The Remit of SY

[Eleanor]

If this forum is only being kept alive by a WUM and his tiny (brained) fan club then it's probably for the best if it was put out of its misery imo .

You could say that.  But I'm not allowed to.

[barrier]

It’s also a platform to debate.

Sadly that ship sailed long ago, too many personal attacks now.

[faithlilly]

Sadly that ship sailed long ago, too many personal attacks now.

The constant attacks on G especially by her fellow moderators have been particularly egregious. Time for it to stop.

[Brietta]

Members are requested to stick to the thread topic; if that is exhausted please start another thread or revert to an existing thread.

For example, there is already a thread to address all questions or statements regarding moderation.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The constant attacks on G especially by her fellow moderators have been particularly egregious. Time for it to stop.

Constant attacks?!  If repeated requests for a cite that she refuses to even acknowledge constitutes an  attack then I fear you are probably both best off sticking to a forum where you can spout any old nonsense in comfort and without fear of being asked to justify it,  and where everyone reinforces your beliefs and strokes your fragile egos.

[G-Unit]

The constant attacks on G especially by her fellow moderators have been particularly egregious. Time for it to stop.

Probably the only way they can attempt to answer my posts. Trying to explain and justify how Operation Grange's remit named the crime before examining the evidence is, after all, pretty much impossible.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Probably the only way they can attempt to answer my posts. Trying to explain and justify how Operation Grange's remit named the crime before examining the evidence is, after all, pretty much impossible.

That's not a cite for your claim that the review and reinvestigation were running concurrently right from the start - do you have one please?  I'm not asking for much really - but if you can't then  simply post a    emoji and I'll not mention it again. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Could we see some examples of these "particularly egregious" attacks on G-Unit?
Egregious definition: "outstandingly bad, shocking"
So - particularly outstandingly bad and shocking attacks is what we're looking for. 
Sounds horrendous.  I'm amazed the police haven't been called.

[G-Unit]

That's not a cite for your claim that the review and reinvestigation were running concurrently right from the start - do you have one please?  I'm not asking for much really - but if you can't then  simply post a    emoji and I'll not mention it again.

Read the remit.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Read the remit.

I've read it.  Where does it say the re-investigation began at the same time as the review? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

G-Unit, perhaps you can explain this?
https://www.met.police.uk/notices/met/operation-grange/#:~:text=In%20July%202013%20the%20status,continues%20to%20fund%20Operation%20Grange.

"In July 2013 the status of the Met’s enquiries changed to that of an investigation, working with the Portuguese authorities to pursue specific lines of enquiry".

How could the Review change to that of an investigation if as you claim it started as an investigation?

[barrier]

Constant attacks?!  If repeated requests for a cite that she refuses to even acknowledge constitutes an  attack then I fear you are probably both best off sticking to a forum where you can spout any old nonsense in comfort and without fear of being asked to justify it,  and where everyone reinforces your beliefs and strokes your fragile egos.

Therein lies the reasons behind the constant sniping ,Myths is not high profile enough, so get the [ censored word] off of here and bingo.

[faithlilly]

Probably the only way they can attempt to answer my posts. Trying to explain and justify how Operation Grange's remit named the crime before examining the evidence is, after all, pretty much impossible.

Indeed. It appears I’m being censored for posting against the concentrated effort of some to disrupt the debate.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Indeed. It appears I’m being censored for posting against the concentrated effort of some to disrupt the debate.

Get off your high horse.  The only person here attempting to debate and post on topic at the moment  is me and I am largely being ignored.  I wonder why....? 

[G-Unit]

I've read it.  Where does it say the re-investigation began at the same time as the review?

It was an investigative review and whatever it was doing the crime was abduction..