Author Topic: Anectdotal witness evidence  (Read 40868 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #105 on: December 26, 2021, 11:37:50 PM »
He was guilty but I showed that it was quite a simple and excusable breach ..the Dean did it inadvertently

Dyslexia is a seperate issue and the college needs to make allowances and offer extra help.  Failure to do so is a breach of the equality act and damages have no limit

I didn't think a person could be accused of plagiarism when speaking, but as a Dean is basically an administrator maybe she didn't realise that.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #106 on: December 26, 2021, 11:38:24 PM »
In other parts of the hospital chairs provided..

I'm not over concerned about it but I don't like to be treated badly and I do like a good argument.

My wife ordered some glasses and was told they would be two weeks.. Three weeks later still no appt and told due to civid perhaps two more weeks.

The same staff deliver glasses and help you choosebwheen you make the order . I rang and asked for an appt for a test and to choose some new glasses... They said they'd had a canc and could see me the following day.  I said it would be better if they gave the appt to my wife.. They agreed to see her the following day

What part of the hospital were you in where there were no chairs provided?

I’m not sure why you included the anecdote about your wife. Could you please explain in what way it’s related to the chair incident?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #107 on: December 27, 2021, 12:44:28 AM »
If my parents came from Lesotho but I was born in the UK then I would not be britsh.  That sentence is quite accurate.

I did latin at, school... The confusion may well be because would can apply to more than one tense.. Past future perfect for example as opposed to simply past tense.  As your mother tongue is not English you may not understand that.. Should I start a new thread

You are skating on thin ice atm. If we use your Lesotho example and use it in the real world.
Bukayo Saka, English footballer, born in Ealing from Nigerian immigrant parents, played for England in Euro 2020. Is he not English/British? He certainly sounds as English as me and he chose to play for England with these words

"My whole family has been in England like forever, it would be very strange for me to adapt to an environment that I had never been in since growing up.
"When I grew up all my documents stated that I am English. Hopefully Nigerian people will understand.
 
He received a lot of racist abuse stating he wasn’t English after missing the penalty in the final. Is he not English?

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #108 on: December 27, 2021, 12:46:05 AM »
If my parents came from Lesotho but I was born in the UK then I would not be britsh.  That sentence is quite accurate.

I did latin at, school... The confusion may well be because would can apply to more than one tense.. Past future perfect for example as opposed to simply past tense.  As your mother tongue is not English you may not understand that.. Should I start a new thread

What in gods green earth has the past future perfect got anything to do with what you wrote, You clearly use would in the past tense and if anything the structure of the sentence is in the 2nd conditional. Unless you would like to correct me and show me that your sentence has anything to do with the past future perfect.

Also I never said my mother’s tongue is not English, I have no idea where you got that information.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #109 on: December 27, 2021, 07:47:06 AM »
You are skating on thin ice atm. If we use your Lesotho example and use it in the real world.
Bukayo Saka, English footballer, born in Ealing from Nigerian immigrant parents, played for England in Euro 2020. Is he not English/British? He certainly sounds as English as me and he chose to play for England with these words

"My whole family has been in England like forever, it would be very strange for me to adapt to an environment that I had never been in since growing up.
"When I grew up all my documents stated that I am English. Hopefully Nigerian people will understand.
 
He received a lot of racist abuse stating he wasn’t English after missing the penalty in the final. Is he not English?
Is English his mother tongue?  I bet you would never dare ask him such a question so why did you see fit to put Davel down with such an insult?  C’mon mate, you started this diabolical and imo racist nonsense by disrespecting Davel, now own it.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #110 on: December 27, 2021, 09:34:06 AM »
What in gods green earth has the past future perfect got anything to do with what you wrote, You clearly use would in the past tense and if anything the structure of the sentence is in the 2nd conditional. Unless you would like to correct me and show me that your sentence has anything to do with the past future perfect.

Also I never said my mother’s tongue is not English, I have no idea where you got that information.
I'm actually winding you up.  I mentioned latin because its quite a precise language whereas English isn't.

If a child is born in the UK  from Botswanan parents he would not be English.  That is a correct statement.  He would not be English and not entitled to UK passport.  He could eventually apply for s UK passport having lived here fir a certain amount if years.
Your problem is you sre taking your definition of being English and thinking its the only one.

As regards football it's different.  I could play play for Ireland.. Even though I wasn't born there.. Do not have an Irish passport  ..I have a UK passport.  Does that make me Irish...

I think you should get back on topic and stop trying to prove you are an expert in everything.  All you have dine is make yourself look a bit fiolish.. Imo

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #111 on: December 27, 2021, 09:37:35 AM »
What part of the hospital were you in where there were no chairs provided?

I’m not sure why you included the anecdote about your wife. Could you please explain in what way it’s related to the chair incident?

I'm surprised you miss it's relevance.
It's another example of people using covid as an excuse... And another example of me catching them out using quite a novel method
« Last Edit: December 27, 2021, 09:41:43 AM by Davel »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #112 on: December 27, 2021, 09:46:26 AM »
You are skating on thin ice atm. If we use your Lesotho example and use it in the real world.
Bukayo Saka, English footballer, born in Ealing from Nigerian immigrant parents, played for England in Euro 2020. Is he not English/British? He certainly sounds as English as me and he chose to play for England with these words

"My whole family has been in England like forever, it would be very strange for me to adapt to an environment that I had never been in since growing up.
"When I grew up all my documents stated that I am English. Hopefully Nigerian people will understand.
 
He received a lot of racist abuse stating he wasn’t English after missing the penalty in the final. Is he not English?

Getting back on topic.. You claimed that Grime claimed Eddie had never had a false alert and the full stop before talking about road kill meant he wasn't talking about road kill or food.
You are absolutely wrong and I am absolutely right. In his white paper Grime explains what he means by a false positive and it's precisely what I said. 

Many sceptics clain Eddie has, 100% record based on this.. They are wrong
« Last Edit: December 27, 2021, 10:06:47 AM by Davel »

Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #113 on: December 27, 2021, 10:24:12 AM »
Getting back on topic.. You claimed that Grime claimed Eddie had never had a false alert and the full stop before talking about road kill meant he wasn't talking about road kill or food.
You are absolutely wrong and I am absolutely right. In his white paper Grime explains what he means by a false positive and it's precisely what I said. 

Many sceptics clain Eddie has, 100% record based on this.. They are wrong

The white paper says;

A false positive is an alert to a known and negative stimulous such as foodstuff or roadkill.
An unproductive positive is where there is no obvious stimulus but the response cannot be ruled incorrect. This would include the alert in the main bedroom of 5A.
(5.2 & 5.3)
http://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/4750/
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #114 on: December 27, 2021, 10:29:24 AM »
The white paper says;

A false positive is an alert to a known and negative stimulous such as foodstuff or roadkill.
An unproductive positive is where there is no obvious stimulus but the response cannot be ruled incorrect. This would include the alert in the main bedroom of 5A.
(5.2 & 5.3)
http://eprints.staffs.ac.uk/4750/

So a false positive is an alert to foodstuff as I've always maintained... It does not mean eddie has, 100% recird

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #115 on: December 27, 2021, 10:45:33 AM »
I'm actually winding you up.  I mentioned latin because its quite a precise language whereas English isn't.

If a child is born in the UK  from Botswanan parents he would not be English.  That is a correct statement.  He would not be English and not entitled to UK passport.  He could eventually apply for s UK passport having lived here fir a certain amount if years.
Your problem is you sre taking your definition of being English and thinking its the only one.

As regards football it's different.  I could play play for Ireland.. Even though I wasn't born there.. Do not have an Irish passport  ..I have a UK passport.  Does that make me Irish...

I think you should get back on topic and stop trying to prove you are an expert in everything.  All you have dine is make yourself look a bit fiolish.. Imo

 The way you phrase it above gives it the context that you mean you wouldn’t be British at that point of time ie. birth. But to post

If my parents came from Lesotho but I was born in the UK then I would not be britsh

gives a whole lot darker connotation, but I am prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not saying people like myself or Mr Saka whose parents were born outside of England would not be able to call themselves English. I would never stoop so low as to accuse someone of posting racist opinions unless I was 100% convinced that was their intention. I find that beyond contempt.

But you should know by the way you are still incorrect as a mother or father from Lesotho(or anywhere) who immigrates to England and either of them achieves settled status with the Home Office any children born to them in England will be automatically granted British citizenship.


Offline G-Unit

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #116 on: December 27, 2021, 10:47:00 AM »
So a false positive is an alert to foodstuff as I've always maintained... It does not mean eddie has, 100% recird

He's never alerted to those items according to Grime.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #117 on: December 27, 2021, 10:59:12 AM »
Getting back on topic.. You claimed that Grime claimed Eddie had never had a false alert and the full stop before talking about road kill meant he wasn't talking about road kill or food.
You are absolutely wrong and I am absolutely right. In his white paper Grime explains what he means by a false positive and it's precisely what I said. 

Many sceptics clain Eddie has, 100% record based on this.. They are wrong

He did claim it

'False' positives are always a possibility; to date Eddie has not so indicated
operationally or in training.


But who would know 11 years later he would define a false positive to exclude an alert when nothing was there.

Any definition I have seen of false positive would include these. I have been let down by my knowledge of logic and punctuation
But I like to be fair and I will say well done Davel, this one time you may have been right.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #118 on: December 27, 2021, 11:25:46 AM »
He did claim it

'False' positives are always a possibility; to date Eddie has not so indicated
operationally or in training.


But who would know 11 years later he would define a false positive to exclude an alert when nothing was there.

Any definition I have seen of false positive would include these. I have been let down by my knowledge of logic and punctuation
But I like to be fair and I will say well done Davel, this one time you may have been right.

You ate not being fair... I am right.. Not may be right. As I said it would be impossible to clsim Eddie has never given a false positive.  Another thing I would vritiise grime for. Is not stopping these rumours by clarifying things.

Perhaps Grime had so much faith in his dogs he actually believes the mccanns are guilty. I was surprised to see something in his white paper which would support.. But not confirm this

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Anectdotal witness evidence
« Reply #119 on: December 27, 2021, 11:33:46 AM »
You ate not being fair... I am right.. Not may be right. As I said it would be impossible to clsim Eddie has never given a false positive.  Another thing I would vritiise grime for. Is not stopping these rumours by clarifying things.

Perhaps Grime had so much faith in his dogs he actually believes the mccanns are guilty. I was surprised to see something in his white paper which would support.. But not confirm this

No I think you may be right is accurate, as Grime doesn't cover Eddies success rate with unproductive alerts. It is an unknown equation.
But here is the difference between you and I, you have presented evidence that supports your claim that Grimes claim of no false alerts refers only to foodstuffs and I accept your evidence makes this the most likely case.
But however when you are presented with the irrefutable evidence that dog alerts have been heard in court in many cases in various countries your reply is well they were only admitted because they were not challenged.
You have no evidence this is the case but it is a mantra you have stuck by for the 2 years I have been here and before.