The Remit of SY

[Eleanor]

A lot of good people were initially taken in.  And who could blame them.  The organisation of the propaganda was unprecedented.

But why?  Why would anyone get a kick out of doing this by telling Lies?  I simply don't understand it.  Is our society so fractured as to enjoy doing this?

Well, I'll tell you what.  Not in my World.

[Vertigo Swirl]

A lot of good people were initially taken in.  And who could blame them.  The organisation of the propaganda was unprecedented.

The brighter ones cottoned on to this eventually, sadly most others who were taken in either aren’t that bright or aren’t that bothered about what actually happened so long as nothing gets in their way of giving the McCanns a good kicking on a regular basis.

[Wonderfulspam]

The brighter ones cottoned on to this eventually, sadly most others who were taken in either aren’t that bright or aren’t that bothered about what actually happened so long as nothing gets in their way of giving the McCanns a good kicking on a regular basis.

Well we know what happened now don't we.
Maddie was murdered by Brueckner & Wolters is going to prove it. Just not anytime in the foreseeable future though.

[G-Unit]

The brighter ones cottoned on to this eventually, sadly most others who were taken in either aren’t that bright or aren’t that bothered about what actually happened so long as nothing gets in their way of giving the McCanns a good kicking on a regular basis.

Discussing OG's remit equals 'giving the McCanns a good kicking"? Metaphorically speaking I assume. Imo it's time to change the record.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Discussing OG's remit equals 'giving the McCanns a good kicking"? Metaphorically speaking I assume. Imo it's time to change the record.

As I didn’t say that I think perhaps it is you who should change the record and stop twisting what I have said.   Discussing the remit is fine.  Using the remit as evidence that the McCanns were protected by the High Ups is just conspiracy nonsense but even that does not equate to giving the McCanns a good kicking per se.  Mine was a general observation.  The McCanns are still the subjects of alot if online hate, misinformation and unpleasantness and it is the purveyors of that kind of nasty crap that I was referring to.  Some of it happens here, mostly it happens elsewhere.   Hope that’s clear now.

[G-Unit]

As I didn’t say that I think perhaps it is you who should change the record and stop twisting what I have said.   Discussing the remit is fine.  Using the remit as evidence that the McCanns were protected by the High Ups is just conspiracy nonsense but even that does not equate to giving the McCanns a good kicking per se.  Mine was a general observation.  The McCanns are still the subjects of alot if online hate, misinformation and unpleasantness and it is the purveyors of that kind of nasty crap that I was referring to.  Some of it happens here, mostly it happens elsewhere.   Hope that’s clear now.

I think some people are fixated on seeing everything that's said on the forum as being motivated by dislike of the McCanns. It gets very boring.

OG's remit suggests no conspiracy to protect the McCanns imo, merely a willingness to name the crime before investigating it. If the UK authorities had evidence definately eliminating those who were connected with Madeleine it's a pity they have chosen to keep it secret for all these years.

[Brietta]

Discussing OG's remit equals 'giving the McCanns a good kicking"? Metaphorically speaking I assume. Imo it's time to change the record.

You really must refrain from putting words into members' mouths.  It is intrinsically dishonest.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think some people are fixated on seeing everything that's said on the forum as being motivated by dislike of the McCanns. It gets very boring.

OG's remit suggests no conspiracy to protect the McCanns imo, merely a willingness to name the crime before investigating it. If the UK authorities had evidence definately eliminating those who were connected with Madeleine it's a pity they have chosen to keep it secret for all these years.

Are you referring to me as "some people"?  Presumably, as you are answering my post.  I have not said that everything that is said on this forum is motivated by a dislike of the McCanns.  Obviously a lot of it is, including every single post by the resident troll(s), by at least one member of the Admin team, and others I shan't name.   You may be bored of hearing about it, but frankly I'm bored of hearing you banging on about the remit (how long ago was that written and you're STILL harping on about it!), and discrepancies in the McCanns and friends statements - yawn, the McCanns haven't been suspects since 2008, their friends have NEVER been suspects and yet here you still are trying to raise suspicions about them.  The phrase "get a life" springs to mind.

This is an ongoing investigation and the Met are under no obligation to you to share anything with you so I suggest you learn to accept that there are some things that are none of your actual business.

[Eleanor]

I think some people are fixated on seeing everything that's said on the forum as being motivated by dislike of the McCanns. It gets very boring.

OG's remit suggests no conspiracy to protect the McCanns imo, merely a willingness to name the crime before investigating it. If the UK authorities had evidence definately eliminating those who were connected with Madeleine it's a pity they have chosen to keep it secret for all these years.

What?  No one has to eliminate The McCanns.  This is not the way in which Justice works. You might as well try to eliminate every other person in Praia de Luz that night.

This is a totally insane idea, as ever.

[G-Unit]

What?  No one has to eliminate The McCanns.  This is not the way in which Justice works. You might as well try to eliminate every other person in Praia de Luz that night.

This is a totally insane idea, as ever.

Only those with means, motive and opportunity need to be investigated and eliminated.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only those with means, motive and opportunity need to be investigated and eliminated.

The whole of PdL on the night in question then.

[G-Unit]

The whole of PdL on the night in question then.

So if a child disappears from a town the whole town needs to be eliminated?

[Wonderfulspam]

So if a child disappears from a town the whole town needs to be eliminated?

Yes, everyone except the child's parents.

[sadie]

Only those with means, motive and opportunity need to be investigated and eliminated.

You ae leaving out persons who have unknown motive.   Whose motive is not known.  There are plenty of them.

So they are to remain uninvestigated?


You are leaving out those who don't need any opportunity because they pay, bribe or blackmail others to do the actual dirty work.   They, in the meantime, are sweet talking all around them.   Goes on everywhere these days and notably o this forum by an odd person or more

[Vertigo Swirl]

So if a child disappears from a town the whole town needs to be eliminated?

You tell me.  No one has been cleared right?  So Pamela Fenn’s niece, the Tapas Waiter, the nannies, Murat, Tasmin Sillence or her lying, money grabbing dad, any one of them could have done it.  They’ve not been eliminated  so they are all fair game to be speculated about, ad infinitum till either they or we are kicking up the daisies, isn’t that right?  Oh wait, we can eliminate CB on the basis that he probably lent his phone to a friend that night, has never abducted or murdered before and just doesn’t seem the type.  But apart from him, no one else can be eliminated.

Why don’t you tell us what evidence could possibly exist that would eliminate the McCanns?  Go on, put on your thinking cap and come up with. an example of something, anything that you would accept that eliminated them to your satisfaction.