Jodi’s injuries and that of the Black Dhalia.

Glad we got there in the end.

No

The crowns pathologist said under oath there were ‘some similarities perhaps superficial similarities’

Then seemingly changed his mind by the time of the BBC frontline doc