An Inept Investigation?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Part of the rich tapestry of gender fluidity. 

being a paedophile or even a lover of paedophiles has nothing to do with gender fluidity.

[Wonderfulspam]

Lovely.

I thought you might approve, as most people should, because there's a chance I'll go around abducting,abusing & murdering child abusers.

[jassi]

How does he refute some thing not put to him ?

Equally, why should he ? What benefit does he gain by doing so ?

[Wonderfulspam]

being a paedophile or even a lover of paedophiles has nothing to do with gender fluidity.

There are arguments that paedophilia is a sexual orientation, although it's still classed as a mental illness.

But so were gender dysphoria & homosexuality until recently.

Obviously though, even if paedophilia is a natural sexual orientation (it is observed in some animal species), it will never be a socially acceptable one, in western societies anyway.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I thought you might approve, as most people should, because there's a chance I'll go around abducting,abusing & murdering child abusers.

You’re just being a silly sausage though now aren’t you?

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are arguments that paedophilia is a sexual orientation, although it's still classed as a mental illness.

But so were gender dysphoria & homosexuality until recently.

Obviously though, even if paedophilia is a natural sexual orientation (it is observed in some animal species), it will never be a socially acceptable one, in western societies anyway.

gender fluidity is about having no fixed gender and not about whose pants you want to gain access to.  Active paedophiles cause damage to children (who cannot legally consent anyway) through their actions therefore they will never be considered legal or acceptable imo. 

[barrier]

Equally, why should he ? What benefit does he gain by doing so ?

The only way he'll know of this is either through his lawyer, who would advise silence or the rag's, Bild is equivalent to the Sun , so you take any thing in that with some decent rock salt.

[Wonderfulspam]

gender fluidity is about having no fixed gender and not about whose pants you want to gain access to.  Active paedophiles cause damage to children (who cannot legally consent anyway) through their actions therefore they will never be considered legal or acceptable imo.

Yes, gender fluidity has nothing to do with orientation, that's why I'm in favour of the LGB community & exclude the T's & all the rest. I'm more a TERF.

A child can apparently make a mature decision & consent to taking gender bending hormones before they reach the age of sixteen, even against their parents wishes, & that's fine, but they can't legally choose to screw an older person.

Make it make sense.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, gender fluidity has nothing to do with orientation, that's why I'm in favour of the LGB community & exclude the T's & all the rest. I'm more a TERF.

A child can apparently make a mature decision & consent to taking gender bending hormones before they reach the age of sixteen, even against their parents wishes, & that's fine, but they can't legally choose to screw an older person.

Make it make sense.

I can’t.  I’m a TERF too.

[Wonderfulspam]

I can’t.  I’m a TERF too.

Glad to hear it.

Only women have a cervix.

Kier Starmer doesn't think so.

https://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/19605774.labour-leader-sir-keir-starmer-not-right-say-women-cervix/

If he didn't even bother paying attention in biology class then I'm not voting for him.

[jassi]

Yes, gender fluidity has nothing to do with orientation, that's why I'm in favour of the LGB community & exclude the T's & all the rest. I'm more a TERF.

A child can apparently make a mature decision & consent to taking gender bending hormones before they reach the age of sixteen, even against their parents wishes, & that's fine, but they can't legally choose to screw an older person.

Make it make sense.

What about someone of the same age ?

[Wonderfulspam]

What about someone of the same age ?

It is a criminal offence for anyone to be involved in any sexual act (sexual intercourse, sexual touching, kissing etc) with anyone under the age of 13 whether the young person agrees or not, on the basis that anyone under 13 lacks the capacity to give valid consent to any sexual act.


It is a criminal offence for anyone who is 16 or older to have any kind of sexual contact with someone aged 13, 14 or 15. It is also a criminal offence for both girls and boys aged 13, 14 and 15 to have consensual sex with anyone else aged 13, 14 or 15. This applies whether they are the initiating partner or the consenting partner. This criminal offence where both are aged 13, 14 or 15 applies solely to penetration of the mouth, vagina or anus with the penis and to touching of the penis vagina or anus with the mouth. People in this age group participating in other consensual sexual acts are not committing criminal offences.

[Wonderfulspam]

A 15 year old can't do stuff with their just 17 partner.

But they can swap sexes, but not smoke or drive.

The whole consenting to things issue is a bit messy imo.

[Mr Gray]

How does he refute some thing not put to him ?

We won't agree but he could make a statement through his lawyer saying why he isn't guilty... An alibi.. He hasn't because imo most likely he hasn't got one

[jassi]

At this stage he doesn't need an alibi, so why provide one ?