An Inept Investigation?

[jassi]

What rubbish..... So you don't see Wolters himself saying that the evidence may be photographic as evidence

Not sure why he needs to be so coy with his 'maybes'.
He either has photographic evidence, or he doesn't. He wouldn't be giving any secrets away by being more definite.

[jassi]

Yes, when asked he said he could neither confirm nor deny the existence of photographic evidence.

So obviously, that means he definitely has photographic evidence of Maddie being murdered by Brueckner.

"In a search of the deserted factory owned by Brückner, police found disturbing digital material including thousands of videos and pictures reportedly of his alleged crimes.

Cryptically, prosecutor Wolters would neither confirm or deny if any of these videos contained evidence of Madeleine McCann.

"At the moment, I'm not allowed to comment on that. So I'm not able to say if there are pictures or if there are no pictures of Madeleine,"

https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/german-prosecutors-believe-madeleine-mccann-is-dead-60-minutes/c12305de-2465-4751-98ae-e0ba468d8fa3

So that's a No then 

[Wonderfulspam]

So that's a No then 

He's not allowed to comment.

So that means a definite yes.

[barrier]

He's not allowed to comment.

So that means a definite yes.

Yes he can't comment, or no he can't comment.

[G-Unit]

How was this phoned identified as belonging to Brueckner ?
Was he foolish enough to use a phone registered in his name ?

Whatever, the release of the two numbers doesn't seem to have achieved anything, other than media publicity about Brueckner, which perhaps was really the purpose.

According to Wolters, they had 'other information' that CB had used that number. (Jon Clarke page 407). No doubt from his 'friends'.

[barrier]

According to Wolters, they had 'other information' that CB had used that number. (Jon Clarke page 407). No doubt from his 'friends'.

Is Wolter releasing information pertaining to a live investigation secure in the knowledge it'll never see the light of day in a court room.

[Wonderfulspam]

It does seem strange to be that he's not allowed to comment on the possible existence of evidence but is allowed to say the suspect is definitely guilty.

Is this the standard procedure within the German justice system?

[barrier]

It does seem strange to be that he's not allowed to comment on the possible existence of evidence but is allowed to say the suspect is definitely guilty.

Is this the standard procedure within the German justice system?

After forensically examining the phone records and after doing some landscaping, OG interviewed the three amigo's reportedly asking if they killed Madeleine yet at no time during this was any suspicion cast toward CB, are OG inept as well.

[jassi]

It does seem strange to be that he's not allowed to comment on the possible existence of evidence but is allowed to say the suspect is definitely guilty.

Is this the standard procedure within the German justice system?

Teutonic thoroughness, no doubt.
Declaration of guilt first, procurement of  evidence second.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, when asked he said he could neither confirm nor deny the existence of photographic evidence.

So obviously, that means he definitely has photographic evidence of Maddie being murdered by Brueckner.

"In a search of the deserted factory owned by Brückner, police found disturbing digital material including thousands of videos and pictures reportedly of his alleged crimes.

Cryptically, prosecutor Wolters would neither confirm or deny if any of these videos contained evidence of Madeleine McCann.

"At the moment, I'm not allowed to comment on that. So I'm not able to say if there are pictures or if there are no pictures of Madeleine,"

https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/german-prosecutors-believe-madeleine-mccann-is-dead-60-minutes/c12305de-2465-4751-98ae-e0ba468d8fa3

You're being facetious again (what's new?)  No one has claimed he DEFINITELY has these pictures, only that there is evidence that he may, by his own words - he hasn't ruled it out, therefore it remains a possibility.   Personally I doubt he has photos of Madeleine taken after 3rd May, but that's just my opinion. 

[Brietta]

I think you've just convinced yourself. There's no such evidence at all.

I think your distrust in the German claim to have evidence is quite extraordinary.


A new Spiegel TV documentary claimed girls' swimming costumes, children's clothes and 8,000 child abuse images were found by police. Brueckner does not have any children.

The swimwear and clothes were found in the red and white Tiffin Allegro Bay motorhome Brueckner bought in Germany in 2010, three years after Maddie's disappearance.

Computer memory sticks contained more than 8,000 files, mostly pictures and videos of child abuse, the documentary claimed.

It alleged some of the victims in the images were infants and about 100 of the files were photos of Brueckner partly naked or wearing black stockings and committing a sex act.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/house-horrors-maddie-suspects-friend-22219039

[jassi]

These are only claims by a TV company. We don't know how accurate they may be.

[Wonderfulspam]

These are only claims by a TV company. We don't know how accurate they may be.

How did Brueckner have private access to these girls?

There hasn't been a spate of child abductions that can account for them all & no reports of families leaving their children in the care of Brueckner.

And if you actually read the article...

"It is alleged some of the victims in the images were infants"

(So he probably had downloaded images of child porn he himself didn't make)

"....and about 100 of the files were photos of Brueckner partly naked or wearing black stockings and committing a sex act."

So in the photos he was committing a sex act, note it doesn't say anything about being against a child.

No, I'm sorry, until I get to view these images personally & privately I will continue to have doubts.

[jassi]

How did Brueckner have private access to these girls?

There hasn't been a spate of child abductions that can account for them all & no reports of families leaving their children in the care of Brueckner.

And if you actually read the article...

"It is alleged some of the victims in the images were infants"

(So he probably had downloaded images of child porn he himself didn't make)

"....and about 100 of the files were photos of Brueckner partly naked or wearing black stockings and committing a sex act."

So in the photos he was committing a sex act, note it doesn't say anything about being against a child.

No, I'm sorry, until I get to view these images personally & privately I will continue to have doubts.

 

[barrier]

You'll note that none of these allegations have been presented to a court, the legend has been writ alright.