An Inept Investigation?

[barrier]

Ah well you see, no one knew of this in those days.  No one knew that they could be pin pointed.

But Breckner's phone was there in Praia da Luz.  You may make what you like of that.

And Luz consists of one street where 5a was ? yeah right, they can't pinpoint it today unless following,  it pings in a general area.

[Eleanor]

Just as matter of interest.  I don't care.  I know that The McCanns had nothing to do with the disappearence of their daughter.

In fact I have long been looking at some members of The PJ. And I doubt that I am alone.  Something quite dreadful went on there.   Cristovao and Amaral were up to no good.

Do me a favour.  Sue me.

[barrier]

Just as matter of interest.  I don't care.  I know that The McCanns had nothing to do with the disappearence of their daughter.

In fact I have long been looking at some members of The PJ. And I doubt that I am alone.  Something quite dreadful went on there.   Cristovao and Amaral were up to no good.

Do me a favour.  Sue me.

Of course CB was in on it.

[Eleanor]

Of course CB was in on it.

Goodness me, do you actually think so?  And do you think he was alone?
 
But someone has to be brave enough to say so on this now misbegotten Forum.  I have been watching this Forum dying before my eyes.

[Mr Gray]

The telephone call is a piece of circumstantial evidence and on it's own means next to nothing. 

It's when it's combined with other evidence it could be important

[Eleanor]

I believe that Cristovao and Amaral had something much to do with this.  And I always have.

I  haven't talked about this because it is all a bit too much.  But if you look at these two then it is all there to see.

However,  whether or not I am allowed to say this is another matter all together.  But  I can't say that I actually care.

I expect that John will decide.

O'Connor says,  Don't f..k with my Mummy.

[barrier]

I believe that Cristovao and Amaral had something much to do with this.  And I always have.

I  haven't talked about this because it is all a bit too much.  But if you look at these two then it is all there to see.

However,  whether or not I am allowed to say this is another matter all together.  But  I can't say that I actually care.

I expect that John will decide.

O'Connor says,  Don't f..k with my Mummy.

Go for it, there are some on here who seem to think  that  Wolters has evidence of abuse of Madeleine which is likely to have led to her death without a slice of evidence.

Ive spelt it out several times...Im not really happy spelling it out. From what Wolters has said he has photographic evidence of MM being abused.This is the conclusion raeched by quite afew people following the case. Wolters has made arounf 5 indications his concrete evidence is photographic. He has inferred it shows abuse of MM that is so severe she would not have survived. ....but he does not have absolute proof she didnt.

This may sound far fetched but is exactly what happened in the Rui pedro case...another child abducted in portugal

[Mr Gray]

Go for it, there are some on here who seem to think  that  Wolters has evidence of abuse of Madeleine which is likely to have led to her death without a slice of evidence.

There is evidence for photographic evidence and evidence for what it describes.  I've posted it several times

[barrier]

There is evidence for photographic evidence and evidence for what it describes.  I've posted it several times

Marvin Gaye made a bit of money about hearing it through a grapevine.

[Mr Gray]

Marvin Gaye made a bit of money about hearing it through a grapevine.

No.. Directly from Wolters
You said no evidence to support my claims... You are clearly wrong

[G-Unit]

There is evidence for photographic evidence and evidence for what it describes.  I've posted it several times

I think you've just convinced yourself. There's no such evidence at all.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think you've just convinced yourself. There's no such evidence at all.

Wolters himself refused to rule out that he has video or photographic evidence, so that’s evidence he may have such evidence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

“He (Wolters) also admitted they did still have other key information in the Maddie investigation - ‘maybe video, maybe phone evidence’ - that hadn’t been released to the public, and it was not the time to confirm exactly what. ‘There are quite a lot of things I am still unable to tell you,’ he said.”

From Jon Clarke’s book.

[Mr Gray]

I think you've just convinced yourself. There's no such evidence at all.

What rubbish..... So you don't see Wolters himself saying that the evidence may be photographic as evidence

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters himself refused to rule out that he has video or photographic evidence, so that’s evidence he may have such evidence.

Yes, when asked he said he could neither confirm nor deny the existence of photographic evidence.

So obviously, that means he definitely has photographic evidence of Maddie being murdered by Brueckner.

"In a search of the deserted factory owned by Brückner, police found disturbing digital material including thousands of videos and pictures reportedly of his alleged crimes.

Cryptically, prosecutor Wolters would neither confirm or deny if any of these videos contained evidence of Madeleine McCann.

"At the moment, I'm not allowed to comment on that. So I'm not able to say if there are pictures or if there are no pictures of Madeleine,"

https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/german-prosecutors-believe-madeleine-mccann-is-dead-60-minutes/c12305de-2465-4751-98ae-e0ba468d8fa3