Anti facebook groups etc

[Rossb]

Germany is the country that is claiming their prime suspect killed Madeleine without dna evidence , forensics or a body ,

Yeah but internally cpuntries do the same

[barrier]

Yeah but internally cpuntries do the same

  But we're not on about any other crimes in different countries,

[Vertigo Swirl]

Germany is the country that is claiming their prime suspect killed Madeleine without dna evidence , forensics or a body ,

Funnily enough Amaral claimed Madeleine died of a Calpol overdose and that the McCanns hid her body then  froze it and transported it in the hire car 23 days later, and that was also without the benefit of DNA evidence, forensics or a body and some people don't seem to have a problem with that at all. 

[Mr Gray]

Germany is the country that is claiming their prime suspect killed Madeleine without dna evidence , forensics or a body ,

Just s video of him doing it

[barrier]

Funnily enough Amaral claimed Madeleine died of a Calpol overdose and that the McCanns hid her body then  froze it and transported it in the hire car 23 days later, and that was also without the benefit of DNA evidence, forensics or a body and some people don't seem to have a problem with that at all.

Yet you do , but don't have an issue with the BKA declaring the same .

[Wonderfulspam]

Just s video of him doing it

Well, we can imagine there is, I suppose.

[barrier]

Just s video of him doing it

Wishful thinking .

[Rossb]

  But we're not on about any other crimes in different countries,

Oh right, sorry thought i was on a differemt thread! Point is all countries do the same, as in accusing parents and dont have to prove abduction, at least bka are trying tp give  a timeline.

[Wonderfulspam]

Wishful thinking .

No, Wolters said something which lead Davel to be certain of it.

So, it's all about believing Wolters really.

Just have faith in him, he'll deliver the goods eventually don't you worry, just not anytime in the foreseeable future though.

[barrier]

No, Wolters said something which lead Davel to be certain of it.

So, it's all about believing Wolters really.

Just have faith in him, he'll deliver the goods eventually don't you worry, just not anytime in the foreseeable future though.

Wolters said nothing of the sort though .

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh right, sorry thought i was on a differemt thread! Point is all countries do the same, as in accusing parents and dont have to prove abduction, at least bka are trying tp give  a timeline.

What timeline have they given ?

Someone recieved a call around 7:30pm til 8:00pm, then Brueckner murdered Maddie & destroyed the evidence.

That seems to be all they've given so far.

[Wonderfulspam]

Wolters said nothing of the sort though .

Ah but he did.

He made an appeal about 2 years ago asking for photos of the inside of houses Brueckner had been in.

He has thousands of abuse images he needs to match with the fireplace & wallpaper, so obviously the appeal was specifically regarding Maddie & no one else.

He doesn't seem to have made any appeals since though, so, maybe he's already matched the photo, but if so, it doesn't seem to have got him anywhere, since he can't see Brueckner being charged anytime at all.

[barrier]

What timeline have they given ?

Someone recieved a call around 7:30pm til 8:00pm, then Brueckner murdered Maddie & destroyed the evidence.

That seems to be all they've given so far.

Grange had better timelines with their suspects .

[Brietta]

Ah but he did.

He made an appeal about 2 years ago asking for photos of the inside of houses Brueckner had been in.

He has thousands of abuse images he needs to match with the fireplace & wallpaper, so obviously the appeal was specifically regarding Maddie & no one else.

He doesn't seem to have made any appeals since though, so, maybe he's already matched the photo, but if so, it doesn't seem to have got him anywhere, since he can't see Brueckner being charged anytime at all.

Again I think you may have hit the nail on the head despite posting nonsense worthy of whatever "Anti facebook groups etc" or whatever internet platform you may prefer.

If memory serves me well Brueckner's lawyer may well be working on a defence for two rapes on two unknown women, one an older woman and one much younger.
It seems the BKA may have used the system of gathering the evidence for these vile offenses using exactly the methods you hold up to ridicule.

[Brietta]

Grange had better timelines with their suspects .

Are you referring to the burglars interviewed in 2014?

Just as in Brueckner's case the PJ studiously ignored the phone ping evidence available to them in 2007.