The Evidence Madeleine Was Taken In A Criminal Act By A Stranger.

[barrier]

Its a simple enough question, what convinces you that would pass the BARD threshold that Madeleine was taken out of 5a by a stranger.

[Wonderfulspam]

The three pronged international investigation, that aren't sharing evidence, can't agree & aren't entirely sure, armed as they are with all the abduction & murder evidence they have at their disposal, they can't quite agree on whether the murderer really did murder Maddie, or if she was even murdered at all. Going well isn't it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Its a simple enough question, what convinces you that would pass the BARD threshold that Madeleine was taken out of 5a by a stranger.

Yes, what possible evidence, that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger, could the police have?

We have an alleged confession to murder to add to the list at least.

1) The McCanns claim Madeleine was abducted

2) An allegedly open window, that had Kate's prints on it

3) A second hand confession by a local burgling, rapist & paedophile, to Madeleine's murder.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you believe that the police always tell the truth to the public?

No, do you believe they always lie?

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes, what possible evidence, that Madeleine was taken in a criminal act by a stranger, could the police have?

We have an alleged confession to murder to add to the list at least.

1) The McCanns claim Madeleine was abducted

2) An allegedly open window, that had Kate's prints on it

3) A second hand confession by a local burgling, rapist & paedophile, to Madeleine's murder.

On second thoughts, I have to scrap number 3. The alleged confession wasn't reported to police until 2017, but SY had already established there was a criminal act by a stranger before then.
So we're back to just the first two.

[Wonderfulspam]

No evidence any one has.

Ahh, but if you knew the evidence Wolters has, you would be in no doubt.

[kizzy]

They didn't settle for a 'possible' explanation they settled for abduction.

Yes, with no evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes, with no evidence.

That's not entirely true. The McCanns did say that Madeleine was abducted. That's their evidence. It's yet to be tested in court. But given there's a new prime suspect & concrete evidence Madeleine died at his hand, well, it shouldn't be much longer now.

[kizzy]

Who stages an abduction by opening a window and leaving their fingerprints on it?

Why did she leave it wide open then with twins inside run to the tapas and then close it when she got back.

It was evidence after all...if there had been prints of the so-called abductor she would have wiped them off.

Same as why she let 20-plus people in to trample any evidence there could have been in there.

[Eleanor]

An iincredibly ludicrous thread at a time when there is an at least three pronged international police investigation currently taking place into a 2007 resident of Luz who fits a perfect profile (cept he's not dead -according to Amaral).

I no longer really care.  There is nothing to indicte The Mccains and I don't have to worry about this,  beyond worrying about the mental state of those who wish to do so.

There is something really horrible going on which is mostly to do with their own inadequiecese, which is really sad. Especially since there is nothing that I can do about this.

[barrier]

I no longer really care.  There is nothing to indicte The Mccains and I don't have to worry about this,  beyond worrying about the mental state of those who wish to do so.

There is something really horrible going on which is mostly to do with their own inadequiecese, which is really sad. Especially since there is nothing that I can do about this.

Who appointed you as arbiter of alleged inadequacies .

[Lace]

Why did she leave it wide open then with twins inside run to the tapas and then close it when she got back.

It was evidence after all...if there had been prints of the so-called abductor she would have wiped them off.

Same as why she let 20-plus people in to trample any evidence there could have been in there.

Can you imagine finding your daughter missing?   Have you ever tried to put yourself in the place of Kate a mother who couldn't find her daughter?

You talk as though she should have acted as if she was a Police woman 'better not touch the window because of finger prints'  'better shut the window'  'don't go into the apartment its all evidence'.    Kate wouldn't have been thinking any of this her main course of action was to search for her child.

It's great to look at it with no compassion  isn't it,   knowing what happened next.

[Lace]

Guess not. Nothing to add to the discussion, other than to insult other members. What a fine example you set as a senior moderator.

You were goading.

[Lace]

Yes, with no evidence.

What evidence have you got that she wasn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

Can you imagine finding your daughter missing?   Have you ever tried to put yourself in the place of Kate a mother who couldn't find her daughter?

You talk as though she should have acted as if she was a Police woman 'better not touch the window because of finger prints'  'better shut the window'  'don't go into the apartment its all evidence'.    Kate wouldn't have been thinking any of this her main course of action was to search for her child.

It's great to look at it with no compassion  isn't it,   knowing what happened next.

Did she check the wardrobe?