Author Topic: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"  (Read 133552 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #450 on: April 04, 2025, 10:27:56 PM »
There are many circumstantial cases and many convictions resulting from them. That’s why we have a Not Proven verdict in Scotland.

If Luke was trying to hide his identity something as simple as putting the hood up of the parka would have helped hide both his hair and his face. He didn’t do that. I wonder why? Further Luke wasn’t even ‘trying to get out of sight’. He was leaning on the gate as if he had all the time in the world. Surely taking off the parka and carrying on walking up the road would have drawn less attention to him…if he was the killer. Why stop?

According to you Shane made derogatory comments about his brother to you in a private conversation. From his past behaviour to have that made public is I’m sure the last thing he would have wanted. I feel sorry for Shane. He obviously doesn’t want to be the subject of public interest and yet you and people like you have got no respect for his privacy.
Yes, put the hood up or take the parka off alltogether, the same thoughts have crossed my mind, Faith!
Gee whiz, its common sense surely.
But as you say, he didn't try to hide his face nor the parka.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #451 on: April 04, 2025, 10:35:19 PM »
Gee whiz, its common sense surely.

Where's the common sense in taking a knife to meet your girlfriend and killing her?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #452 on: April 04, 2025, 10:40:47 PM »
Where's the common sense in taking a knife to meet your girlfriend and killing her?
Exactly.  You only have to look at the killing of Brianna Ghey to see an example of two young teenagers not really thinking through the consequences of their actions. To claim that all murderers would or wouldn’t do something is utterly absurd. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #453 on: April 04, 2025, 10:44:31 PM »
Where's the common sense in taking a knife to meet your girlfriend and killing her?
But Luke Mitchells actions on Newbattle Rd simply dont speak of guilt, Ken!
As Faith said, a boy in no panic to do anything other than stand there waiting for Jodi.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 10:54:26 PM by Joe Blogs »

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #454 on: April 04, 2025, 11:00:58 PM »
But Luke Mitchells actions on Newbattle Rd simply dont speak of guilt, Ken!
As Faith said, a boy in no panic to do anything other than stand there waiting for Jodi.
He was witnessed in a place he claimed not to be in. Whether he was standing by a gate or doing cartwheels is irrelevant - he claimed not to be there.

Why didn't he either phone her again or walk up the RDP to save waiting for an hour - the same impatient boy who chased up DH twice in half an hour. Don't be daft.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #455 on: April 04, 2025, 11:22:57 PM »
You don't know SM. It's not as those he's been accused of murder like at least 3 innocent people by SL & SF. Many others implicated without reason and pursued by a baying mob of idiots too stupid to think for themselves, all the while SL asks for money to further her "work" in shaming the victim's family. You couldn't make it up eh?

You and people like you have no respect for privacy constantly mentioning the J family when they were powerless to stop LM's actions in murdering their daughter.

Of course I don’t know Shane Mitchell. I don’t think that you do either.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #456 on: April 04, 2025, 11:23:19 PM »
He was witnessed in a place he claimed not to be in. Whether he was standing by a gate or doing cartwheels is irrelevant - he claimed not to be there.

Why didn't he either phone her again or walk up the RDP to save waiting for an hour - the same impatient boy who chased up DH twice in half an hour. Don't be daft.
Luke couldn't walk up the path incase Jodi took another route to get to Newbattle, Ken!
Luke showed the police a shortcut which he believed Jodi may take remember, and Scott Forbes pointed out another shortcut heading towards the Abbey I believe.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #457 on: April 04, 2025, 11:29:40 PM »
Luke couldn't walk up the path incase Jodi took another route to get to Newbattle, Ken!
Luke showed the police a shortcut which he believed Jodi may take remember, and Scott Forbes pointed out another shortcut heading towards the Abbey I believe.
The fact you mentioned a complete idiot like Forbes is pretty desperate. She never ventured down the RDP as they were witnessed at EH end. No one in their right mind would attempt a different route, nevermind a teenage girl.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2025, 10:47:51 AM by Kenmair »

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #458 on: April 04, 2025, 11:33:08 PM »
Of course I don’t know Shane Mitchell. I don’t think that you do either.
Never claimed to know him, only been his company a few times a few years ago. You'll know best though.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #459 on: April 04, 2025, 11:36:00 PM »
He was witnessed in a place he claimed not to be in. Whether he was standing by a gate or doing cartwheels is irrelevant - he claimed not to be there.

Why didn't he either phone her again or walk up the RDP to save waiting for an hour - the same impatient boy who chased up DH twice in half an hour. Don't be daft.

He was allegedly seen waiting across from the lane where his girlfriend would have exited from RDP. Why not just admit that he’d been waiting there? After all it would certainly have been one of the places that it wouldn’t be suspicious for him to be waiting and he knew that he’d been seen.

Why didn’t he phone Jodi again? You are aware that she didn’t have a phone, aren’t you? Further he already knew that she wasn’t at her house so what was the point of calling there? Of course he could also have been wary of annoying Jodi’s mum or her boyfriend by ringing again when they had already told him that she’d left.

Ovens went into the kitchen and told Judith that her daughter still hadn’t met Luke some 50 minutes after she had left even though she only had to walk a short distance. Why didn’t she ring Luke back?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #460 on: April 04, 2025, 11:45:25 PM »
Never claimed to know him, only been his company a few times a few years ago. You'll know best though.

Don’t be dishonest if you don’t have a good memory.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #461 on: April 04, 2025, 11:50:12 PM »
The fact you mentioned a complete idiot like Forbes is pretty desperate. She never ventured down the RDP as they were witnessed at EH end. No one in their right mind would attempt a different route, nevermind a teenage girl.

How's your community garden coming on? Will you be the treasurer Sandra?

Bryson’s evidence has been well and truly debunked. Remember Findlay commenting that she’d mentioned a ‘waist length jacket’ in her statements several times? That’s not a parka, is it?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #462 on: April 04, 2025, 11:50:34 PM »
Why didn’t he phone Jodi again? You are aware that she didn’t have a phone, aren’t you? Further he already knew that she wasn’t at her house so what was the point of calling there? Of course he could also have been wary of annoying Jodi’s mum or her boyfriend by ringing again when they had already told him that she’d left.
Because he'd already killed her and was trying to create an alibi, but as always, if in doubt blame the family. It's getting a bit "why did the murderer cross the road?" and the replies more outlandish every time. I think yourself and JB Lean should get together and write a book. "Our Struggle (in defending a teenage killer)".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #463 on: April 04, 2025, 11:53:00 PM »
He was allegedly seen waiting across from the lane where his girlfriend would have exited from RDP. Why not just admit that he’d been waiting there? After all it would certainly have been one of the places that it wouldn’t be suspicious for him to be waiting and he knew that he’d been seen.

Why didn’t he phone Jodi again? You are aware that she didn’t have a phone, aren’t you? Further he already knew that she wasn’t at her house so what was the point of calling there? Of course he could also have been wary of annoying Jodi’s mum or her boyfriend by ringing again when they had already told him that she’d left.

Ovens went into the kitchen and told Judith that her daughter still hadn’t met Luke some 50 minutes after she had left even though she only had to walk a short distance. Why didn’t she ring Luke back?
Good post. Faith!
That all makes perfect sense to me.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Laughable eyewitness testimony"
« Reply #464 on: April 04, 2025, 11:55:12 PM »
Don’t be dishonest if you don’t have a good memory.
Care to expand? My memory is fine. You come across as bitter and twisted to anyone that doesn't agree with you and try and put down various posters as inferior to you.

Madam Superior or Millie Tant?