It has taken fifteen years ~ is Madeleine's case close to being solved?

[Wonderfulspam]

Brueckner would have to have been raving mad to do it again.  Mind you, I haven't discounted that possibility.

Why?

It thrilled him so much he couldn't wait to boast to his mates about it & he got clean away.

Do you have any particular abductions & murders he might also committed in mind or was this just a hopeful blanket statement?

[Wonderfulspam]

As I've said this morning you are just making yourself look foolish

This is projection on your part.

You're accepting something as fact with scant evidence to support it, but tick tick & all that, Wolters is going to prove me wrong any day now.

[Eleanor]

Why?

It thrilled him so much he couldn't wait to boast to his mates about it & he got clean away.

Do you have any particular abductions & murders he might also committed in mind or was this just a hopeful blanket statement?

I haven't discounted the possibility that he is raving mad.

[Eleanor]

This is projection on your part.

You're accepting something as fact with scant evidence to support it, but tick tick & all that, Wolters is going to prove me wrong any day now.

You were proven wrong about The Alibi.

[barrier]

You were proven wrong about The Alibi.

Until /or it gets to court no one will know what is right or wrong .

[Rossb]

Well, Brueckner is a petty thief, burglar, drug dealer, rapist etc

Comparing hitler to hans wolters is an unbelievable statement lol, i can see where you are coming from why not do it again, but the amount of media attention. He also raped after 2007 so its possible he can be linked to several crimes. Extradited etc he is a career criminal. I think in a few weeks the hazel behan case of examining the thighs should be sorted soon.
Doesn't really compare much to a genocidal racist dictator who sent his country to war with the rest of world.

Wolters does come across as rather authoritarian however, his word is thus, is the only true word & you must accept without evidence that what he says is true, so I kind of get the point Brueckner was making, albeit in the extreme.

[jassi]

Until /or it gets to court no one will know what is right or wrong .

That will apply to much more than the alibi I think

[Wonderfulspam]

Until /or it gets to court no one will know what is right or wrong .

The presumption of innocence trumps any allegations.

So, it's one nil to Brueckner, unless Wolters can prove otherwise, & he's not having much luck with that.

[Wonderfulspam]

Comparing hitler to hans wolters is an unbelievable statement lol, i can see where you are coming from why not do it again, but the amount of media attention. He also raped after 2007 so its possible he can be linked to several crimes. Extradited etc he is a career criminal.

Wolters hasn't mentioned any though, certainly not any abductions & murders anyway.

Maybe he's saving them all up for later. Just get Hazel out of the way, then nail him for exposing himself on beaches & in playgrounds, then, somehow, as if by magic, through that process, Wolters will have accumulated sufficient evidence in relation to Maddie.

[Wonderfulspam]

You were proven wrong about The Alibi.

Was I?

That girl just couldn't remember if she'd ever met world famous abductor & murderer Brueckner before?

Sounds likely doesn't it.

[Wonderfulspam]

I haven't discounted the possibility that he is raving mad.

Raving mad, but also very efficient at traceless child abductions & murders, whilst filming them.

He is an interesting chap Brueckner, I'm looking forward to reading his book.

[Eleanor]

Was I?

That girl just couldn't remember if she'd ever met world famous abductor & murderer Brueckner before?

Sounds likely doesn't it.

She couldn't remember where he was that night.  There is a difference.

[Wonderfulspam]

She couldn't remember where he was that night.  There is a difference.

.....and no one can prove, or present any tangible evidence that Maddie was actually abducted that night, by Brueckner or anyone else, so, Brueckner wins by default.

[Mr Gray]

The presumption of innocence trumps any allegations.

So, it's one nil to Brueckner, unless Wolters can prove otherwise, & he's not having much luck with that.

The presumption of innocence does not trump any allegations

[Mr Gray]

.....and no one can prove, or present any tangible evidence that Maddie was actually abducted that night, by Brueckner or anyone else, so, Brueckner wins by default.

Wolters says he can prove Maddie was abducted and murdered...you can choose not to believe  him but you vsnt state as s fact he doesn't have proof