Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Mr Gray]

Of course he didn’t, he’s too smart to give her that satisfaction, but if you think Faithlilly’s comments were designed as anything other than an insult you really should reconsider your role as a moderator imo.

I must say you always speak the truth... Whilst some other posters are just big fat liars

[G-Unit]

Of course he didn’t, he’s too smart to give her that satisfaction, but if you think Faithlilly’s comments were designed as anything other than an insult you really should reconsider your role as a moderator imo.

Well when you're a moderator you can saction people for what you SUSPECT they mean. In my opinion the role of a moderator is to notice and deal with actual factual insults and abuse.

[G-Unit]

Please can we return to the thread topic. Thank you.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I would suggest that until we have all viewed the programme there is very little to add to what has already been said (all or most of it speculation anyway).

[G-Unit]

I would suggest that until we have all viewed the programme there is very little to add to what has already been said (all or most of it speculation anyway).

I agree. What interests me is that it will be an investigation which is unlikely to contain confirmation bias.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I agree. What interests me is that it will be an investigation which is unlikely to contain confirmation bias.

Why have you come to that conclusion?

[G-Unit]

Why have you come to that conclusion?

I don't think MWT will be looking to confirm CB's guilt. I have got the impression that a lot of the media coverage has been leaning rowards that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't think MWT will be looking to confirm CB's guilt. I have got the impression that a lot of the media coverage has been leaning rowards that.

Is it not possible that he made a programme determined to prove he isn't involved (just to be different) and therefore is still exhibiting confirmation bias, just in a different direction?

[G-Unit]

Is it not possible that he made a programme determined to prove he isn't involved (just to be different) and therefore is still exhibiting confirmation bias, just in a different direction?

That is possible, but at least it will offer a different view to compare with what we've already been told.

[jassi]

No other mcCann documentary has stuck to portraying only the truth.
I don't suppose this one will be any different.


IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

No other mcCann documentary has stuck to portraying only the truth.
I don't suppose this one will be any different.


IMO

Which ones have portrayed proven lies then?

[G-Unit]

Which ones have portrayed proven lies then?

I would say it's more a case of ignoring anything which doesn't support the abduction theory.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I would say it's more a case of ignoring anything which doesn't support the abduction theory.

such as?

[Vertigo Swirl]

https://youtu.be/ePUP1m2KsQY
In this Bild interview the interviewee posits exactly what I was saying which is that the “alibi” angle is likely simply a device for selling the documentary and is actually nothing of the sort. 

[G-Unit]

https://youtu.be/ePUP1m2KsQY
In this Bild interview the interviewee posits exactly what I was saying which is that the “alibi” angle is likely simply a device for selling the documentary and is actually nothing of the sort.

Are you fluent in German then?