Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 477986 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Read the first and second statements. I believe Tanner did see the man but I don't believe she passed Gerry and Jez as she claimed.
When did she see him then?

Offline pathfinder73

When did she see him then?

I would have to question crecheman first.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
I would have to question crecheman first.
Do you not think SY did that?  Do you not think that they were able to be "almost certain" it was him who JT saw, based on the time he said he passed Apt 5a?  Or do you think SY didn't really bother to ask him such a question?

Offline pathfinder73

Do you not think SY did that?  Do you not think that they were able to be "almost certain" it was him who JT saw, based on the time he said he passed Apt 5a?  Or do you think SY didn't really bother to ask him such a question?

Yes SY will know a lot more. I think she saw him at 9:12.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Yes SY will know a lot more. I think she saw him at 9:12.
So - she saw a man, carrying a child which she believed at the time may have been the abductor, but she .... about seeing Gerry and Jez talking together (which they WERE around that time) because...?
« Last Edit: May 26, 2014, 10:22:45 PM by Admin »

Offline John

Do you not think SY did that?  Do you not think that they were able to be "almost certain" it was him who JT saw, based on the time he said he passed Apt 5a?  Or do you think SY didn't really bother to ask him such a question?

Thing is he didn't know the exact time he passed the car park at the front of Block 5.  SY is taking 2 and 2 and assuming a 4 whereas we know it could very well be a 22.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2014, 02:11:03 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Thing is he didn't know the exact time he passed the car park at the front of Block 5.  SY is taking 2 and 2 and assuming a 4 whereas we know it could very well be a 22.
That's right WE don't know what time he passed the car park, SY however have interviewed the man and are therefore better placed to know than we are what time he is likely to have passed by.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
I don't believe she passed them where she claimed. If she walked passed them then I question whether they were present at that time and somebody was elsewhere.
Sorry, that makes no sense to me.

Offline pathfinder73

Sorry, that makes no sense to me.

What makes no sense to me is how she walked past them without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street. If they did a reconstruction everyone would know that it was not possible.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline jassi

What makes no sense to me is how she walked past them without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street. If they did a reconstruction everyone would know that it was not possible.

Which might be why a reconstruction has never been done.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
What makes no sense to me is how she walked past them without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street. If they did a reconstruction everyone would know that it was not possible.
You believe JT saw Crecheman at 9.12pm.  How does this contradict Jez's statement of where he was and what he was doing at around this time?

Offline Mr Moderator

What makes no sense to me is how she walked past them without being seen or heard on a quiet deserted street. If they did a reconstruction everyone would know that it was not possible.

Don't  you realise Gerry knows this?  Why do you think he insists the chat took place on the opposite side of the street and at a spot where there is little light?

Offline pathfinder73

Don't  you realise Gerry knows this?  Why do you think he insists the chat took place on the opposite side of the street and at a spot where there is little light?

Yes Gerry knows it and also if Tannerman is now in 5A (the reason for the moving door) he's put himself a good distance away from the crime that is happening inside.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2014, 03:03:09 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Jes Wilkins, from his statement:

Relative to the sighting in Dr. Francisco Gentil street;

From the location where we met for our conversation, it is possible to see the top of the hill. I cannot confirm if I was always turned in this direction. It is definitely possible that someone could have crossed holding a child without my noticing.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
So - Jes doesn't think it's impossible, Gerry doesn't think it's impossible, Jane doesn't think it's impossible, Scotland Yard doesn't think it's impossible - only doubters think it's impossible.