The Remit of SY

[Wonderfulspam]

Words fail me on occasions.  But it's not my problem anyway.  Tis yours and yours and yours.

What problem?

[Eleanor]

What problem?

Do try not to be any more stupid than you actually are.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course Eleanor & the rest are only here to help find Maddie.
Sniping is utterly beneath them all.
When are supporters organising the next search for Maddie? Sitting behind a keyboard virtue signalling hasn't solved anything so far.

[Wonderfulspam]

Do try not to be any more stupid than you actually are.

Reported to moderator. Personal insults.

[faithlilly]

Reported to moderator. Personal insults.

And the moderator is…ah yes Eleanor! Good luck with that.

[Eleanor]

And the moderator is…ah yes Eleanor! Good luck with that.

Oh Dear.  You really don't understand how this Forum works.

John reads every Report along with three other Moderators.

[G-Unit]

The Review.  Not The Investigation.  More codswallop being used to deflect.  I worry sometimes about the misuse of The English Language.

If I was the worrying type, I would worry about the lack of comprehension of the English language;

ordinarily a review has no investigative remit whatsoever- the scale and extent of this enquiry cannot permit for such an approach. It will take too long to progress to any “action stage” if activity is given wholly and solely to a review process.

The ‘investigative review’ will be conducted with transparency, openness and thoroughness.

[Eleanor]

If I was the worrying type, I would worry about the lack of comprehension of the English language;

ordinarily a review has no investigative remit whatsoever- the scale and extent of this enquiry cannot permit for such an approach. It will take too long to progress to any “action stage” if activity is given wholly and solely to a review process.

The ‘investigative review’ will be conducted with transparency, openness and thoroughness.

Perhaps you should read your link in full.

[Brietta]

The Review.  Not The Investigation.  More codswallop being used to deflect.  I worry sometimes about the misuse of The English Language.

I think the main problem is sceptic inability to see the wood for the giant redwood trees obscuring vision and independent analysis.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think the main problem is sceptic inability to see the wood for the giant redwood trees obscuring vision and independent analysis.

What conspiracy theorists do is fixate on tiny weeny molehills and make veritable Everests out of them, in this instance the molehill is the word “abduction”, and we have watched them moulding it into a mountain ever since the remit was published.  Let them keep climbing, they’ll fall off one day.

[Brietta]

If I was the worrying type, I would worry about the lack of comprehension of the English language;

ordinarily a review has no investigative remit whatsoever- the scale and extent of this enquiry cannot permit for such an approach. It will take too long to progress to any “action stage” if activity is given wholly and solely to a review process.

The ‘investigative review’ will be conducted with transparency, openness and thoroughness.

There seems to be an expectation dominant in all you post that nothing should ever have changed in the initial three pronged approach to analysing investigative materials from the past in the hope of progressing Madeleine McCann's case. 
Signifying a very real resistance to change and thus failing to understand what Operation Grange or any other cold case review is designed to accomplish.

The most compelling outcome in Madeleine's investigation to date is the huge change brought about by advancements in knowledge led by new information and evidence which added German input to the mix.

I would say that the Operation Grange remit of attempting to discover what happened to Madeleine has been amazingly worked.
As yet we have no definitive answer as to her fate but for the first time since 2007 there is a named prime suspect in the frame which is testament to the changing climate which has been brought about by the diligence of Operation Grange personnel.

That is what it is all about.  Progress and change; words which appear to be anathema to sceptics who by their nature are condemned to be stuck like flies in the aspic of their limitations and prejudices.

[Brietta]

What conspiracy theorists do is fixate on tiny weeny molehills and make veritable Everests out of them, in this instance the molehill is the word “abduction”, and we have watched them moulding it into a mountain ever since the remit was published.  Let them keep climbing, they’ll fall off one day.

I think they have fallen off already, they are just trying to comfort themselves that they haven't.

[Wonderfulspam]

There seems to be an expectation dominant in all you post that nothing should ever have changed in the initial three pronged approach to analysing investigative materials from the past in the hope of progressing Madeleine McCann's case. 
Signifying a very real resistance to change and thus failing to understand what Operation Grange or any other cold case review is designed to accomplish.

The most compelling outcome in Madeleine's investigation to date is the huge change brought about by advancements in knowledge led by new information and evidence which added German input to the mix.

I would say that the Operation Grange remit of attempting to discover what happened to Madeleine has been amazingly worked.
As yet we have no definitive answer as to her fate but for the first time since 2007 there is a named prime suspect in the frame which is testament to the changing climate which has been brought about by the diligence of Operation Grange personnel.

That is what it is all about.  Progress and change; words which appear to be anathema to sceptics who by their nature are condemned to be stuck like flies in the aspic of their limitations and prejudices.

What a load of old hogwash. Brueckner being a suspect has sod all to do with the dilligence of Grange & everything to do with one crook grassing up another with some flimsy confession 'evidence'. Which is why Brueckner won't be charged with anything relating to Maddie any time ever.

[faithlilly]

Oh Dear.  You really don't understand how this Forum works.

John reads every Report along with three other Moderators.

But of course.

[faithlilly]

There seems to be an expectation dominant in all you post that nothing should ever have changed in the initial three pronged approach to analysing investigative materials from the past in the hope of progressing Madeleine McCann's case. 
Signifying a very real resistance to change and thus failing to understand what Operation Grange or any other cold case review is designed to accomplish.

The most compelling outcome in Madeleine's investigation to date is the huge change brought about by advancements in knowledge led by new information and evidence which added German input to the mix.

I would say that the Operation Grange remit of attempting to discover what happened to Madeleine has been amazingly worked.
As yet we have no definitive answer as to her fate but for the first time since 2007 there is a named prime suspect in the frame which is testament to the changing climate which has been brought about by the diligence of Operation Grange personnel.

That is what it is all about.  Progress and change; words which appear to be anathema to sceptics who by their nature are condemned to be stuck like flies in the aspic of their limitations and prejudices.

Charges and trial are better words….both of which, in relation to Madeleine, we won’t be hearing anytime soon I’d wager.