The Remit of SY

[Vertigo Swirl]

And I thought Gunit was looking for evidence that The McCanns done it.

Am I wrong about that?

Lord, she’s “only asking questions”, but why she’s asking them of us is anyone’s guess when she mostly ignores the answers.

[G-Unit]

Lord, she’s “only asking questions”, but why she’s asking them of us is anyone’s guess when she mostly ignores the answers.

Often the answers are unrelated to the questions.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Often the answers are unrelated to the questions.

Rubbish.  Often the answers are not what you want hear.  And - you only ask questions you either already know the answer to or know that no one here can answer.  Why bother?

[sadie]

Rubbish.  Often the answers are not what you want hear.  And - you only ask questions you either already know the answer to or know that no one here can answer.  Why bother?

It's all about casting doubt on The Mccanns, VS.   Nowt else.   Disinformation that if repeated often enough becomes 'fact'

Just viscious undermining to try and destroy The Mccanns IMO

A psychological ploy to get 'Public Opinion' on their side



But why?   That's what interests me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's all about casting doubt on The Mccanns, VS.   Nowt else.   Disinformation that if repeated often enough becomes 'fact'

Just viscious undermining to try and destroy The Mccanns IMO

A psychological ploy to get 'Public Opinion' on their side



But why?   That's what interests me.

whatever the reason, it’s utterly pointless and a complete waste of time.

[sadie]

whatever the reason, it’s utterly pointless and a complete waste of time.

Furthermore it is cruel and obnoxious.   The sign of unpleasant people IMO, or else there is a sinister purpose, to alter the public perception in case of the Law dealing with it.   To get Public Opinion against The Mccanns and Madeleine.

Dunno which, but I can have a good guess that with some it is both.

All in my opinion , but it is crazy otherwise.

[G-Unit]

Furthermore it is cruel and obnoxious.   The sign of unpleasant people IMO, or else there is a sinister purpose, to alter the public perception in case of the Law dealing with it.   To get Public Opinion against The Mccanns and Madeleine.

Dunno which, but I can have a good guess that with some it is both.

All in my opinion , but it is crazy otherwise.

Some people are convinced that Madeleine McCann was abducted by a stranger, but others aren't.  Those who believe the McCanns can't prove they're right and I've seen no proof offerred by Operation Grange either. Repeating the same mantra over and over again doesn't make it true.

Opinions can be expressed without any intention to cause harm to anyone.

[Angelo222]

Some people are convinced that Madeleine McCann was abducted by a stranger, but others aren't.  Those who believe the McCanns can't prove they're right and I've seen no proof offerred by Operation Grange either. Repeating the same mantra over and over again doesn't make it true.

Opinions can be expressed without any intention to cause harm to anyone.

I still don't buy the abduction claim. As far as I am concerned she walked out of that unlocked unsecured apartment and was run over. Whoever ran her over probably panicked and carried her off. All in my honest opinion.

[G-Unit]

I still don't buy the abduction claim. As far as I am concerned she walked out of that unlocked unsecured apartment and was run over. Whoever ran her over probably panicked and carried her off. All in my honest opinion.

I think any opinions deserve to be heard without the holders of those opinions being accused of having ulterior motives. There's no evidence that Madeleine didn't leave 5A via the patio doors, just opinion.

[barrier]

I still don't buy the abduction claim. As far as I am concerned she walked out of that unlocked unsecured apartment and was run over. Whoever ran her over probably panicked and carried her off. All in my honest opinion.

There's no DNA, no evidence of an abduction, no one says they saw a stranger enter or leave 5a.

[Vertigo Swirl]

And yet when some of us express an opinion that Madeleine was likely abducted and possibly by Bruckner or someone like him we are trolled mercilessly by the resident WUM and accused of being morally degenerate by the High Horse Brigade and all you who have commented today don’t appear to have a problem with that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think any opinions deserve to be heard without the holders of those opinions being accused of having ulterior motives. There's no evidence that Madeleine didn't leave 5A via the patio doors, just opinion.

Give us an example of evidence you would expect to find that she didn’t leave via the patio doors

[Vertigo Swirl]

I still don't buy the abduction claim. As far as I am concerned she walked out of that unlocked unsecured apartment and was run over. Whoever ran her over probably panicked and carried her off. All in my honest opinion.

It’s odd that not a single investigator ex police or otherwise has come to the same conclusion as you.  I wonder why not…?

[barrier]

It’s odd that not a single investigator ex police or otherwise has come to the same conclusion as you.  I wonder why not…?

MWT thinks she left 5a under her own steam.

[barrier]

And yet when some of us express an opinion that Madeleine was likely abducted and possibly by Bruckner or someone like him we are trolled mercilessly by the resident WUM and accused of being morally degenerate by the High Horse Brigade and all you who have commented today don’t appear to have a problem with that.

Window, patio doors, or front door, what time ?