Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

[Wonderfulspam]

Best climb aboard the Tiger dear, Wolters has been telling us for two years the girl is dead soon after the alleged abduction by the hand of the prime suspect,  won't be long now.

Concrete evidence.
100% convinced.
Wolters simply cannot be wrong, can he.
Only, he is.

[G-Unit]

Talk about scraping the barrel - you're level of knowledge on the most trivial of details is really quite awesomely sad IMO.

Really? It might be that my level of knowledge allows me to have a fuller understanding than those who know less than me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Really? It might be that my level of knowledge allows me to have a fuller understanding than those who know less than me.

Yeah, right - you know better than the combined forces of the PJ, the Met and the BKA too I expect.  Such utter arrogance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

These 'silly little details' can be used to form a picture of what someone is like.

So what do these details tell you about Kate?  That she likes a biscuit with her tea which means she's probably guilty of covering up her child's death?

[G-Unit]

No they can't.  It's very subjective and full of confirmation bias and does not give a true picture of what someone is like

Any opinion of others is subjective, including yours.

[G-Unit]

Yeah, right - you know better than the combined forces of the PJ, the Met and the BKA too I expect.  Such utter arrogance.

I didn't say that, you did. Typical exaggeration. I think I know more than some people.

[Mr Gray]

These 'silly little details' can be used to form a picture of what someone is like.

So you accept you are wrong.... They can be used to form an opinion which may well be totally wrong.  None of us here know what the McCanns are like... We don't know them

[Vertigo Swirl]

I didn't say that, you did. Typical exaggeration. I think I know more than some people.

What do you think you know about this case that makes you a better judge of Kate and Gerry McCann than me for example?  Furthermore, I take that as a tacit admission that you don't know as much as the 3 police forces that are investigating an abduction - does that not tell you something?

[Mr Gray]

I didn't say that, you did. Typical exaggeration. I think I know more than some people.

Everything you and other sceptics know and think is flawed by your belief in the reliability of the cadaver dog.. Thats why imo your opinions are valueless

[Wonderfulspam]

What do you think you know about this case that makes you a better judge of Kate and Gerry McCann than me for example?  Furthermore, I take that as a tacit admission that you don't know as much as the 3 police forces that are investigating an abduction - does that not tell you something?

....and are at a total dead end.

You forgot to add that minor detail, that's where the vast weight of abduction evidence has led them after 15 years, that is, absolutely nowhere.

Why do you always forget that part?

[Mr Gray]

....and are at a total dead end.

You forgot to add that minor detail, that's where the vast weight of abduction evidence has led them after 15 years, that is, absolutely nowhere.

Why do you always forget that part?

Because they are not at a total dead end

[Mr Gray]

....and are at a total dead end.

You forgot to add that minor detail, that's where the vast weight of abduction evidence has led them after 15 years, that is, absolutely nowhere.

Why do you always forget that part?

When Wolters says CB is no longer prime suspect... That will be a fead end... But that hasn't happened

[Wonderfulspam]

Because they are not at a total dead end

Well, I suppose, if you've deluded yourself for the past 15 years with the nonsense idea that Maddie was definitely abducted, & that SY found evidence that proves as much, might just aswell imagine Brueckner is going to be charged some time in the future too, if you're desperate.

[Lace]

Concrete evidence.
100% convinced.
Wolters simply cannot be wrong, can he.
Only, he is.
[/quote

[Brietta]

What do you think you know about this case that makes you a better judge of Kate and Gerry McCann than me for example?  Furthermore, I take that as a tacit admission that you don't know as much as the 3 police forces that are investigating an abduction - does that not tell you something?

Having read much of the information available in the public domain I have come to certain conclusions.  Paramount amongst which is the fact that all three investigative authorities have stated categorically that they have no interest in Madeleine's parents.

The PJ - SY - BKA all have as their prime suspect, Brueckner.

Your continued obsession with Madeleine's parents is tremendously sad as far as you are concerned.  It is the attitude which led to so much information being overlooked in the past without meriting further investigation.

It would probably still have been the status quo had the Germans not taken a hand in Portuguese affairs when they did and as they continue to do.

That course of action must have upset your firmly held beliefs but don't you think you should lay off the McCanns at least until we find out what the ECHR has to say about their Presumption of Innocence and exactly what the evidence is that the BKA have on Brueckner.