Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 443757 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

In Jeremy's first interview by UK police he drew a sketch which puts the conversation on the corner of the path.
IMO "the pathway leading to the front of the apartment blocks about 5 meters to his left" is the most accurate indication of the chat location. (SOURCE: VOL 13, P 3409).

It places the chat level with the gate and steps, 5 m from the alleyway, and so does other text in the same source "near to the gate".

Mr Amaral also places the chat level with the steps and gate. Here is a still from his video reconstruction of the chat... (SOURCE: 9e7ug0BfNy4)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2015, 09:12:13 PM by pegasus »

Offline Anna

IMO "the pathway leading to the front of the apartment blocks about 5 meters to his left" is the most accurate indication of the chat location. (SOURCE: VOL 13, P 3409).

It places the chat level with the gate and steps, and so does other text in the same source "near to the gate".

Mr Amaral also places the chat level with the steps and gate. Here is a still from his video reconstruction of the chat... (SOURCE: 9e7ug0BfNy4)


Gerry was walking(presumably back to the Restaurant) when Jez saw him, so he must have already come out of the gate and was walking.....................So he could have walked as far as the alleyway corner, which is a very short distance from the gate.

CARTAS ROGATORIAS 5
Pages 25 to 29

LEICESTERSHIRE POLICE SQUAD
WITNESS TESTIMONY OF JEREMY WILKINS
Occupation:

This statement, consisting of five pages, each signed by me, is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have willfully states in it anything I know to be false or do not believe to be true.

Date: 8 April 2008
Signature:
I am the above referenced person and live at the address previously given to this police. I gave an earlier statement to the Metropolitan Police relative to my holidays in Portugal in May of 2007. I stayed at the Praia da Luz resort from where Madeleine McCann disappeared. We arrived on Saturday, April 28, 2007.
Yesterday, I received a visit from Leciestershire police officers with the intent of clarifying some aspects and to obtain any possible additional information. The conversation was recorded as was the interview which was conducted by the same agents. I was told that these questions originated from the rogatory letter sent by the Portuguese authorities. I am aware that my deposition is subject to the Portuguese Criminal Code in addition to British law.
I was asked to read my original statement to refresh my memory for which I was given authorization.
What follows are answers to the questions posed to me in the following order:

Q. Relative to the time I met Gerry McCann on the Thursday night of May 3, 2007;
As stated in my original deposition, I believe that I left the apartment around 20h30. I calculate that I met Gerry on the road between 20h45 and 21h15. I am aware of the importance of this hour and am also aware that the media announced our meeting time as 21h05. Even if this were correct, I have no idea from where such information originated. It is not possible to give you a more exact time.

Q. From which direction Gerry travelling when you met?
From previous conversations had with Gerry, I am of the notion of the usual routine of the group in relation to checking on their children when they were in the Tapas Bar. I also was aware of the location of the McCann apartment. Naturally when I met him that night, I assumed that he had gone to check on the children. I cannot affirm if I saw him exactly leaving the apartment through the passageway, and if he was heading towards the tapas Bar.

Q. Relative to the exact location you met Gerry?
I left my apartment pushing my son’s pram so that he could sleep. I did not have a particular direction to follow nor did I have a specific time to do this. I left the apartment and turned right. I walked via the lower street, looked to the building block where the McCann apartment was situated and saw a woman dressed in purple clothing. I referred to this woman in relation to the questions asked by Jane Tanner. At the next crossing, I turned right and continued on down the hill. At this point, I saw a man that was coming from the road and was headed to the reception. I believe that he was with a woman but I cannot be precise of any detail about her. It was a tall Caucasian man, with blonde hair in ‘rasta style’ tied with a band instead of free flowing. When I arrived, I headed to the WC near the pool area. He also was in the WC but appeared to be a taking a long time. I do not remember if he was still in that place when I left. I did not see a woman in that zone. I had never before seen this man and did not see him after this. The next morning, after having become aware of Madeleine’s disappearance, we went to breakfast and left the children in the club. Bridget and I returned to the apartment and minutes afterward, a uniformed police officer, accompanied by a British man serving as interpreter, showed up. Later we came to know him as Robert Murat. I do not remember if he gave me his details but recently when I was cleaning a bag, I came across a card with his name and telephone number. I believe that he may have given this to me so that we could contact him in case we had any additional information to offer. The police officer asked us if we had noticed anything out of the normal and Robert Murat translated. I spoke to him of the “rasta man” and the police officer took some notes on paper. He also noted our names and passport numbers. During the days that followed, as we passed through the police cordon, we noticed Robert Murat on numerous occasions. On Friday, the 4th of May or Saturday, 5th of May 2007, at one of the police cordons, I again saw Robert Murat. He told me that they had investigated the lead of the “rasta man” but that he was a local man and that everything was okay. He thanked me for my collaboration. I never saw Robert prior to his visit to our apartment with the police officer.
After leaving the WC, I continued to walk around the back of the tennis court, and returned via the pathway opposite the pool in the Tapas complex. Whilst walking the streets, I was hoping my son would fall asleep. Some of the walkways did not have an exit and for this reason I walked practically in circles. When walking one of these paths, I came across a tourist called Curtis with his girlfriend whose name I do not know. He also knew Gerry from the tennis lessons. I remember passing by them but I assumed they were headed to dinner. Eventually, I left one road to the other side of the street to the pool complex, between the McCann apartment and the Tapas Bar. In order to visualise this street, I believe it was the street most used by the news agencies and journalists as all the parked cars indicated during the coverage period.
When I left the street, I remember seeing Gerry on the other side of the same. I believe that there was some speculation in the press regarding the circumstances of this encounter. I remember that I crossed the street to talk to Gerry. According to what I remember, Gerry was walking when I spotted him. As I mentioned previously, I assumed that he had gone to check on the children and was headed back to the Tapas Bar.
From what I remember, the conversation happened right there on the pathway but I am not certain who was located exactly where.

Q. Relative to the time we conversed;
I am more certain of this than I am of our relative positions.
The conversation lasted for approximately three to five minutes. We spoke of the care of children and how they were getting along. He told me something like “he was on night duty”. I explained to him that I was returning to the apartment as my son was now sleeping. I assumed that Gerry was off to dine with the group in the Tapas bar, but I cannot precisely say this came from him or if I figured this out from our previous conversations regarding the checking system for the children. I remember that Gerry told me if he had stayed another week, he would likely do as I was doing and would stay with the children one night. It appeared as though he was jealous of what I was doing, but given that he was with a big group, he felt the obligation to meet with them every night, and the chosen location was the Tapas bar. I believe that there was some sort of agreement with the tapas Bar as they appeared to have a reservation every night and it was impossible for other guests to book at spot there.
I do not know if we were face to face or side to side when this conversation occurred. As I had the pram with me I was rocking it so my son could sleep, it seems to me that I was in the downward direction, but it is possible that I was in the opposite direction.
I do not remember having seen anyone else at this time besides Gerry. After leaving each other, Gerry walked downward in the direction of the Tapas Bar and I began to walk in the other direction, up the pathway. I turned left at the crossing and passed the apartment. I did not meet anyone else during my walk and once in my apartment, I did not venture out again.

Q. Relative to whether I know Jane Tanner;
Now I know her name, description of the clothes and photos which I have seen in the press. At that time I knew of her as a member of the group but did not know her name. I do not remember having seen her when I spoke with Gerry, but I believe I saw her when I first ventured out. She was stopped on the street in front of one of the group’s apartments when I passed her down towards the exit to my apartment. I do not know if it was her apartment or not. I remember that she was wearing the colour purple.
Q. Relative to the passerby/transient:
I can affirm that it was a quiet street and it was very unlikely that someone could have passed by be in this way but this as an assumption and I do not remember anything having happened.

Q. Relative to anything strange in Gerry’s behavior;
I can affirm without any reservation that Gerry’s behavior was absolutely normal. He was not preoccupied and conversed and appeared relaxed. He behaved if the same form as with the other times we met.

Q. Relative to the visibility and lighting conditions;
I believe that the time I left it was dusk (the term lusco-fusco used in this statement is a Portuguese expression to define those brief moments when day and night intermingle in an undefined state, dusk, when day isn’t still night) or nighttime when I returned and I do not remember if it was already dark when I spoke with Gerry. There were no weather conditions that impacted visibility. Given the lighting and the atmospheric conditions, I believe that it would have been possible to see if an individual was near but evidently, the greater the distance, the harder the difficulty in seeing. I would say that when I spoke with Gerry it was possible to recognize someone I knew who was passing on foot at the crossing at the top of the hill or to describe approximately someone unknown from that distance.

Q. relative to the return to Portugal to realize a reconstitution;
I spoke with the police for a long time regarding this topic. I had some reservation about the press’ intrusion onto my personal life and the hurt that resulted. I actually think that I would prefer not to take part. I have helped the investigation and am particularly interested in the investigative team gave me a solid base with would justify the reconstitution.
I was also asked question raised by the arguidos, to which I responded as follows.
Relative to my familiarity with Gerry and Kate;
I got to know them on Monday, 30th of April 2007 when I arrived at the tennis lesson. I had booked lessons and believed that Gerry had done the same. I believe that Kate was with Gerry before the first lesson but did not play.

Relative to the encounters between the 29th of April and the 3rd of May;
I played against Gerry in the tennis lessons and we played a game outside the lessons together with two friends who made up part of his group. Kate was in the immediate area of the resort but the reason for our meetings was normally tennis. We got along well together.

Relative to seeing them with Madeleine and the other children;
I do not have grand memories of Madeleine but did see her on some occasions with her parents in the crèche. My last memory of the twins, specifically, was in the company of adults (I think they were friends that travelled here) in the pool zone and also on the day that we left, Saturday 5th of May, 2007.
I never saw any member of the family inside or possessing a vehicle.

Relative to the encounter with Gerry and Kate on the 3rd of May 2007;
I had a tennis lesson with Gerry from 10h00 to 11h00. After the lesson we went to fetch the children from the crèche. I saw Gerry and Kate near the pool relaxing. I remember that they were talking to a British tennis instructor whose name is George or Georgina. I remember that she was telling them a bit about her personal life. Later that day, I went once again to collect the children from the crèche and believe I saw them there, but I cannot affirm with exactitude if it was that day or if had been on a previous day. We did not see each other again on this day.

Relative to when I became aware of Madeleine’s disappearance;
After having gone to sleep on the 3rd of May, we were woken around 01H30 by the manager of the resort, John Hill and by a friend of Gerry’s. It was them who told me what had happened. I did not see or hear anything else than what has been stated in this statement. I did not take part in any searches. I offered my help but it was not necessary. I did not see Gerry and Kate again until the afternoon of our departure. They were in the tourist complex. This was on Saturday, 5th of May 2007. If was a very emotional encounter and I did not know what to say to them. I went over to Gerry and gave him a pat on the shoulder and spoke briefly with Kate. Together they appeared constrained and I became emotional as well.

Relative to the meeting with Gerry McCann;
I have already testified to the time of our encounter in this statement and have also spoken to the location where we met, when I saw him for the first time, what I observed regarding the details of our conversation. The same applies to Jane Tanner.

Relative to the sighting in Dr. Francisco Gentil street;
From the location where we met for our conversation, it is possible to see the top of the hill. I cannot confirm if I was always turned in this direction. It is definitely possible that someone could have crossed holding a child without my noticing.

I do not remember any other information or relevant details which could help this investigation.
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post437.html#p437
« Last Edit: May 12, 2015, 09:16:22 PM by Anna »
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline mercury

Not necessarily Anna. Gerry could have been walking down the street and stopped to meet at the gate, where in fact JW said they had their conversation on his return via the front and not patio door. He did say in his first statement he used the front door with his key, so if that is true will have walked around and down on his return.

Anyway,I have forgotten the point of this discussion and have an early shift. Catch up tomorrow maybe.

Offline pegasus


Gerry was walking(presumably back to the Restaurant) when Jez saw him, so he must have already come out of the gate and was walking.....................So he could have walked as far as the alleyway corner, which is a very short distance from the gate.

CARTAS ROGATORIAS 5
Pages 25 to 29......
(snip)
Yes I understand what you are saying. But I think the chat was level with the gate. There are various ways the chat could end up being here.

Also the map by JT draws the chat is further north than the alleyway.
About 30% of the way from the alleyway to the front of the building?

Offline Anna

Yes I understand what you are saying. But I think the chat was level with the gate. There are various ways the chat could end up being here.

Also the map by JT draws the chat is further north than the alleyway.
About 30% of the way from the alleyway to the front of the building?


I think we have crossed wires. If Gerry was walking towards the restaurant when Jez spotted him. He would be at the alleyway side of the wall...as his sketch, already shown by, G in a previous post.
There is so many "Ifs" that it is a waste of time arguing about it.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pegasus

Snip from JT map and a photo at same scale

Offline Anna

Snip from JT map and a photo at same scale


Jez's sketch, who was standing there.

“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pegasus


I think we have crossed wires. If Gerry was walking towards the restaurant when Jez spotted him. He would be at the alleyway side of the wall...as his sketch, already shown by, G in a previous post.
There is so many "Ifs" that it is a waste of time arguing about it.
Yes agreed lots of ifs, but IMO it is good to work on, it decides the audibilty.
ETA yes I see JW sketch, IMO both that and the 5 metre text description should be considered
« Last Edit: May 12, 2015, 10:52:08 PM by pegasus »

Offline G-Unit

Not necessarily Anna. Gerry could have been walking down the street and stopped to meet at the gate, where in fact JW said they had their conversation on his return via the front and not patio door. He did say in his first statement he used the front door with his key, so if that is true will have walked around and down on his return.

Anyway,I have forgotten the point of this discussion and have an early shift. Catch up tomorrow maybe.

As in Gerry's first statement;

In this way, at about 21.05 the witness came to the Club, entered the room using his respective key, the door being locked, went to his children's bedroom and checked that the twins were fine, as was Madeleine. "He then went to the WC" where he remained for a few moments, left, and bumped into a person he had played tennis with and who had a child's push chair, he was also British, he had a short conversation with him, "returning after that to the restaurant."
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm

But immediately after he says;

At about 21.30 his friend Matt (member of the group) went to the apartment, where his children were and on his way went to the witness' apartment, entering by means of a glass sliding door that was always unlocked and was located laterally to the building.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm

This first statement makes no sense whatsoever. Why would Gerry use the front door if the patio door was unlocked?  The only way it makes sense is if the apartment was fully locked up at 9.05pm when Gerry went in, but the patio door was unlocked when Matt went in. In other words, Gerry entered through the locked front door, then exited by unlocking the patio door. Perhaps he just stepped out for some reason and was going to go back in and lock up again? Instead he heard or saw Jeremy Wilkins approaching and stepped out to speak to him, then forgot about the patio door and returned to the restaurant.

A little later in the statement he's forgotten about the unlocked patio door again, then he remembers;

At about 22.00 it was his wife Kate who went to check on the children. She entered the apartment by the door using the key and saw immediately that the door to the children's bedroom was completely open, the window was also open, the blinds were raised and the curtains were drawn open.
The side door leading to the living room was closed, which as previously stated, was never left locked.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN.htm

Looking at the 'Activity book' timeline, Gerry's meeting with Jeremy Wilkins isn't on there. He is supposed to have checked 9.10-9.15pm. Jan Tanner saw the 'abductor' at 9.20pm.  Had the timeline been correct, Jane wouldn't have passed the two men chatting. Did Jane leave the restaurant earlier than the timeline says or was Gerry delayed by meeting Jeremy? Whichever; neither man saw her, which casts doubt upon her statement.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Yes agreed lots of ifs, but IMO it is good to work on, it decides the audibilty.
ETA yes I see JW sketch, IMO both that and the 5 metre text description should be considered

There is quite a lot of discussion about it here, pegasus

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.0
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Anna

Yes agreed lots of ifs, but IMO it is good to work on, it decides the audibilty.
ETA yes I see JW sketch, IMO both that and the 5 metre text description should be considered

So very many times and so many images later, Pegasus, and we still have no idea who was where. If we cannot trust the witness statements, its a useless task.

I have dragged up some old posts with images... We can take our pick really.

ETA
Click on links and use back arrow to bring you back after viewing each (guess you knew that, but some might not)

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg35271#msg35271
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg35369#msg35369
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg35430#msg35430
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg35484#msg35484
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg35514#msg35514
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg36020#msg36020
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg36136#msg36136
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg36450#msg36450
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg146531#msg146531
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg146674#msg146674
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg146753#msg146753
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg146930#msg146930
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg149315#msg149315
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1249.msg151939#msg151939
« Last Edit: May 12, 2015, 11:37:26 PM by Anna »
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline sadie

Yes agreed lots of ifs, but IMO it is good to work on, it decides the audibilty.
ETA yes I see JW sketch, IMO both that and the 5 metre text description should be considered
Pegasus

This has been thoroughly discussed before as you surely must know. 
There were three pointers to the spot being at the corner of the alleyway

1)  Jezes map, which has an absolute data point .  i.e the alleyway corner ... and that is where he marks his cross   [As in Annas post above]


2)  Jane Tanner in the Cutting Edge (full) video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atfDV7imHHY
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atfDV7imHHY[/youtube]

See at about 9.40 to 10.23 (ish) how Jane is adamant about where Gerry and Jez were chatting.  On the edge of the pavement on the Alleyway corner again.  Gerry got it wrong.  He is out of line with everyone else.


If you any doubts about Janes sincerity watch through until about 12.40; most especially at about 12.25 - 12.40


3)  I dont intend to go thru this yet again in fine detail, but

In Jezes one statement he clearly describes seeing Jerry walking after he leaves 5A gate.   and at the moment Jez sees Gerry as he is on the pavement opposite the Tapas reception. 
Now it wouldn't stretch your very good brain Pegasus to realise from GEarth that the alleyway corner is about half way between the two men.  For them to have met any higher up would have meant that Gerry did not move towards Jez at all.  Jez says that Gerry was walking IIRC.


The only other places mentioned by witnesses each have only one pointer to them .... so could you please have the good grace to concede three pointers against one, means that they DID MEET on the alleyway corner.   


Three confirmations is very conclusive, dont you agree?


Please dont keep raking it up.  It has become a bore.

Offline pegasus

In the files, there are two documents in which JT gives the chat location. About 15 hrs after seeing the chat, the map drawn for police places the chat noticeably further north than the alley. About 8000 hrs after seeing the chat, the recollection in rog is that it was about level with the alley.  Memory (anyone's, mine, yours) of small details is more accurate on the first day after an event, than it is 11 months later.

Offline pathfinder73

Snip from JT map and a photo at same scale

That's why I think if Jane saw them both but didn't hear them talking then she saw the man crossing from much further away and turned left onto the path to go back to the apartment instead of passing them. That is the only logical conclusion if she saw them but they didn't see her. Gerry had his back to to the gate and Jez was facing him so they weren't looking in her direction before she turned left onto the path. She can't pass them at the gate without being seen. It is impossible!

First statements from the McCanns:

It is stressed that when one of the members of the group, JANE, went to her apartment to see her children, at around 9.10/9.15 pm, from behind and at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road next to the club, she saw a person carrying a child in pyjamas. JANE will be better able to clarify this situation.

Why is 50 metres said by them? From the top of the road to the tapas entrance. They may have thought that was about 50 metres but what is the distance?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Alice Purjorick

That's why I think if Jane saw them both but didn't hear them talking then she saw the man crossing from much further away and turned left onto the path to go back to the apartment instead of passing them. That is the only logical conclusion if she saw them but they didn't see her. Gerry had his back to to the gate and Jez was facing him so they weren't looking in her direction before she turned left onto the path. She can't pass them at the gate without being seen. It is impossible!

First statements from the McCanns:

It is stressed that when one of the members of the group, JANE, went to her apartment to see her children, at around 9.10/9.15 pm, from behind and at a distance of about 50 metres, on the road next to the club, she saw a person carrying a child in pyjamas. JANE will be better able to clarify this situation.

Why is 50 metres said by them? From the top of the road to the tapas entrance. They may have thought that was about 50 metres but what is the distance?

The distance from the centreline of the reception building north to the road junction is 45m approx.
Give or take the alley way is 10/12m from reception building.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey