The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[Eleanor]

If they are at the stage of preparing charges the defence will be aware.

Action is being taken against the journalist only regarding the two dead dogs - absolutely nothing else - as far as I can see.

Oh God, here we go again.  What happened to the Two Dead Dogs, other than the fact that they are dead, that is.

[G-Unit]

It most certainly is.

Was this partial print actually attributed to Brueckner, or is it just that a print was found ?

According to Jon Clarke, the partial fingerprint was Brueckner's;
https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2022/01/20/exclusive-new-madeleine-clues-linking-german-paedophile-handed-to-police-from-hard-hitting-tv-documentary/

[jassi]

According to the (Olive press) he's going to be charged with several crimes in February.
Well we're into February now, so we should soon find out if they are correct.

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2021/12/24/exclusive-explosive-fingerprint-clue-as-madeleine-mccann-suspect-faces-three-new-charges/

[Vertigo Swirl]

According to Jon Clarke, the partial fingerprint was Brueckner's;
https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2022/01/20/exclusive-new-madeleine-clues-linking-german-paedophile-handed-to-police-from-hard-hitting-tv-documentary/

You claimed earlier today that the report was fake news - upon what basis did you arrive at this conclusion?

[Vertigo Swirl]

According to Jon Clarke, the partial fingerprint was Brueckner's;
https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2022/01/20/exclusive-new-madeleine-clues-linking-german-paedophile-handed-to-police-from-hard-hitting-tv-documentary/

Is this report not simply a regurgitation of the German documentary, or are you claiming Jon Clarke made up the claim about the finger print in the first instance?

[G-Unit]

During the TV talk, Rabe also said that in two other cases against B. for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child, the public prosecutor's office probably had fingerprints and DNA traces. According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate". Rabe did not want to comment on the matter when asked, the presumption of innocence applies.


https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_91606732/maddie-mccann-verdaechtiger-entfuehrer-klagt-gegen-tv-journalistin.html

[Brietta]

During the TV talk, Rabe also said that in two other cases against B. for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child, the public prosecutor's office probably had fingerprints and DNA traces. According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate". Rabe did not want to comment on the matter when asked, the presumption of innocence applies.


https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_91606732/maddie-mccann-verdaechtiger-entfuehrer-klagt-gegen-tv-journalistin.html

                         
                                                  "probably"

Wonder if that means "mibbes yes" or "mibbes no" ~ or if it is a mistranslation?

By the way - Brueckner's lawyer is claiming nothing but the cruelty to dogs allegation - unless you know better!

[Vertigo Swirl]

During the TV talk, Rabe also said that in two other cases against B. for raping an Irish woman and abusing a child, the public prosecutor's office probably had fingerprints and DNA traces. According to an e-mail from the public prosecutor's office, from which Fülscher quotes, these details are "inaccurate". Rabe did not want to comment on the matter when asked, the presumption of innocence applies.


https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/panorama/kriminalitaet/id_91606732/maddie-mccann-verdaechtiger-entfuehrer-klagt-gegen-tv-journalistin.html

Which bit is inaccurate?  The DNA traces, the fingerprints, or what?  I take it you accept Fulscher's word unquestioningly?

[Eleanor]

This is getting utterly ridiculous now.  But the longer it goes on then the more obvious it becomes that Brueckner was involved.

But then this is what it is all about.  How long it takes is of the least importance.

[jassi]

This is getting utterly ridiculous now.  But the longer it goes on then the more obvious it becomes that Brueckner was involved.

But then this is what it is all about.  How long it takes is of the least importance.

Involved in what ?
There are so many accusations flying about and yet he is currently charged with nothing.

[Brietta]

This is getting utterly ridiculous now.  But the longer it goes on then the more obvious it becomes that Brueckner was involved.

But then this is what it is all about.  How long it takes is of the least importance.

It has already taken fifteen years so a little longer isn't going to make all that much difference except to the suspect and to Madeleine's family.

The only other vested interest is the one which doesn't want anyone to ever know for certain what happened to Madeleine and in my opinion that is one Hell of a burden they have chosen to be carrying through life.

[Brietta]

Involved in what ?
There are so many accusations flying about and yet he is currently charged with nothing.

The Germans are quite steadfast in that

• Madeleine is dead
• Madeleine was murdered by Brueckner

That is enough of an accusation to be going on with and left to themselves that is precisely what the Germans are doing.

[Eleanor]

It has already taken fifteen years so a little longer isn't going to make all that much difference except to the suspect and to Madeleine's family.

The only other vested interest is the one which doesn't want anyone to ever know for certain what happened to Madeleine and in my opinion that is one Hell of a burden they have chosen to be carrying through life.

Those who deliberately defend Brueckner aren't doing him or theirselves any favours, but I doubt they will worry about this ultimately.  These people will just disappear off The Internet if Brueckner is found Guilty.  So don't expect an apology.  Most of them don't even believe the rubbish they spout.  They are just not very nice people.

[jassi]

Why would anyone want to remain after the case has been resolved ?

[Brietta]

Why would anyone want to remain after the case has been resolved ?

At the moment they are here because they can't reconcile themselves to the fact of the direction in which Madeleine's case has inexorably turned.

If charges are laid and Brueckner faces trial as a result and is found guilty Madeleine's case will continue to reverberate throughout the internet much as it has already - as long as the driving force behind it considers it still to be of use.

Watch this space!