Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, some sceptics seem to think it's reasonable to posit the scenario that the McCanns called up CB to dispose of their inconvenient package for them, which is of course higlhly plausible and logical - not.  Then some posit that CB innocently opened a bin and discovered a dead Madeleine and decided it would make a great photo.  These people who believe this nonsense really aren't the full shilling IMO. 

[G-Unit]

The one thing that can be said for McCann Supporters is that they are logical.

There wasn't the time, the space or the motive for doing what they have been accused of.

Supporters are, however, quite happy to accept the possibility that there was the time, the space and the motive for a stranger abduction. The PJ weren't convinced;

(if) said checking was as tight as the witnesses and the arguidos describe it, it would be, to say the least, very difficult that the conditions were reunited for the introduction of an abductor
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/P_J_FINAL_REPORT.htm

[Eleanor]

The statements alone lack any rigor, never mind logic. And supporters simply swallowing that guff additionally defies all known logic.

While you appear to know nothing about anything.

[The General]

While you appear to know nothing about anything.

Your wind up game needs some work.

[Mr Gray]

The statements alone lack any rigor, never mind logic. And supporters simply swallowing that guff additionally defies all known logic.

it defies logic because it isnt true
you will find its you and other sceptics who have swallowed all the guff

[Vertigo Swirl]

Supporters are, however, quite happy to accept the possibility that there was the time, the space and the motive for a stranger abduction. The PJ weren't convinced;

(if) said checking was as tight as the witnesses and the arguidos describe it, it would be, to say the least, very difficult that the conditions were reunited for the introduction of an abductor
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/P_J_FINAL_REPORT.htm

The Met disagrees with the PJ's opinion, are you suggesting that they are as illogical as us stupid supporters? 

[barrier]

The Met disagrees with the PJ's opinion, are you suggesting that they are as illogical as us stupid supporters?

The MET disagrees with the BKA also, comments ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The MET disagrees with the BKA also, comments ?

They both agree that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger so....that's two police forces against one (and the latter seems, grudgingly, to have come round to that opinion too, despite what was written in the archiving report back in 2008).

[barrier]

They both agree that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger so....that's two police forces against one (and the latter seems, grudgingly, to have come round to that opinion too, despite what was written in the archiving report back in 2008).

One thinks she dead, no sorry confident she's dead, the other sits on a fence .

[The General]

it defise logic because it isnt true
you will find its you and other sceptics who have swallowed all the guff

I beg to differ.

[Vertigo Swirl]

One thinks she dead, no sorry confident she's dead, the other sits on a fence .

Which bit of "they both believe she was abducted by a stranger" are you struggling to understand?

[Mr Gray]

I beg to differ.

You can differ as much as you like.......Wolters has proof the parents were not involved...that the dogs were wrong...that they have enough evidence to charge....you can deny all that but I look forward to your explanation when you are proved wrong

[The General]

Which bit of "they both believe she was abducted by a stranger" are you struggling to understand?

2 out of 3 ain't bad.

[The General]

You can differ as much as you like.......Wolters has proof the parents were not involved...that the dogs were wrong...that they have enough evidence to charge....you can deny all that but I look forward to your explanation when you are proved wrong

And I yours.
Good day sir.

[G-Unit]

The Met disagrees with the PJ's opinion, are you suggesting that they are as illogical as us stupid supporters?

I have access to the evidence upon which the PJ's opinion was based. Imo they were referring to the time around Jane Tanner's sighting. Afaik, the only additional evidence uncovered by The Met was that which resulted in the abandonment of Jane Tanner's belief that she saw this abductor. That allowed the Met to find a new possible time for an abduction to take place. According to the group timeline, there was a 15 minute gap between 9.45 and 10pm.

Individual recollections weren't quite so specific, especially about the 10pm check by Kate McCann;

'Erm, I was aware she'd gone, erm, at what exact point, again, it's got to be between quarter to ten and ten o'clock, somewhere in that time period'.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FIONA-PAYNE-ROGATORY.htm

The question asked, he relates that she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm