Anectdotal witness evidence

[Mr Gray]

I assumed it was an attempt at an ellipsis, but even that is wrong. An ellipsis is three dots,
And what does the ellipsis mean in the context of the sentence, what words were you missing out?

Having said that the statements are anectdotal witness statements which when it suits you.. You place a lot of credibility

If you think that was a well crafted sentence you are wrong. Its a dogs dinner.

In your very limited opinion.. I think you are sounding extremely desperate and a bit of a fool in your attempts to show you have the upper hand.. You dont dont

[Mr Gray]

What speaks volumes for me is that despite Grimes claim he's been working on his project for 16 years tjete have only been four cases in the UK where the dogs have featured... Tjats a pretty abysmal rate

[Icanhandlethetruth]

In your very limited opinion.. I think you are sounding extremely desperate and a bit of a fool in your attempts to show you have the upper hand.. You dont dont

It would be easier for you just to clarify what your post meant because I have no idea.

Having said that the statements are anectdotal witness statements which when it suits you.. You place a lot of credibility

But keep them personal insults coming,
limited opinion,
fool,
desperate.

Its lucky you don't participate in the sniping because just imagine if you did.

[Mr Gray]

It would be easier for you just to clarify what your post meant because I have no idea.

Having said that the statements are anectdotal witness statements which when it suits you.. You place a lot of credibility

But keep them personal insults coming,
limited opinion,
fool,
desperate.

Its lucky you don't participate in the sniping because just imagine if you did.

Its of no importance to me whether you understand it or not

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Its of no importance to me whether you understand it or not

OK, fair enough. Lets have a recap on the theme of the thread.

You think it wouldn't add any support to a dog alert if a witness testified she had seen a missing girl enter into a neighbours house where a dog alerted and stated that she never saw her leave.

And your best example of anecdotal evidence is a clairvoyant giving her spiel to an audience.

Does that cover it?

[Mr Gray]

OK, fair enough. Lets have a recap on the theme of the thread.

You think it wouldn't add any support to a dog alert if a witness testified she had seen a missing girl enter into a neighbours house where a dog alerted and stated that she never saw her leave.

And your best example of anecdotal evidence is a clairvoyant giving her spiel to an audience.

Does that cover it?

No... Not at all

[Icanhandlethetruth]

No... Not at all

Covers it for me.

Brietta censored my words here.

Plus IMO you place great weight on the words of the family of a man serving time for a murder, they cant be biased can they?
Job done.

[Mr Gray]

Covers it for me.

Plus IMO you place great weight on the words of the family of a man serving time for a murder, they cant be biased can they?
Job done.

You obviously don't understand how I reach my conclusions... You think you do.. But you dont

[Icanhandlethetruth]

You obviously don't understand how I reach my conclusions... You think you do.. But you dont

I honestly have no idea how you reach your conclusions.

[Mr Gray]

I honestly have no idea how you reach your conclusions.

You've just claimed you do

[Icanhandlethetruth]

You've just claimed you do

These aren't really conclusions just statements that you have made.
I have no idea how your mind works.

[Mr Gray]

These aren't really conclusions just statements that you have made.
I have no idea how your mind works.

So my statement Re the SCCRC is not a conclusion.  None of my opinions Re Grime or Wolters are conclusions

[Icanhandlethetruth]

So my statement Re the SCCRC is not a conclusion.  None of my opinions Re Grime or Wolters are conclusions

conclusion:

a judgement or decision reached by reasoning.

Definitely not concerning the SCCRC, there is no reasoning there and I never raised anything you said about about Grime or Wolters in my recap.

[Mr Gray]

As regards the alert in a neighbours house..
If the handler was taken to ten empty houses and given no information.... And an alert was only made in the house where a child disappeared from

That would be significant

[Mr Gray]

conclusion:

a judgement or decision reached by reasoning.

Definitely not concerning the SCCRC, there is no reasoning there and I never raised anything you said about about Grime or Wolters in my recap.

My conclusion on the SCCRC is based on reasoning