Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 443680 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
In a quiet, dark street in a foreign country, yes unless completely p***ed.

Why do you notice everyone who walks past you 'in a quiet dark street in a foreign country'?  Is it because you are fearful of the natives? 

Offline slartibartfast

Why do you notice everyone who walks past you 'in a quiet dark street in a foreign country'?  Is it because you are fearful of the natives?

It's called keeping safe.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline jassi

Why do you notice everyone who walks past you 'in a quiet dark street in a foreign country'?  Is it because you are fearful of the natives?

I would think you would take notice of others, wherever you might be.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline faithlilly

Why should Jez notice her?   He didn't even know her ... and from somewhere I read that she was cold and wearing Russells fleece ...  so hardly the sort of image a man would notice.

Why should it register that a passerby walked by?


If you are chatting, do you notice everyone walking past.  I dont

Jez knew she was one of the tapas group and had recognised her earlier in the evening. The quote was posted on this thread a few days back sadie but I can post it again if you like.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline peter claridge

Why should Jez notice her?   He didn't even know her ... and from somewhere I read that she was cold and wearing Russells fleece ...  so hardly the sort of image a man would notice.

Why should it register that a passerby walked by?


If you are chatting, do you notice everyone walking past.  I dont

Just how did Jane notice that abductor and in so much detail as well?






stephen25000

  • Guest
Just how did Jane notice that abductor and in so much detail as well?

X-ray vision ? 8)--))

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
I would think you would take notice of others, wherever you might be.
Would you?  You can recall who passed you by on the street in the last couple of days can you?

Offline faithlilly

Would you?  You can recall who passed you by on the street in the last couple of days can you?

Certainly if you knew the person. Jez knew who Jane was and if she had passed I'm sure Jez would remember as he would have more than likely been struck by her non-acknowledgement of Gerry, one of her friends.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Certainly if you knew the person. Jez knew who Jane was and if she had passed I'm sure Jez would remember as he would have more than likely been struck by her non-acknowledgement of Gerry, one of her friends.
Why would he necessarily remember if he never even noticed her in the first place?  If he had been stood there alone waiting for someone to turn up then I might be more inclined to agree, but his attention was elsewhere, chatting to Gerry and with his baby in a push chair, not to mention it was quite dark. I don't suppose for one minute you will accept this as an explanation but perhaps you could explain why not?

Offline pathfinder73

Did you miss these reconstruction shots? "I can affirm that it was a quiet street and it was very unlikely that someone could have passed by me in this way." (JW)



« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 11:12:52 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Benice

Why would he necessarily remember if he never even noticed her in the first place?  If he had been stood there alone waiting for someone to turn up then I might be more inclined to agree, but his attention was elsewhere, chatting to Gerry and with his baby in a push chair, not to mention it was quite dark. I don't suppose for one minute you will accept this as an explanation but perhaps you could explain why not?

IMO Some people just want to believe she lied.    Although a credible reason as to why a mother of two small children of her own would decide to perjure herself and be guilty of perverting the course of justice -  thus risking a prison sentence in a Portuguese jail, for someone she hardly knew,  is never forthcoming.


The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline pathfinder73

I believe she saw crècheman but did she pass Jez? Not according to him she didn't.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Benice

I believe she saw crècheman but did she pass Jez? Not according to him she didn't.

''Very unlikely'' does not mean 'impossible' - just as 'rare' does not mean 'never'.

It makes no sense for JT to lie.  Why would she?  Would you?





The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline pathfinder73

''Very unlikely'' does not mean 'impossible' - just as 'rare' does not mean 'never'.

It makes no sense for JT to lie.  Why would she?  Would you?


To possibly give somebody an alibi. After realising how unlikely this was to be believed it was changed to the other side of the road.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 12:46:29 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Benice

To give somebody an alibi.

In that case surely Gerry would have said he saw her?  Otherwise what was the point?

And that still  doesn't explain why she would agree to give him an alibi which involved her lying to the Portuguese police and risking a prison sentence in a foreign country - possibly separated for years from her own children.      Can you explain why she would even dream of taking that risk?   Can you explain what she had  to gain by criminally perjuring herself to the PJ  that was preferable to her simply telling the truth?
 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal