Mark Williams-Thomas making new three part crime series for Ch5.

[Wonderfulspam]

Maybe this girl was only giving a partial alibi because she & the Russians were involved in the abduction.

[Wonderfulspam]

I have to admire the way in which the 'proven sceptic fact' that a serial burglar was incapable of entering/exiting a dwelling through an unlocked ground floor window.  Particularly since the MWT documentary shows him and a Portuguese researcher? standing underneath an outside villa wall which Brueckner scaled with ease to gain access to his prey.

Bearing in mind he had packed his workbag and brought it with with him as his rape victim details in her police statement and the statement she made for his trial.  Proving this was not an opportunistic rape or a burglary gone wrong - it was planned.

But Brueckner crept in through the back.
Because the window wasn't open when Gerry checked & had found the door open further than he'd left it.
I wonder where Brueckner was hiding in the apartment?

[G-Unit]

its interesting that as regards the mccanns sceptics would not accept that absence of evidence is evidence of innocence. AS regards CB they seem to have done an about turn

There were enough 'indications' for the McCanns to be made arguido in order to ask them questions their answers to which may have incriminated them.

I don't know what 'indications' have led to Brueckner being made an arguido.

Are they strong enough to publicly name him as a murderer before he has even been questioned? I doubt it or the case would have progressed.

[Brietta]

I'm not a member of anything. I have indeed pointed out certain aspects of the McCanns evidence and behaviour which struck me as strange, and why not? I have never declared them guilty of any crime.

Brueckner's record suggests that he could have abducted and murdered Madeleine, but doesn't prove he did. The German prosecutor has, nevertheless, pronounced him guilty. The information he has released doesn't prove his guilt either. So it all rests on believing that the Germans have enough without any of that. If they do, then they need to charge him and submit their evidence for testing in a court of law imo.

I suggest you look up the dictionary definition of "coterie".


The Germans most certainly do not "need" to do anything.  Were that so - they would be doing it.

Presently they are investigating a number of crimes involving this suspect all within the law and I am sure that when or if they decide to lay charges they will do so.

All of that is outwith my remit and yours.

[Eleanor]

There were enough 'indications' for the McCanns to be made arguido in order to ask them questions their answers to which may have incriminated them.

I don't know what 'indications' have led to Brueckner being made an arguido.

Are they strong enough to publicly name him as a murderer before he has even been questioned? I doubt it or the case would have progressed.

Once you are an Arguido you don't have to answer questions.  So that didn't go well.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The alibi hasn't been confirmed but there is every possibility it might be. The fact that Brückner was definitely seeing this girl so far from Praia da Luz regularly each night during the the time that Madeleine disappeared renders it very unlikely he had anything to do with an abduction.

Definitely??  According to whom?

[Brietta]

There were enough 'indications' for the McCanns to be made arguido in order to ask them questions their answers to which may have incriminated them.

I don't know what 'indications' have led to Brueckner being made an arguido.

Are they strong enough to publicly name him as a murderer before he has even been questioned? I doubt it or the case would have progressed.

There were no indications which justified making the McCanns arguidps.  It was done at a time when the PJ could do so without let or hindrance since no evidence was required.

The situation is entirely different for Brueckner.  Portuguese law has changed and the requirement for firm evidence is required not a whim.

But you know that already.  Just another slur, which is really tiresome even for you.

Since MWT ninety minute programme just doesn't go there - neither should you.

[Brietta]

Interestingly MWT seems to think that Scotland Yard had a road block in place where they were taking photographs of the occupants of cars passing through. 

[Mr Gray]

There were enough 'indications' for the McCanns to be made arguido in order to ask them questions their answers to which may have incriminated them.

I don't know what 'indications' have led to Brueckner being made an arguido.

Are they strong enough to publicly name him as a murderer before he has even been questioned? I doubt it or the case would have progressed.

All the indications used to make the mccanns arguidos were not confirmed...do you remeber that.

The point still stands...is the perceived lack of evidence against CB evidence of innocence

[Vertigo Swirl]

There were enough 'indications' for the McCanns to be made arguido in order to ask them questions their answers to which may have incriminated them.

I don't know what 'indications' have led to Brueckner being made an arguido.

Are they strong enough to publicly name him as a murderer before he has even been questioned? I doubt it or the case would have progressed.

Were the McCanns made arguidos on the basis of "strong indications of the practice of a crime?"  I think not.

[Eleanor]

It seems to me that Brueckner endeavoured to set up an alibi for a planned abduction by telling this girlfriend that he was somewhere else on the 3rd of May.  She initially appears to have believed him. And then balked at  telling downright lies.

Not that any of this even remotely matters.  Brueckner's Alibi is dodgy.  A half decent Barrister will nail that.

Mark Williams Thomas has blown it again.

[Wonderfulspam]

It seems to me that Brueckner endeavoured to set up an alibi for a planned abduction by telling this girlfriend that he was somewhere else on the 3rd of May.  She initially appears to have believed him. And then balked at  telling downright lies.

Not that any of this even remotely matters.  Brueckner's Alibi is dodgy.  A half decent Barrister will nail that.

Mark Williams Thomas has blown it again.

When is the trial starting?

[Wonderfulspam]

Were the McCanns made arguidos on the basis of "strong indications of the practice of a crime?"  I think not.

He told a paedo in a chat room that he abducted Maddie & disposed of the evidence. That would do, with his previous, wouldn't It?

[Eleanor]

When is the trial starting?

Sometime after the several others pending.

[Wonderfulspam]

Sometime after the several others pending.

Not according to Wolters.
But maybe he's bluffing about that.