Author Topic: Gerry and Jez chat while Jane walks by. Seconds later she spots Tannerman!  (Read 443705 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Thank you for posting that video Madeleine was here part 4/5 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na4aBr5PTYY&feature=youtube_gdata_player


According to Jane this is what the scene was like...

I should point out that Jez Wilkins corroborates this version too.



Has this image been altered to reflect the proper body dimentions  ? 

It doesn't seem to have been with the  Jane Tanner figure

The wall she is seen to be passing very close to is roughly the same height as the gate  (  waist high to Gerry in the photo )  ...  yet it is as high as her neck

She is quite a tall woman and it seems she is somewhat  'diminuished'  in this depiction

By the proportions shown there she would have to take three or four steps to cross the width of the path  ...  in reality it would take her one step

The figures are too small in relation to their surroundings,  which is giving a skewed image of the distance between them  (  imo )   
« Last Edit: April 21, 2014, 06:34:47 PM by John »

Offline John

The wall does increase in height due to the incline and Gerry was standing on a step behind the gate but I will increase the size of the silhouettes slightly to compensate.  Thanks.

« Last Edit: April 14, 2013, 08:53:34 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
The wall does increase in height due to the incline and Gerry was standing on a step behind the gate but I will increase the size of the silhouettes slightly to compensate.  Thanks.

The width of the pavement only allows for two adults to walk side by side on it

When you change the dimensions of the figures you could use that as a gauge  (  as it is,  the size of the Tanner figure would allow for four  other  adults of the same size to stand abreast  with her  ) 

Offline sadie

Sorry I have been away so long.

Had a sudden onset of vomitting and d......, then a long several hour sleep.  Think I am OK again

 8(8-))
Wonder if it was the calling of a child, an item, that brought it on?  Only joking, but I am VERY upset that anyone would be so insensitive as to call Madeleine, any child, that.  It shows an attitude of mind .. and other things >@@(*&)


-------------------------------------------------------------------


Isabod, why haven't you read the thread?  Why haven't you read the width of the pavement there?

It was about 1.8 to 2.0 metres wide(at the corner as indicated on Jezes hand drawn map) so plenty of space even if they were both on the pavement > What's your problem?

Was it you that tried to make out that I had some agenda for wanting them to be on the eastern pavement. or was that someone else?


Wrong again 8(>((




Offline faithlilly

@ sadie

Sorry to hear you are unwell. There is a lot of bugs going about ATM.

Anyway back on topic. Watch any vt of the piece of pavement we are discussing, even the reconstruction in Madeleine Was Here, and you will see how impossible it would be for two individuals to be standing on it  and another to pass by without being seen.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Sorry I have been away so long.

Had a sudden onset of vomitting and d......, then a long several hour sleep.  Think I am OK again

 8(8-))
Wonder if it was the calling of a child, an item, that brought it on?  Only joking, but I am VERY upset that anyone would be so insensitive as to call Madeleine, any child, that.  It shows an attitude of mind .. and other things >@@(*&)


-------------------------------------------------------------------


Isabod, why haven't you read the thread?  Why haven't you read the width of the pavement there?

It was about 1.8 to 2.0 metres wide(at the corner as indicated on Jezes hand drawn map) so plenty of space even if they were both on the pavement > What's your problem?

Was it you that tried to make out that I had some agenda for wanting them to be on the eastern pavement. or was that someone else?


Wrong again 8(>((

No it wasn't me

I hope you are feeling better soon

Offline sadie

Thanks for your kind words faithlilly



How well were the hedges cut back at the timer of the videos?   Greenery grows like crazy in PT and it had just been cut back at the time of the abduction [see photos taken at the time]

And on his drawing, Jez clearly indicates that they were standing on the alleyway corner.  So easy to pass them there.

Offline sadie

Sorry I have been away so long.

Had a sudden onset of vomitting and d......, then a long several hour sleep.  Think I am OK again

 8(8-))
Wonder if it was the calling of a child, an item, that brought it on?  Only joking, but I am VERY upset that anyone would be so insensitive as to call Madeleine, any child, that.  It shows an attitude of mind .. and other things >@@(*&)


-------------------------------------------------------------------


Isabod, why haven't you read the thread?  Why haven't you read the width of the pavement there?

It was about 1.8 to 2.0 metres wide(at the corner as indicated on Jezes hand drawn map) so plenty of space even if they were both on the pavement > What's your problem?

Was it you that tried to make out that I had some agenda for wanting them to be on the eastern pavement. or was that someone else?


Wrong again 8(>((

No it wasn't me

I hope you are feeling better soon

Thankyou, Icabod ... probably OK now

Must have been someone else then that got it wrong.  maybe they will apologise?

All I am interested in is the truth.  Oh and supporting a family that have been sorely abused, mainly by peeps who just dont understand and have taken on board the lies put out about them in the early days.  Also have decided that they dont like Kate and Gerry.  Nor their perceived body language.

Strange thing is that these peeps fell for Karen Matthews spiel "hook, line and sinker"
The moment she opened her mouth I knew she was lying - yet all the [ censored word] were crowing that "that was the way that The mccanns should be behaving"

Jeez, would be funny if it weren't so sad .. causing so much damage to a lost childs search.

... And so much hurt.  8(8-))

Offline faithlilly

Thanks for your kind words faithlilly



How well were the hedges cut back at the timer of the videos?   Greenery grows like crazy in PT and it had just been cut back at the time of the abduction [see photos taken at the time]

And on his drawing, Jez clearly indicates that they were standing on the alleyway corner.  So easy to pass them there.

Jez's drawing differs from his statements. In one of his statement he says he was 5m from the alleyway.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

icabodcrane

  • Guest
This thread has been a work in progress  ...  well done,  and thanks to John,  for using debate and witness statements to bring us to what is probably the most definitive picture of the Tanner/McCann/Wilkins   'crossing'  as we are likely to get

What conclusions can we draw now  ...  looking at that final picture ...  about the likelihood of Jane Tanner passing by unseen   ?

C.Edwards

  • Guest
If Gerry and Jez were pretty much outside the gate on the path then a ninja would have struggled to get by unseen, let alone a substantial woman dressed in purple wearing flip flops!

Offline faithlilly

If Gerry and Jez were pretty much outside the gate on the path then a ninja would have struggled to get by unseen, let alone a substantial woman dressed in purple wearing flip flops!

Nail on the head !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Admin

Interesting video which was posted earlier this evening where Jane Tanner explains how she slipped past Jeremy and Gerry as they had a natter at the side of the road.  You will have noticed that she was on the road when she was pointing out to Gerry where he was stood.  That must have really pissed him off!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na4aBr5PTYY&feature=youtube_gdata_player


In any event they both could have been stood there on the pavement and still left plenty of room for passers-by as gentlemen do.

Offline sadie

Thanks for your kind words faithlilly



How well were the hedges cut back at the timer of the videos?   Greenery grows like crazy in PT and it had just been cut back at the time of the abduction [see photos taken at the time]

And on his drawing, Jez clearly indicates that they were standing on the alleyway corner.  So easy to pass them there.

Jez's drawing differs from his statements. In one of his statement he says he was 5m from the alleyway.

In which direction Faithlilly?  North south or E., in the middle of the road?  Dont forget that in your quote, he also says that he was 10 -15 metres from the top of the road, when he was more like 30 metres away. 

With such inaccuracy, I prefer his drawing.  That is very definite.

It says they were on the corner of the alleyway



Are you all trying to disprove my theory?  Too close for comfort, is it?

Offline Admin

Even in Gerry's alternative scenario he is stood on the road looking up at the 6' and more Jeremy standing on the pavement.   Does anyone think that one of them had a similar encounter at a different time and quiet possibly they are mixing them up?  Just a thought.

I like this particular mock up, it has a ring of truth about it when you consider what Jeremy said in his statements and what Mss Tanner pointed on in the mock reconstruction.   Jeremy claims it happened right there on the pathway so had he two feet on the kerb or just one?   8(0(*



« Last Edit: April 21, 2014, 06:35:56 PM by John »