Author Topic: Maddie Basta de Mentiras  (Read 46386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #210 on: October 14, 2021, 05:33:52 PM »
They did sack Amaral from the case though.

Of course they did. What's that got to do with his interpretation of evidence?

He was replaced and the investigation went in a different direction. Failed to achieve anything, so maybe that approach was wrong.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #211 on: October 14, 2021, 05:37:22 PM »
Is this really the best that Amaral can do ... apparently tailoring his narrative to mirror the ravings of hate sites with uncorroborated meanderings borrowed from him in the first instance.  How utterly boring it all is.

The Germans will move at their own pace and I think their intervention will prove to be the decisive factor or not as the case may be.
In the meantime the aficionados can hang around waiting for the English edition of Amaral's second cashing in using Madeleine.  The person is quite as shameless as he is deranged I think.

It has crossed my mind that Amaral is mad.

Offline Brietta

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #212 on: October 14, 2021, 05:50:37 PM »
Of course they did. What's that got to do with his interpretation of evidence?

He was replaced and the investigation went in a different direction. Failed to achieve anything, so maybe that approach was wrong.

You've summed it up quite succinctly there.  He based his original book on flawed evidence which he seems to have reprised in his current one.

I think the only 'information' from it which might be of interest - is the episode containing information referring to the PJ conduct regarding Brueckner and what happened after they knocked his door and found he wasn't at home.

Is there there such a chapter one wonders?

Is there such an explanation?

If not ~ one wonders why not.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #213 on: October 14, 2021, 05:52:42 PM »
It has crossed my mind that Amaral is mad.

I believe that to be so but with the addition of "bad".  I think it is the only explanation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #214 on: October 14, 2021, 06:17:55 PM »
It has crossed my mind that Amaral is mad.
Vindictive and not very bright - a lethal combination.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #215 on: October 14, 2021, 10:07:57 PM »
It would seem that the new book is a compendium of all the daftest theories about this case that you can already laugh at on sceptic sites.  Save yer money folks!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #216 on: October 15, 2021, 12:09:45 AM »
Perhaps it would be helpful if we hope to ever reach the sophistication and maturity of discussion on other forms such as Websleuths that we take the debate out of the playground. Name calling makes for a rather childish alternative to proper, adult debate, don’t you think?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Myster

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #217 on: October 15, 2021, 05:52:56 AM »
Perhaps it would be helpful if we hope to ever reach the sophistication and maturity of discussion on other forms such as Websleuths that we take the debate out of the playground. Name calling makes for a rather childish alternative to proper, adult debate, don’t you think?
Really?... Scroll to the bottom of the page and read yesterday's admin note...

https://www.websleuths.com/forums/threads/madeleine-mccann-german-prisoner-identified-as-suspect-26.592806/page-14
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #218 on: October 15, 2021, 09:00:16 AM »
Really?... Scroll to the bottom of the page and read yesterday's admin note...

https://www.websleuths.com/forums/threads/madeleine-mccann-german-prisoner-identified-as-suspect-26.592806/page-14

Websleuths is much more heavily Moderated than This Forum.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #219 on: October 15, 2021, 09:20:20 AM »
Websleuths is much more heavily Moderated than This Forum.
Oh, I don't know....my perfectly legitimate comment was moderated earlier today....  8)--))
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Myster

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #220 on: October 15, 2021, 09:29:02 AM »
Websleuths is much more heavily Moderated than This Forum.
Being a huge worldwide forum originating in the US in 1999 with far more cases than here, no doubt there are many (including mods) there with too much free time on their hands.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Myster

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #221 on: October 15, 2021, 09:31:29 AM »
Oh, I don't know....my perfectly legitimate comment was moderated earlier today....  8)--))
Not guilty, and Ellie was too busy having a first cuppa of the day and filling up her woodburning stove.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #222 on: October 15, 2021, 09:35:49 AM »
Being a huge worldwide forum originating in the US in 1999 with far more cases than here, no doubt there are many (including mods) there with too much free time on their hands.

I don't know.  I've lost the plot these days so I tend to follow your lead.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #223 on: October 15, 2021, 09:38:07 AM »
Not guilty, and Ellie was too busy having a first cuppa of the day and filling up her woodburning stove.

Not to forget feeding the rotten little horror story, so you can add moping up pee to that.

Offline Myster

Re: Maddie Basta de Mentiras
« Reply #224 on: October 15, 2021, 09:44:54 AM »
I don't know.  I've lost the plot these days so I tend to follow your lead.
Well, I'm off now for the rest of today, juggling a couple of DIY projects.  Much healthier than sat watching this never-ending, tit-for-tat merry-go-round.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.