The known facts and the speculations featuring Brueckner, the prime suspect

[The General]

No you didn't.  I would read your comment again if I were you.

On the wind up again, already?
I got your 'joke', dismissed it and replied giving you the chance to draw a veil over your ignominy.
Never mind. I tried to help.

Anyway, back to the topic.....

[Eleanor]

On the wind up again, already?
I got your 'joke', dismissed it and replied giving you the chance to draw a veil over your ignominy.
Never mind. I tried to help.

Anyway, back to the topic.....

Basic Grammar.  There is.  There are.

[Vertigo Swirl]

All well within the rules - at least my posts are.
I'm not attacking any poster. I'm not insulting any poster.

The same cannot be said for some of your lot.

IMO

You've had your fair share of warnings, you must have done SOMETHING wrong at some point!

[Brietta]

Why should anyone believe him might be a more apposite question here.

I thought it interesting that from extensive coverage of heinous crimes attributed to him the only issue which appeared to rattle his cage was dated discussion of him leaving his dogs to die in his kiosk while he was on a jaunt to Portugal.

Why not sue the press when it was initially reported by them?

[Mr Gray]

All well within the rules - at least my posts are.
I'm not attacking any poster. I'm not insulting any poster.

The same cannot be said for some of your lot.

IMO

Remember when you referred to me as a two bit dentist from Wolverhampton. I think you and other posters are blind to your own behaviour. I bet you would find it nigh impossible to find an insult I've made to you.. Lol

[jassi]

Remember when you referred to me as a two bit dentist from Wolverhampton. I think you and other posters are blind to your own behaviour. I bet you would find it nigh impossible to find an insult I've made to you.. Lol

But I thought that's what you were, so no insult - just a case of mistaken identity. 

[The General]

I thought it interesting that from extensive coverage of heinous crimes attributed to him the only issue which appeared to rattle his cage was dated discussion of him leaving his dogs to die in his kiosk while he was on a jaunt to Portugal.

Why not sue the press when it was initially reported by them?

His legal team have cherry picked the low hanging fruit. This one's easy and the first of many. Unless she can provide proof of the 'libel' then she's toast.
This is a mere flexing of legal muscle, nothing more.

[jassi]

His legal team have cherry picked the low hanging fruit. This one's easy and the first of many. Unless she can provide proof of the 'libel' then she's toast.
This is a mere flexing of legal muscle, nothing more.

There is also the fact that other issues are under police investigation, whereas, as far as I know, he's not being investigated for cruelty to animals.

[Eleanor]

All well within the rules - at least my posts are.
I'm not attacking any poster. I'm not insulting any poster.

The same cannot be said for some of your lot.

IMO

I have never attacked you.  I cannot answer for anyone else.

[Eleanor]

I thought it interesting that from extensive coverage of heinous crimes attributed to him the only issue which appeared to rattle his cage was dated discussion of him leaving his dogs to die in his kiosk while he was on a jaunt to Portugal.

Why not sue the press when it was initially reported by them?

Oh God, he didn't do that, did he?

[Eleanor]

But I thought that's what you were, so no insult - just a case of mistaken identity. 

So you thought that's who Davel was, which you think was acceptable?  Goodness me.

[Eleanor]

There is also the fact that other issues are under police investigation, whereas, as far as I know, he's not being investigated for cruelty to animals.

Does cruelty to animals even matter?

[jassi]

Does cruelty to animals even matter?

The French seem to think so. Some animal welfare organisation is trying to prosecute a footballer for kicking his cat.

[jassi]

So you thought that's who Davel was, which you think was acceptable?  Goodness me.

In retrospect, probably not, but I'm now   a reformed character.

They say there's nothing like a repentant sinner and I have to say I'm nothing like a repentant sinner   

[Mr Gray]

But I thought that's what you were, so no insult - just a case of mistaken identity. 

I'm not in the slightest offended... But two bit is an attempt... A poor attempt at that. at an insult
Just pointing out your hypocrisy