Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Mr Gray]

I see the Mail and the Sun are now reporting it.

Copy and pasting would be more accurate. i wonder how much the Scottish Sun....The Sun and the Mail paid for this story. As long as theres some gullible enough to take it at face value its worth it

[G-Unit]

No one would want Madeleine to have been abducted and killed by a vicious Paedophile.  Wolter'

s however seems to think she has been.  Are we supposed to ignore what he says and the evidence he presents? 

You are the odd one if you think anyone would want Madeleine to have suffered at the hands of a Paedophile.

You seem to have overlooked the fact that Wolters said a lot, but produced very little evidence to support his words imo.

[barrier]

Copy and pasting would be more accurate. i wonder how much the Scottish Sun....The Sun and the Mail paid for this story. As long as theres some gullible enough to take it at face value its worth it

Looking around they're all going with it, including the independent, still a caveat needs to added it is the brit press, but a senior mod puts so much stall in them with their constant pasting of press articles maybe we ought take a leaf out of their book and accept its has fact.

[jassi]

You seem to have overlooked the fact that Wolters said a lot, but produced very little evidence to support his words imo.

That's because Wolters doesn't want Brueckner to know what evidence he has.

With that sort of stance, how can matters progress ?

[Mr Gray]

You seem to have overlooked the fact that Wolters said a lot, but produced very little evidence to support his words imo.

And he's explained why.. No ones overlooked anything.  Seems like you can't post without sniping

[Mr Gray]

That's because Wolters doesn't want Brueckner to now what evidence he has.

With that sort of stance, how can matters progress ?

It's quite clear.. Wolters has explained...

[Mr Gray]

Looking around they're all going with it, including the independent, still a caveat needs to added it is the brit press, but a senior mod puts so much stall in them with their constant pasting of press articles maybe we ought take a leaf out of their book and accept its has fact.

However anyone takes it is of no importance

[barrier]

However anyone takes it is of no importance

Even if it brings misinformation to the forum ?

[Mr Gray]

Even if it brings misinformation to the forum ?

thers lots here already...and always will be

[G-Unit]

And he's explained why.. No ones overlooked anything.  Seems like you can't post without sniping

I don't care what he's explained. Until he offers evidence his words are just talk. Pots and kettles oh sniper extraordinaire (imo).

[Mr Gray]

I don't care what he's explained. Until he offers evidence his words are just talk. Pots and kettles oh sniper extraordinaire (imo).

With words..It depends who is saying them...how consistent...how much sense they make...quite  afew things. i think we can give Wolters statements in person more credibility tahn  asecond hand account in teh Scottish Sun.

Do you think that just because you believe I snipe thats givs you the right to make sniping posts to every other posters . Im quite happy for you to highlight every sniping post I make. I think you will have little to do

[Vertigo Swirl]

A piece like that could be written about any channel. I watch BBC2 a lot, and they're obsessed with gardens. I prefer that to the countless Covid updates and pointless interviews with politicians on BBC1. For inanity we have ITV and CH4. The discerning viewer can always find something somewhere to suit them. I don't think many stay on one channel all the time.

The value of the programme lies in it's content, not which channel it's on.

I enjoyed an excellent documentary about Andy Warhol last night.  It was a BBC 2 programme.  I can't imagine Channel 5 ever showing anything remotely as well made, informative and in-depth, but each to their own I guess.  I think the last time I watched Channel 5 it was that incredibly one-sided piece of propaganda on Luke Mitchell.  It seems to get on this channel the programme maker decides on an angle and then sets about trying to prove their point rather than actually doing proper in-depth unbiased research.  Having watched other MWT documentaries too I think this one is likely to follow a similar pattern but we shall see...

[Mr Gray]

I don't care what he's explained. Until he offers evidence his words are just talk. Pots and kettles oh sniper extraordinaire (imo).

Wolters has espalined exactly why he hasnt questioned CB and his explanations make perfect sense. to suggest that this expalnation is of no importance is rather daft imo.

if Wolters had made no expalnation and simply not charged CB that would raise far more questions

[Vertigo Swirl]

Before any sceptic gets carried away by today's MWT revelations they may like to remember what he said back in June 2020 wrt to this case.

‘My analysis back in 2009 in relation to this being a stranger abduction by a predatory paedophile is now being proved in relation to the authorities. I think the evidence supports that.’

[Vertigo Swirl]

You would think that they’d be cockahoop that Madeleine may still be alive and hasn’t been abducted and killed by a vicious paedophile….but no it would appear not.

Odd people.

If MWT concludes in his programme that Madeleine wasn't abducted and killed by a vicious paedophile and is still alive and presents compelling evidence to that effect then I will certainly be cockahoop but I really don't think he's likely to come to that conclusion, do you?