Anti facebook groups etc

[Rossb]

Best to remain as anonymous as possible on the internet- no pictures and no personal details.
Anyone who does otherwise is asking for trouble.
IMO

The other piece of advice I would give is not to get worked up about this case. It's not as if any input  will affect the outcome.

I agree but with it being a fb group i am the real person its just someone went through my fb which is real obvs and posted a photo of me in the comment section of a missing child, disgusting. Then i get blocked because i messaged jill havern asking her to do something about it and got ignored and blocked.

[Eleanor]

I agree but with it being a fb group i am the real person its just someone went through my fb which is real obvs and posted a photo of me in the comment section of a missing child, disgusting. Then i get blocked because i messaged jill havern asking her to do something about it and got ignored and blocked.

Anthony Bennett outed me due to my Email Address. But he picked on the wrong person if he thinks he intimidated me.

[jassi]

I see FB as a real danger to privacy. That's why I don't use it - ever.

[sadie]

I see FB as a real danger to privacy. That's why I don't use it - ever.

My privacy has gone.

I am reaping the results of that privately.   Pretty awful, the spite and revenge.  An inadequate person is doing it and I feel sorry for him.

I have never been a member of FB

[Brietta]

I see FB as a real danger to privacy. That's why I don't use it - ever.

I don't use FB myself as a rule but for those who do, I think it is a wonderful means of communication if used properly.

For example there are really interesting and informative groups particularly concerning local history and the history of surrounding towns etc - lost dogs and cats - general information

I think the problem arises because of deliberate corruption by corrupt people as has been outlined here and as can be seen by the number of innocuous groups which can only be accessed by becoming a member.


Interesting that you should bring up the issue of privacy.  Already referred to in this morning's posts is a  group which has actually gone out of its way to invade the privacy of others "CMOMM is the social media extension of the CMOMM forum".
Anyone remember the sick diplomas in McCann hatred? promoted by yet another well known facebooker and video editor who uses all means possible to keep the flames of hatred burning high and bright.

One certainly doesn't require a facebook account to become victim to privacy invasions ... they remain today as they always were and as they were created to be.  One of their most horrid attributes being the pretence and the aberration of cynically using Madeleine's name to put whatever obstacles they can muster to deny her the justice her family - BKA - SY - and now even the PJ seek for her.
In my opinion - all seriously sick!

[Eleanor]

My privacy has gone.

I am reaping the results of that privately.   Pretty awful, the spite and revenge.  An inadequate person is doing it and I feel sorry for him.

I have never been a member of FB

I thought I wasn't a member of FaceBook, but apparently I am.

I don't know how that happened.

[Brietta]

One post taken from random regarding Brueckner with reference to his Hitler comments ~

"It makes me wonder how long the cover-up will be maintained.

I can't help thinking that it's because of social media groups such as this one, who keep questioning the story of the McCanns and their pals about what really happened in PDL, that the UK government, police etc., feel they have to take the focus off the McCanns and maintain the charade.

If so, we're all doing a great job because at least it keeps the topic alive and not allows it to be forgotten and, more importantly, not allow what really happened to an innocent young child to be ever forgotten."

The question arises - is a mentality which allows a post such as that to be seriously made, more to be pitied than laughed at?

[sadie]

I don't use FB myself as a rule but for those who do, I think it is a wonderful means of communication if used properly.

For example there are really interesting and informative groups particularly concerning local history and the history of surrounding towns etc - lost dogs and cats - general information

I think the problem arises because of deliberate corruption by corrupt people as has been outlined here and as can be seen by the number of innocuous groups which can only be accessed by becoming a member.


Interesting that you should bring up the issue of privacy.  Already referred to in this morning's posts is a  group which has actually gone out of its way to invade the privacy of others "CMOMM is the social media extension of the CMOMM forum".
Anyone remember the sick diplomas in McCann hatred? promoted by yet another well known facebooker and video editor who uses all means possible to keep the flames of hatred burning high and bright.

One certainly doesn't require a facebook account to become victim to privacy invasions ... they remain today as they always were and as they were created to be.  One of their most horrid attributes being the pretence and the aberration of cynically using Madeleine's name to put whatever obstacles they can muster to deny her the justice her family - BKA - SY - and now even the PJ seek for her.
In my opinion - all seriously sick!

Exactly

He is very worried and the only consolation he can get is trying to take his evenge out on me.   Very sick.  I feel so sorry for him, but he caused his problems himself .

[Eleanor]

I thought I wasn't a member of FaceBook, but apparently I am.

I don't know how that happened.

I have to wonder if someone signed me up using my only Email Address.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Come back when you have evidence of a direct connection between The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann on facebook and webslueths.

PS I'm not your friend.

Gosh, flashback to Primary School there...

[Rossb]

Anthony Bennett outed me due to my Email Address. But he picked on the wrong person if he thinks he intimidated me.

You're words are mine, i feel the same, g unit seems to wamt forensic proof.

[G-Unit]

You're words are mine, i feel the same, g unit seems to wamt forensic proof.

There's plenty of people who'll believe whatever they're told. I'm not one of them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There's plenty of people who'll believe whatever they're told. I'm not one of them.

You do seem to think you’re rather special don’t you?

[G-Unit]

You do seem to think you’re rather special don’t you?

Because I don't take people at face value? That makes me sensible, imo, not special.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Because I don't take people at face value? That makes me sensible, imo, not special.

No, because IMO you see yourself as superior (ie more sensible) than people who you perceive “believe everything they are told”.  Who are these people, exactly and why does being suspicious of everything you are told make you more sensible?  If you are told for example that a disease could kill you and that getting a vaccine will lower that possibility do you immediately suspect it’s fake news and carry out your own scientific investigation?  Is that the sensible approach iyo?   Do you think people who view abduction as the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance are simply sheeple who’ll believe everything they are told?  Are you more sensible (ie superior) than me iyo?