Perceptions of Madeleine's Abduction

[Eleanor]

Did you all miss the bit where Amaral had Jane Tanner hiding in a blacked out van?  And him saying she said it was him when she didn't?

[G-Unit]

Ah right, so the Tapas group conspired to throw investigators off the scent that the McCanns dunnit,  by fingering Murat *checks calendar to see if it’s suddenly flipped back in time fifteen years*

Conspiracy is your interpretation, no-one else's. OG may have been tasked with finding an abductor, but they soon got rid of the sighting which was promoted as 'the abductor' for 10 years. This case has developed over time, and it's no use pretending that it's latest developments are unconnected to what went before. Imo some would prefer to forget the convoluted past, which, imo, still has many unanswered questions.

[G-Unit]

Did you all miss the bit where Amaral had Jane Tanner hiding in a blacked out van?  And him saying she said it was him when she didn't?

Or was that Bob Small? That was such a strange affair imo, and I wonder if it's only purpose was to see if JT would identify someone who didn't match the description of the man she saw. Where did it take place? Did they manage to get Murat to walk along the correct road in the correct direction? How? When last seen he was going home in his car.
Was Amaral there? Did Small think he was in Spain?

Amaral obviously knew about it, but there's no evidence he was involved.

[Eleanor]

Or was that Bob Small? That was such a strange affair imo, and I wonder if it's only purpose was to see if JT would identify someone who didn't match the description of the man she saw. Where did it take place? Did they manage to get Murat to walk along the correct road in the correct direction? How? When last seen he was going home in his car.
Was Amaral there? Did Small think he was in Spain?

Amaral obviously knew about it, but there's no evidence he was involved.

No.  Jane Tanner was afraid she was going to be abducted.  You have got all of it very mixed up.  But then you generally do.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Conspiracy is your interpretation, no-one else's. OG may have been tasked with finding an abductor, but they soon got rid of the sighting which was promoted as 'the abductor' for 10 years. This case has developed over time, and it's no use pretending that it's latest developments are unconnected to what went before. Imo some would prefer to forget the convoluted past, which, imo, still has many unanswered questions.

Do you understand what a conspiracy is, even?  What you have described perfectly fits the description, I suggest you refer to a dictionary..

[Vertigo Swirl]

What makes you think it was a conspiracy? That's about as likely as employees of the Ocean Club conspiring to hide where the Totman's apartment really was imo, by falsifying their records.

I don’t think there was a conspiracy- you clearly do.

[Eleanor]

I don’t think there was a conspiracy- you clearly do.

They never did find any of those in power who were lurking for the swinger's party.  I wonder what happened to them.

[barrier]

They never did find any of those in power who were lurking for the swinger's party.  I wonder what happened to them.

How many years did it take for Andrews failings to come out, not that I think any one of that bunch were involved,or any one else ,but 20 yrs or there abouts wasn't it.

[Eleanor]

How many years did it take for Andrews failings to come out, not that I think any one of that bunch were involved,or any one else ,but 20 yrs or there abouts wasn't it.

Is that Prince Andrew you are referring to?  Has he been convicted of anything?

[barrier]

Is that Prince Andrew you are referring to?  Has he been convicted of anything?

Did I say he had, but an out of court settlement cause he didn't do nowt wrong, like you do.

[G-Unit]

No.  Jane Tanner was afraid she was going to be abducted.  You have got all of it very mixed up.  But then you generally do.

By a UK policeman in cahoots with the Spanish police? Why get into a car and drive off with him then?

[Eleanor]

Did I say he had, but an out of court settlement cause he didn't do nowt wrong, like you do.

Jolly good show.  Innocent until proven guilty.

[G-Unit]

I don’t think there was a conspiracy- you clearly do.

No I don't, but no doubt you'll air your opinion as you so frequently do.

[barrier]

Jolly good show.  Innocent until proven guilty.

Money talks, doesn't help the next victim though.

[Vertigo Swirl]

No I don't, but no doubt you'll air your opinion as you so frequently do.

Your words:  “The PJ noticed Murat because of a British journalist, didn't they? They then had to investigate him, it had nothing to do with JT, unless she did identify him off the record. She, her husband and Fiona testified that he (and his mother) lied about his whereabouts that night too. It makes you wonder if some people were trying to stitch him up.”

Why would JT, her husband and Fiona, (or “some people” if you prefer) be trying to stitch up Murat?  That is you suggesting a conspiracy can you not see, how on earth are you able to deny it?