An Inept Investigation?

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

But words like arrogant and smugly are pertinent when given with No Evidence.  Some last ditch to God knows what.

Sorry, my thoughts on subject aren't the same as yours.  But no less pertinent.  There has never been any evidence against The McCanns.

The dog alerts and subsequent human cellular material collected is evidence - just not proof! You know, like the open window in 5A is evidence (of abduction or staging) but not proof.

[Mr Gray]

The dog alerts and subsequent human cellular material collected is evidence - just not proof! You know, like the open window in 5A is evidence (of abduction or staging) but not proof.

Then the fact that Maddie is missing is evidence of abduction

[barrier]

Then the fact that Maddie is missing is evidence of abduction

By, whom , how and when ? is the deal breaker, it ain't the german suspect.

[Mr Gray]

By, whom , how and when ? is the deal breaker, it ain't the german suspect.

You need to read my post in context

You seem to think you know more than those who have seen all the evidence. 

[barrier]

You need to read my post in context

You seem to think you know more than those who have seen all the evidence.

You seem to think you know more than a certain dog handler and a detective.

[jassi]

By, whom , how and when ? is the deal breaker, it ain't the german suspect.

I'd have thought it was only evidence   of possible abduction

[G-Unit]

Then the fact that Maddie is missing is evidence of abduction

No it isn't. It's evidence that something happened to her.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No it isn't. It's evidence that something happened to her.

Which includes abduction by a stranger, ergo it's evidence of abduction.  If and when abduction is proved would you say her being missing was not evidence of abduction?

[Wonderfulspam]

Which includes abduction by a stranger, ergo it's evidence of abduction.  If and when abduction is proved would you say her being missing was not evidence of abduction?

If she was abducted then yes it would be evidence of abduction.

But we're still missing the evidence of abduction bit.

[Mr Gray]

No it isn't. It's evidence that something happened to her.

You need to read my post in the  context it was made then you might understand it.  Note... My posts starts with... Then

[Mr Gray]

I'd have thought it was only evidence   of possible abduction

I think that's a fair point

[G-Unit]

Which includes abduction by a stranger, ergo it's evidence of abduction.  If and when abduction is proved would you say her being missing was not evidence of abduction?

It will be interesting to see how abduction by a stranger can be proved.

[Mr Gray]

It will be interesting to see how abduction by a stranger can be proved.

If wolters has photo/video of abuse ...similar to the Rui Pedro case...then that would prove abduction beyond reasonable doubt...either from the apt or the street

[barrier]

If wolters has photo/video of abuse ...similar to the Rui Pedro case...then that would prove abduction beyond reasonable doubt...either from the apt or the street

Nope it proves he has a image of such .(Not that he has)

Like I've said before, he came across the dead girl left by Smithy, prove he didn't mr Prosecutor. He's got nothing to tie his suspect, thats why he's not been questioned. He'll be questioned as a witness if anything imo.

[Mr Gray]

You seem to think you know more than a certain dog handler and a detective.

I  agree with just about everything Grime and Harrison have said. they reall havent claimed any facts....just intelligence.

can you quote one handler ...detective...who see the alerts as reliable evidence of a death in the apartment