Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 443706 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1170 on: February 06, 2015, 12:36:22 AM »
The PJ discredits Jane Tanner's testimony. They say that when she saw said man with the child, you [Gerry] were chatting nearby and it was impossible that you hadn't seen him as well…

So that's what it was all about, was it?  Amaral trying to prove his wonky theory.  He had to have Gerry and Jez as close to Tannerman as possible in order that he could claim that it was impossible for Gerry not to have seen Tannerman

For starters, the spot above the gate to 5A, where Amaral has falsely placed Gerry and Jez is still  22.7 metres away [75 feet - measure it yourself on GEarth if you dont believe me] from Tannerman.  And the road was poorly lit.   Sure, if you are a doting Amaral fan you will believe the garbage that Gerry would have seen Tannerman at that distance in a dimly lit road.  Get real PFinder, purleaze

Additionally Tannerman was to Gerrys north and Gerry was facing East.  At an angle of virtually 90^ to the direction that Gerry was looking.  Periferal images finish at about 40^ IIRC [From Heribertos information].    Tannerman was way beyond Gerrys line of vision and way beyond Jezes line of vision also.

Amaral should know these things as a senior cop.  Why was he so desperate to undermine Janes sighting?
Could it be that at that stage, he was keen to convict the Mccanns and had to try and convince people that Tannerman was a figment of Janes imagination ? .... or worse that she was "in league with them?
 

(Gerry says he didn't see because his back was turned while he was chatting with a friend.)

I think you are muddled here PFinder.  This was referring to Gerrys position relative to Jane as she passed by surely?   Nothing to do with Tannerman at all ?
 


Jane Tanner's testimony has evolved in an inverse manner to human mentality. Initially, she had seen only a person at a distance. As time went by, she started remembering details in such a manner that at the end, she even remembered the texture of the clothing that the man and the little girl were wearing.

I think that when distances are mentioned they are 5 - 10 metres.  Remember both Jane and Tannerman were walking so the distances relative to each other would change as they moved.

All the initial statements were VERY short IIRC.   As time went on all the later statements were lengthened dramataically and she gave more detailed descriptions.   There was talk that she received hypnosis to improve her memory.  I have no idea whether this is true or not.

 
That was how she pointed at Murat. The only deposition that is credible is the Smiths.  %£&)**# (Goncalo Amaral)

Now please correct me if I am wrong, but I think that it is a complete myth that Jane pointed at Murat.   And am I correct in stating that Amaral started the myth?  Nothing in the statements or legal documents to support the claim that Jane pointed to Murat as Tannerman ... that I know of anyhow.   Where is your source for this info PFinder?

Offline Brietta

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1171 on: February 06, 2015, 12:49:23 AM »
The PJ discredits Jane Tanner's testimony. They say that when she saw said man with the child, you [Gerry] were chatting nearby and it was impossible that you hadn't seen him as well…
 
(Gerry says he didn't see because his back was turned while he was chatting with a friend.)
 
Jane Tanner's testimony has evolved in an inverse manner to human mentality. Initially, she had seen only a person at a distance. As time went by, she started remembering details in such a manner that at the end, she even remembered the texture of the clothing that the man and the little girl were wearing. That was how she pointed at Murat. The only deposition that is credible is the Smiths.  %£&)**# (Goncalo Amaral)

Jane Tanner never deviated from the fact she had seen a man carrying a child and never "pointed at Murat".
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Bert Singe

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1172 on: February 06, 2015, 07:28:56 AM »
I said "probably". If you are carrying a child some distance you normally support the heaviest part of its body with your strongest arm.

That's not true at all. I would begin with my most comfortable position i.e. The position I am used to and would only switch position when tired. The new position would then be with the child upon on my shoulder like smithman. All this because my right hand then remains free to use most of the time.

You've either not thought it through correctly or the way people hold a child when right handed is actually random, in the same way that some right handed people wear a watch on their right hand and fasten with their left. I have always worn on the left so that my good hand is free to do the fastening.

Offline Bert Singe

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1173 on: February 06, 2015, 07:31:27 AM »
75 feet Sadie? Just like being in your back garden.  8(0(*

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1174 on: February 06, 2015, 09:25:35 AM »
So that's what it was all about, was it?  Amaral trying to prove his wonky theory.  He had to have Gerry and Jez as close to Tannerman as possible in order that he could claim that it was impossible for Gerry not to have seen Tannerman

For starters, the spot above the gate to 5A, where Amaral has falsely placed Gerry and Jez is still  22.7 metres away [75 feet - measure it yourself on GEarth if you dont believe me] from Tannerman.  And the road was poorly lit.   Sure, if you are a doting Amaral fan you will believe the garbage that Gerry would have seen Tannerman at that distance in a dimly lit road.  Get real PFinder, purleaze

Additionally Tannerman was to Gerrys north and Gerry was facing East.  At an angle of virtually 90^ to the direction that Gerry was looking.  Periferal images finish at about 40^ IIRC [From Heribertos information].    Tannerman was way beyond Gerrys line of vision and way beyond Jezes line of vision also.

Amaral should know these things as a senior cop.  Why was he so desperate to undermine Janes sighting?
Could it be that at that stage, he was keen to convict the Mccanns and had to try and convince people that Tannerman was a figment of Janes imagination ? .... or worse that she was "in league with them?
 

I think you are muddled here PFinder.  This was referring to Gerrys position relative to Jane as she passed by surely?   Nothing to do with Tannerman at all ?
 


I think that when distances are mentioned they are 5 - 10 metres.  Remember both Jane and Tannerman were walking so the distances relative to each other would change as they moved.

All the initial statements were VERY short IIRC.   As time went on the statements wereengthened dramataically and she gave more detailed descriptions.   There was talk that she received hypnosis to improve her memory.  I have no idea whether this is true or not.

 
Now please correct me if I am wrong, but I think that it is a complete myth that Jane pointed at Murat.   And am I correct in stating that Amaral started the myth?  Nothing in the statements or legal documents to support the claim that Jane pointed to Murat as Tannerman ... that I know of anyhow.   Where is your source for this info PFinder?

Jane Tanner confirms in her rog that she thought it was Murat at the time. Amaral ain't lying!

"when they took me round for the surveillance to look at, and I’m guessing now it’s MURAT they wanted me to look at and, you know, all the other bits and bobs, I really don’t know, but I think I’d prefer just to stick with what I said in my original statement."

"I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck." Not Smithman!

"Erm, so I went off in the back of this like refrigerated, well it was pretending to be a refrigerated, erm, van and took it round to the point on the road and obviously, in hindsight now, I realise they were probably calling Robert MURAT to try and get him to walk across, across the top of the road so that, you know, I could see.  But it was a bit odd because there was a car, where we were parked there was a car that moved just at that point that he appeared and then two other people walked by, so I didn’t really, but I didn’t even recognise it as the person I’d been talking to five minutes before, well, you know, half an hour before, so.  Erm, and then, erm, then went, I think because it has gone a bit wrong because this car had been there and then tried to set it up elsewhere, but again I couldn’t really see, I couldn’t really see that well and, you know, it didn’t look, it didn’t jog, jog any memories."

Reply    “You know, or said yeah, had said that he wasn’t there on the night, so you know was immediately, I think it was immediately, I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”.
4078    “No”.
 Reply    “But I just thought it was”.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline lordpookles

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1175 on: February 06, 2015, 09:33:15 AM »
Really, so Jane Tanner fingered Robert murat? I did think that was a myth or fabrication too.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1176 on: February 06, 2015, 09:41:32 AM »
Really, so Jane Tanner fingered Robert murat? I did think that was a myth or fabrication too.

Anything Sadie don't like she claims is a myth  8)--)) 

The only deposition that is credible is the Smiths. (GA) Too right and he disappeared on the 3 May along with his Maddy lookalike. How extraordinary!

« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 09:44:42 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Benice

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1177 on: February 06, 2015, 10:10:12 AM »
Jane Tanner confirms in her rog that she thought it was Murat at the time. Amaral ain't lying!

"when they took me round for the surveillance to look at, and I’m guessing now it’s MURAT they wanted me to look at and, you know, all the other bits and bobs, I really don’t know, but I think I’d prefer just to stick with what I said in my original statement."

"I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck." Not Smithman!

"Erm, so I went off in the back of this like refrigerated, well it was pretending to be a refrigerated, erm, van and took it round to the point on the road and obviously, in hindsight now, I realise they were probably calling Robert MURAT to try and get him to walk across, across the top of the road so that, you know, I could see.  But it was a bit odd because there was a car, where we were parked there was a car that moved just at that point that he appeared and then two other people walked by, so I didn’t really, but I didn’t even recognise it as the person I’d been talking to five minutes before, well, you know, half an hour before, so.  Erm, and then, erm, then went, I think because it has gone a bit wrong because this car had been there and then tried to set it up elsewhere, but again I couldn’t really see, I couldn’t really see that well and, you know, it didn’t look, it didn’t jog, jog any memories."

Reply    “You know, or said yeah, had said that he wasn’t there on the night, so you know was immediately, I think it was immediately, I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”.
4078    “No”.
 Reply    “But [size=14pt]I just thought it was[/size]”.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE_TANNER_RIGATORY.htm


In view of what she says elsewhere and particularly at the end of her statement re RM  - that part (in blue) doesn't make sense - unless it is an unfinished sentence imo.

There are several examples of people stopping in the middle of a sentence in the rogs. but instead of the typist indicating that by a series of .......................... - he/she merely puts a full stop - which is misleading to the reader.

JT's comments about Murat are made with hindsight.   At the time she attended the ID parade she had no idea that it involved him.


A couple of examples of JT ending in the middle of the sentence:'

Jayne Tanner

 I can’t remember what we did specifically in the time in between. I think we just had something to eat and just I think we were in Dave and Fi’s apartment, but.

JT
 I mean, obviously I don’t  know, I don’t know Jez, I hadn’t actually, I hadn’t had any contact with Jez through the week, I didn’t, you know, he wasn’t somebody we chatted to, so, you know, in terms of him recognising me or knowing me, he didn’t know me, so”.

JT
Reply    “I know, the problem is, it’s just getting the Press and the”.

End quotes


IMO for clarity - those full stops should be a line of full stops.
IE ''I just thought it was.''  should have been typed as  ''I just thought it was...................''







The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1178 on: February 06, 2015, 10:46:45 AM »
Can't you read?

 I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”. But I just thought it was”.

Amaral isn't lying! He has no reason to lie like others.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Benice

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1179 on: February 06, 2015, 11:16:18 AM »
Can't you read?

 I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”. But I just thought it was”.

Amaral isn't lying! He has no reason to lie like others.

So we are being asked to believe - that it wasn't an unfinished sentence -  and that JT effectively said ''I don't think it was Murat I saw - I just thought it was Murat I saw?' -- and we should ignore the fact that that is a complete contradiction of everything else she says about RM.

She has never claimed it was Murat she saw on 3rd May and she did not identify him at the ID parade.  She didn't even know he was involved until after he was made an Arguido and his piccie appeared on TV - after the ID parade.     If she had ever thought it was him BEFORE he was made an Arguido - there would be a witness statement to prove it.  There is nothing in the files - as confirmed by the PT AG.

Amaral lied his head off re JT in his book and continued to do so in his interviews.  Once he decided it was the McCanns wot dunnit - JT became an 'inconvenience' and so he set out to discredit her.  IMO

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Carana

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1180 on: February 06, 2015, 11:18:35 AM »

In view of what she says elsewhere and particularly at the end of her statement re RM  - that part (in blue) doesn't make sense - unless it is an unfinished sentence imo.

There are several examples of people stopping in the middle of a sentence in the rogs. but instead of the typist indicating that by a series of .......................... - he/she merely puts a full stop - which is misleading to the reader.

JT's comments about Murat are made with hindsight.   At the time she attended the ID parade she had no idea that it involved him.


A couple of examples of JT ending in the middle of the sentence:'

Jayne Tanner

 I can’t remember what we did specifically in the time in between. I think we just had something to eat and just I think we were in Dave and Fi’s apartment, but.

JT
 I mean, obviously I don’t  know, I don’t know Jez, I hadn’t actually, I hadn’t had any contact with Jez through the week, I didn’t, you know, he wasn’t somebody we chatted to, so, you know, in terms of him recognising me or knowing me, he didn’t know me, so”.

JT
Reply    “I know, the problem is, it’s just getting the Press and the”.

End quotes


IMO for clarity - those full stops should be a line of full stops.
IE ''I just thought it was.''  should have been typed as  ''I just thought it was...................''

I agree, and this was pointed out quite some time ago on a different thread, but these arguments are cyclical. Ending the extract at precisely that point is leaving out the context and manner of transcription, thus potentially misleading.

Only an assumption, of course...




Offline faithlilly

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1181 on: February 06, 2015, 11:25:24 AM »
So we are being asked to believe - that it wasn't an unfinished sentence -  and that JT effectively said ''I don't think it was Murat I saw - I just thought it was Murat I saw?' -- and we should ignore the fact that that is a complete contradiction of everything else she says about RM.

She has never claimed it was Murat she saw on 3rd May and she did not identify him at the ID parade.  She didn't even know he was involved until after he was made an Arguido and his piccie appeared on TV - after the ID parade.     If she had ever thought it was him BEFORE he was made an Arguido - there would be a witness statement to prove it.  There is nothing in the files - as confirmed by the PT AG.

Amaral lied his head off re JT in his book and continued to do so in his interviews.  Once he decided it was the McCanns wot dunnit - JT became an 'inconvenience' and so he set out to discredit her.  IMO

It would have been pretty obvious once the PJ paraded him in front of her while in the van that this was the guy they had in there sights. She may not have known it was Murat but she certainly knew he was in the frame.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1182 on: February 06, 2015, 11:26:26 AM »
OK, let's have it in the right context and not bits taken from different statements.

!"when they took me round for the surveillance to look at, and I’m guessing now it’s MURAT they wanted me to look at and, you know, all the other bits and bobs, I really don’t know, but I think I’d prefer just to stick with what I said in my original statement.

""I mean, I think, so the things that I’m happy, that are still in my head, that still stick in my head is the hair and it was longer, it was sort of longish and, erm, I don’t know how to (inaudible), but each, each, almost the hair was long, the bits of hair were long, so it was long into the neck." Not Smithman!"

Erm, so I went off in the back of this like refrigerated, well it was pretending to be a refrigerated, erm, van and took it round to the point on the road and obviously, in hindsight now, I realise they were probably calling Robert MURAT to try and get him to walk across, across the top of the road so that, you know, I could see.  But it was a bit odd because there was a car, where we were parked there was a car that moved just at that point that he appeared and then two other people walked by, so I didn’t really, but I didn’t even recognise it as the person I’d been talking to five minutes before, well, you know, half an hour before, so.  Erm, and then, erm, then went, I think because it has gone a bit wrong because this car had been there and then tried to set it up elsewhere, but again I couldn’t really see, I couldn’t really see that well and, you know, it didn’t look, it didn’t jog, jog any memories.

Replies

"4078    “Now you are left with that mental image in your head about the man carrying the child”

Reply    “Umm”.

4078    “And you said, you described his hair quite well.  Having seen MURAT then and obviously in the papers since, could you link the two of those?”
Reply    “I don’t think so.  I mean, I don’t, phew, I don’t, I don’t think it, no, there doesn’t, there’s no, but then the person I see in the paper doesn’t really look like my recollection of the person I met on the way to meet Bob SMALL.  It’s really annoying because normally I would have probably taken more notice but I was so worried about what I was going to do, because I didn’t know at this point at all, I didn’t really take any notice, but I think it was too short and I remember it being, being long into the neck and not so.  Again, I don’t really, when I saw Robert MURAT outside his house he looked quite little to me, but then when you see him on the telly he seems quite bit, so I can’t, again, I don’t think the build, the build was right, I don’t”.
4078    “So you don’t feel, in your heart of hearts”.
Reply    “No”.

4078    “You don’t feel it was the same person?”

Reply    “No, I don’t, no”.
................................................................................................


Where Jane says "I thought it was" is mentioned re those seeing Murat on the night.

4078    “Can’t find the specific part in there but I think, obviously it’s covered in the first one anyway, so it’s not particularly relevant to any (inaudible) time, going back to the second one there.  Before we move on to then Gerry and Kate’s questions that they want to ask, is there anything else that you want to say in relation to everything we’ve discussed so far”? Reply    “Erm I think the only part which, I mean it’s more relevant to everybody else than to me, it’s probably some of the Robert MURAT bits, in terms of erm Rachel, Fi and Russ and into, erm it was sort of how that came about and how they came to give their statements on that, I don’t know whether it’s a good time to talk about that”?


4078    “Yes, yes go on”.
Reply    “Erm well I think it’s when I’d done the, well I did the surveillance and then the next day after that, I think it came on Sky News about whether they were searching, what the MURAT’s house, so that’s Rachel sort of came running down at that point and sort of said, have you seen this blah, blah and at this point, nobody knew that I’d done the surveillance cos the Portuguese Police were very adamant that I shouldn’t tell anybody and I didn’t tell anybody for days actually, I didn’t even tell them then that it was actually, that I’d done it, I mean it was a couple of days afterwards.  So Rachel came down and sort of said, oh I saw him blah, blah, blah and then I think Russell, I can’t remember who else but then somebody else said oh they, they saw him and etc., so at that point it was, I rang Bob SMALL cos I’d got, I’d got his number from the day before for them and you know, they sort of, you know to say, oh is this, is this relevant and also I wanted to tell him that I’d seen him on the way to the doing the surveillance as well yeah just for that, so I think it’s just to make the point really that I think at that point, they didn’t know that Robert MURAT said he wasn’t there on the night”.


4078    “Right”.
 Reply    “You know, or said yeah, had said that he wasn’t there on the night, so you know was immediately, I think it was immediately, I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”.
4078    “No”.
 Reply    “But I just thought it was”.
4078    “Because there had been some dispute as to whether they’ve actually seen him when they’ve said they’ve seen him”.
 Reply    “Yeah I think, I just want to make it clear that from my own point of view, they gave that information as soon as it came onto Sky and asked and you know they were sort of like, oh let’s ring Bob SMALL to see if it’s relevant at this point and at that point, none of us knew that he wasn’t there on you know, that he didn’t say that he was there on the night and”.
4078    “Yes”.
 Reply    “And I, I mean I didn’t myself see him on the night at all but somebody did say to me, who translated for you, was it the lady or the man and it, it was the lady, I said, Sylvie and I hadn’t seen a man but again I don’t know whether that has any relevance that there was somebody else there translating, you know during the night so”.
4078    “Okay, that’s certainly a point worth bringing up when we interview the other people that have seen him there on the night”.
 Reply    “Yeah exactly, I’m not trying to, cos I feel you know, if he’s not involved, the poor chap’s had as much crap as us really, I feel very, you know, he’s not involved but I do think it’s important that”.


IMO, Jane was saying, she thought it was the right thing to do, letting Bob Small know
« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 11:30:55 AM by DCI »
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Carana

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1183 on: February 06, 2015, 11:31:14 AM »
Can't you read?

 I’m not trying to push anything onto Robert MURAT’s door, cos as I say I don’t think it was him that I saw”. But I just thought it was”.

Amaral isn't lying! He has no reason to lie like others.

I thought that his book was supposed to be based on the investigation up until he left it on 2 October? The rogs didn't take place until April 08...

If Jane had positively identified Murat during that van episode, is it feasible that a statement wouldn't have been taken to the effect?


Offline Benice

Re: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!
« Reply #1184 on: February 06, 2015, 11:34:07 AM »
It would have been pretty obvious once the PJ paraded him in front of her while in the van that this was the guy they had in there sights. She may not have known it was Murat but she certainly knew he was in the frame.
[/b]

AFAIK JT didn't know any of the men used in the ID parade - so how could she decide which one of them was in the frame?     
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal