Author Topic: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?  (Read 60444 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Benice

Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #105 on: April 26, 2013, 12:47:15 AM »
Here is the complete report of Kate McCann ("Madeleine") of the"regular informal meeting". We were taken to an upstairs room at the police station where we were greeted by Luís Neves and Guilhermino Encarnação. Our interpreter this time was a police officer, not Proconsul Angela Morado, as was usually the case. The whole demeanour of Neves and Encarnação was different. They looked serious and cold.
There had been a ‘shift’ in the investigation, they said. They had always been optimistic that Madeleine was alive, but now things had changed. Almost instantaneously I could feel my breathing pattern altering and that familiar constriction in my throat. Gerry asked if any evidence had come to light to suggest that Madeleine was dead but they wouldn’t reply. There was a lot of frowning going on which, combined with the language barrier, made it less obvious that they weren’t answering us. Gerry was then asked to leave the room. Now the sirens in my head were deafening. I was on my own and afraid. Please God, let my Madeleine be OK.
Tell us about that night, they said.Tell us everything that happened after the children went to bed. I gave them every detail I could remember, as I had before, but this time they responded by just staring at me and shaking their heads. I was reeling with confusion, disbelief and panic. What the hell was going on? Evidently not satisfied with my account, they pressed me. Was there anything else I wanted to add? Anything else unusual that had occurred that night?
Of course there wasn’t. If there had been I would have told them on 3 May. I’d recounted absolutely everything and anything – more than they wanted or needed to know, probably, just in case some triviality I recalled might be significant. How could they think I would hold something back that might help my daughter? Why were they asking me this? Why?
Neves stated bluntly that they didn’t believe my version of events. It ‘didn’t fit’ with what they knew. Didn’t fit? What did they know? I was sobbing now, well past the stage of silent tears and stifled sniffs. I began to wail hysterically, drawing breath in desperate gasps.
Why did I think Madeleine had been alive when she was taken from the apartment? they persisted. I explained between sobs that there had been nothing to suggest otherwise; no indication that she might have come to harm. Had I ever considered that she may be dead? Yes, of course. Early on that was all I thought, all the time: that some paedophile had grabbed her, abused her and later killed her. Then I’d begun to wonder if she was being held by pornographers, I told them, or had been taken for someone who wanted a child.
I was becoming more and more distressed and more and more scared. I wanted Gerry. Still they pushed me. They proposed that when I’d put Madeleine to bed that night, it wasn’t actually the last time I’d seen her. But it was. It was! I felt I was being bullied, and I suppose I was. I assume these tactics were deliberate: knock her off balance by telling her that her daughter is dead and get her to confess. Because I was in no doubt now that they were trying to make me say I’d killed Madeleine or knew what had happened to her. I might be naive but I’m not stupid.
On and on it went. They tried to convince me I’d had a blackout – a ‘loss of memory episode’, I think they called it. My denials, answers and pleas fell on deaf ears. This was their theory and they wanted to shoehorn me into it, end of story. At last they seemed to decide that the interview was over. They told me I could ring them any time, day or night, to give them the information they were waiting for.
I was allowed to spend a couple of minutes with Gerry, but I don’t think he was able to get much sense out of me. Then it was his turn to be interrogated. He managed to remain a little calmer than I had but he was still visibly upset and shaken afterwards. He gave the police his account of the events of 3 May and the reasons why he didn’t believe Madeleine had been killed in the apartment. Through his tears he pleaded with the two men: ‘Do you have evidence that Madeleine is dead? We’re her parents. You have to tell us.’
‘It’s coming,’ Neves told him. ‘It’s coming!’
Outside the room, I was praying – begging prayers. I was beginning to come unstuck. But if I thought the police had finished with me, I was mistaken. Before long I was ordered back into the room to join Gerry for round three.
Once again Gerry wanted to know if the case had now become a murder inquiry. The answer was indirect: ‘You can probably guess that from our lack of response.’ In a slightly threatening manner, Luís asked why I wasn’t looking him straight in the eye. There was no reason, other than that I was incapable of looking at anyone properly: my own eyes were so swollen and sore that I was struggling to keep them from closing completely. Finally, Gerry tried to establish when – and if – we would be having another meeting with them. ‘The next time we meet it will be across the table.’ The message behind this rather Delphic statement was clear: there would be no more informal meetings.

Secret of Justice was running, that's true..
Why is there nothing in the files ?

The McCanns had no power over what was in the files.   The meeting was informal - so I presume no record was made of it.   Have any of the named persons above complained that Kate's description was not true?  Just curious

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

registrar

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #106 on: April 26, 2013, 12:48:04 AM »
not your life - just the last two months

as for nasty

I reserve that for the real baddies

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #107 on: April 26, 2013, 12:51:51 AM »
Here is the complete report of Kate McCann ("Madeleine") of the"regular informal meeting". We were taken to an upstairs room at the police station where we were greeted by Luís Neves and Guilhermino Encarnação. Our interpreter this time was a police officer, not Proconsul Angela Morado, as was usually the case. The whole demeanour of Neves and Encarnação was different. They looked serious and cold.
There had been a ‘shift’ in the investigation, they said. They had always been optimistic that Madeleine was alive, but now things had changed. Almost instantaneously I could feel my breathing pattern altering and that familiar constriction in my throat. Gerry asked if any evidence had come to light to suggest that Madeleine was dead but they wouldn’t reply. There was a lot of frowning going on which, combined with the language barrier, made it less obvious that they weren’t answering us. Gerry was then asked to leave the room. Now the sirens in my head were deafening. I was on my own and afraid. Please God, let my Madeleine be OK.
Tell us about that night, they said.Tell us everything that happened after the children went to bed. I gave them every detail I could remember, as I had before, but this time they responded by just staring at me and shaking their heads. I was reeling with confusion, disbelief and panic. What the hell was going on? Evidently not satisfied with my account, they pressed me. Was there anything else I wanted to add? Anything else unusual that had occurred that night?
Of course there wasn’t. If there had been I would have told them on 3 May. I’d recounted absolutely everything and anything – more than they wanted or needed to know, probably, just in case some triviality I recalled might be significant. How could they think I would hold something back that might help my daughter? Why were they asking me this? Why?
Neves stated bluntly that they didn’t believe my version of events. It ‘didn’t fit’ with what they knew. Didn’t fit? What did they know? I was sobbing now, well past the stage of silent tears and stifled sniffs. I began to wail hysterically, drawing breath in desperate gasps.
Why did I think Madeleine had been alive when she was taken from the apartment? they persisted. I explained between sobs that there had been nothing to suggest otherwise; no indication that she might have come to harm. Had I ever considered that she may be dead? Yes, of course. Early on that was all I thought, all the time: that some paedophile had grabbed her, abused her and later killed her. Then I’d begun to wonder if she was being held by pornographers, I told them, or had been taken for someone who wanted a child.
I was becoming more and more distressed and more and more scared. I wanted Gerry. Still they pushed me. They proposed that when I’d put Madeleine to bed that night, it wasn’t actually the last time I’d seen her. But it was. It was! I felt I was being bullied, and I suppose I was. I assume these tactics were deliberate: knock her off balance by telling her that her daughter is dead and get her to confess. Because I was in no doubt now that they were trying to make me say I’d killed Madeleine or knew what had happened to her. I might be naive but I’m not stupid.
On and on it went. They tried to convince me I’d had a blackout – a ‘loss of memory episode’, I think they called it. My denials, answers and pleas fell on deaf ears. This was their theory and they wanted to shoehorn me into it, end of story. At last they seemed to decide that the interview was over. They told me I could ring them any time, day or night, to give them the information they were waiting for.
I was allowed to spend a couple of minutes with Gerry, but I don’t think he was able to get much sense out of me. Then it was his turn to be interrogated. He managed to remain a little calmer than I had but he was still visibly upset and shaken afterwards. He gave the police his account of the events of 3 May and the reasons why he didn’t believe Madeleine had been killed in the apartment. Through his tears he pleaded with the two men: ‘Do you have evidence that Madeleine is dead? We’re her parents. You have to tell us.’
‘It’s coming,’ Neves told him. ‘It’s coming!’
Outside the room, I was praying – begging prayers. I was beginning to come unstuck. But if I thought the police had finished with me, I was mistaken. Before long I was ordered back into the room to join Gerry for round three.
Once again Gerry wanted to know if the case had now become a murder inquiry. The answer was indirect: ‘You can probably guess that from our lack of response.’ In a slightly threatening manner, Luís asked why I wasn’t looking him straight in the eye. There was no reason, other than that I was incapable of looking at anyone properly: my own eyes were so swollen and sore that I was struggling to keep them from closing completely. Finally, Gerry tried to establish when – and if – we would be having another meeting with them. ‘The next time we meet it will be across the table.’ The message behind this rather Delphic statement was clear: there would be no more informal meetings.

Secret of Justice was running, that's true..
Why is there nothing in the files ?

The McCanns had no power over what was in the files.   The meeting was informal - so I presume no record was made of it.   Have any of the named persons above complained that Kate's description was not true?  Just curious

I believe Kate's claim that the police offered her a  'deal'  was rebutted at some point  (  by her lawyer ?  ) ...  it was explained  as a misunderstanding if I recall correctly

I have no evidence for that recollection

registrar

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #108 on: April 26, 2013, 12:52:25 AM »
Who has sued the McCanns for slander or libel??

We know who sued and won against:

various British newspapers

Amaral

Bennett

who went legal against the McCanns????

If not, why not???
« Last Edit: April 26, 2013, 12:53:56 AM by registrar »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #109 on: April 26, 2013, 12:52:36 AM »
Ok, I'll be the first one to respond.

She didn't answer because she was afraid that if she told the truth she would implicate herself and if lying she could be judged for perjury.

But what answer could implicate this mother of a disappeared child? That's what we cannot understand if she is totally innocent of any wrongdoing.


Admin note:
She wasn't under oath so she couldn't have been prosecuted for perjury.

This is not Common Law here, John, no oath, no bible, hence no perjury.

How about perverting the course of justice ?
This of course is a crime in itself.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #110 on: April 26, 2013, 12:55:00 AM »
Who has sued the McCanns for slander or libel??

We know who sued and won against:

various British newspapers

Amaral

Bennett

who went legal against the Mccanns????

If not, why not???

Should the McCanns lose their libel trial against Amaral  (  or withdraw )  I would think there is every possibility he will counter sue for damages caused

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #111 on: April 26, 2013, 01:00:38 AM »
Here is the complete report of Kate McCann ("Madeleine") of the"regular informal meeting". We were taken to an upstairs room at the police station where we were greeted by Luís Neves and Guilhermino Encarnação. Our interpreter this time was a police officer, not Proconsul Angela Morado, as was usually the case. The whole demeanour of Neves and Encarnação was different. They looked serious and cold.
There had been a ‘shift’ in the investigation, they said. They had always been optimistic that Madeleine was alive, but now things had changed. Almost instantaneously I could feel my breathing pattern altering and that familiar constriction in my throat. Gerry asked if any evidence had come to light to suggest that Madeleine was dead but they wouldn’t reply. There was a lot of frowning going on which, combined with the language barrier, made it less obvious that they weren’t answering us. Gerry was then asked to leave the room. Now the sirens in my head were deafening. I was on my own and afraid. Please God, let my Madeleine be OK.
Tell us about that night, they said.Tell us everything that happened after the children went to bed. I gave them every detail I could remember, as I had before, but this time they responded by just staring at me and shaking their heads. I was reeling with confusion, disbelief and panic. What the hell was going on? Evidently not satisfied with my account, they pressed me. Was there anything else I wanted to add? Anything else unusual that had occurred that night?
Of course there wasn’t. If there had been I would have told them on 3 May. I’d recounted absolutely everything and anything – more than they wanted or needed to know, probably, just in case some triviality I recalled might be significant. How could they think I would hold something back that might help my daughter? Why were they asking me this? Why?
Neves stated bluntly that they didn’t believe my version of events. It ‘didn’t fit’ with what they knew. Didn’t fit? What did they know? I was sobbing now, well past the stage of silent tears and stifled sniffs. I began to wail hysterically, drawing breath in desperate gasps.
Why did I think Madeleine had been alive when she was taken from the apartment? they persisted. I explained between sobs that there had been nothing to suggest otherwise; no indication that she might have come to harm. Had I ever considered that she may be dead? Yes, of course. Early on that was all I thought, all the time: that some paedophile had grabbed her, abused her and later killed her. Then I’d begun to wonder if she was being held by pornographers, I told them, or had been taken for someone who wanted a child.
I was becoming more and more distressed and more and more scared. I wanted Gerry. Still they pushed me. They proposed that when I’d put Madeleine to bed that night, it wasn’t actually the last time I’d seen her. But it was. It was! I felt I was being bullied, and I suppose I was. I assume these tactics were deliberate: knock her off balance by telling her that her daughter is dead and get her to confess. Because I was in no doubt now that they were trying to make me say I’d killed Madeleine or knew what had happened to her. I might be naive but I’m not stupid.
On and on it went. They tried to convince me I’d had a blackout – a ‘loss of memory episode’, I think they called it. My denials, answers and pleas fell on deaf ears. This was their theory and they wanted to shoehorn me into it, end of story. At last they seemed to decide that the interview was over. They told me I could ring them any time, day or night, to give them the information they were waiting for.
I was allowed to spend a couple of minutes with Gerry, but I don’t think he was able to get much sense out of me. Then it was his turn to be interrogated. He managed to remain a little calmer than I had but he was still visibly upset and shaken afterwards. He gave the police his account of the events of 3 May and the reasons why he didn’t believe Madeleine had been killed in the apartment. Through his tears he pleaded with the two men: ‘Do you have evidence that Madeleine is dead? We’re her parents. You have to tell us.’
‘It’s coming,’ Neves told him. ‘It’s coming!’
Outside the room, I was praying – begging prayers. I was beginning to come unstuck. But if I thought the police had finished with me, I was mistaken. Before long I was ordered back into the room to join Gerry for round three.
Once again Gerry wanted to know if the case had now become a murder inquiry. The answer was indirect: ‘You can probably guess that from our lack of response.’ In a slightly threatening manner, Luís asked why I wasn’t looking him straight in the eye. There was no reason, other than that I was incapable of looking at anyone properly: my own eyes were so swollen and sore that I was struggling to keep them from closing completely. Finally, Gerry tried to establish when – and if – we would be having another meeting with them. ‘The next time we meet it will be across the table.’ The message behind this rather Delphic statement was clear: there would be no more informal meetings.

Secret of Justice was running, that's true..
Why is there nothing in the files ?

The McCanns had no power over what was in the files.   The meeting was informal - so I presume no record was made of it.   Have any of the named persons above complained that Kate's description was not true?  Just curious

All manner of stuff doesn't appear in the files. 

We don't see Stuart Prior's report.

And while some will say that was in compliance with Leicestershire police's wishes, that won't do.

We don't see Lee Rainbow's report, either, and he worked for the same organisation as Harrison.

But we do see the reports of the liaison officers, who worked for Leicestershire police.

Work that out ...

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #112 on: April 26, 2013, 01:03:21 AM »


The McCanns had no power over what was in the files.   The meeting was informal - so I presume no record was made of it.   Have any of the named persons above complained that Kate's description was not true?  Just curious
An informal meeting became a tough interview. The PJ could very well have taken statements. Why didn't they ? Was it in order to avoid "self incrimination" ?
If we believe Kate McCann, then what happened on the 7th shouldn't have been a surprise for her.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #113 on: April 26, 2013, 01:09:50 AM »

I believe Kate's claim that the police offered her a  'deal'  was rebutted at some point  (  by her lawyer ?  ) ...  it was explained  as a misunderstanding if I recall correctly

I have no evidence for that recollection
This was in September, a misunderstanding explained the lawyer. Some confusion between Common Law (which allows plea bargain) and inquisitorial system (which doesn't).

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #114 on: April 26, 2013, 01:13:50 AM »

Offline muratfan

Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #115 on: April 26, 2013, 01:24:20 AM »
Who has sued the McCanns for slander or libel??

We know who sued and won against:

various British newspapers

Amaral

Bennett

who went legal against the Mccanns????

If not, why not???

Should the McCanns lose their libel trial against Amaral  (  or withdraw )  I would think there is every possibility he will counter sue for damages caused

Dream on

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #116 on: April 26, 2013, 05:46:09 AM »
The suggestion that Kate McCann was being  'framed'  by the police is quite a ridiculous one, to me

This case was being watched on rolling 24 hour news  ...  senior  politicians, including Prime Ministers were involved ... diplomats and seconded government officials were on hand ...  celebrities and millionaire backers were watching with interest  ...  the world's press were primed and ready to go at a moment's notice

This case  ...  of all cases ...  was at minimum risk of police wrong-doing

There is a difference between conscious framing and that of having a police mindset that allows an investigation to continue beyond the available evidence becasue it has assumed guilt. That is why they have cases screened by the Prosecutor in Portugal and by the CPS in the UK. In the bad old days the police used to prosecute in the UK and there were considerably more trials that failed to get a conviction because of such police mindsets.

Offline John

Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #117 on: April 26, 2013, 09:34:22 AM »
The Portuguese police failed the McCann's utterly and completely.  Their actions at that informal meeting detailed above is evidence if any is in fact needed that this was the case.  Same old story, fail to find the criminal perpetrators so blame the victim in order to cover their own backsides!

They are a disgrace to have put Kate and Gerry through such an ordeal.  Little wonder the McCann's decided to return home and effectively stop cooperating with such a bunch of keystone cops.  I have seen these Iberian incompetents at their very worst and I can empathise with the McCann's.  Had they not been non Portuguese nationals and had the investigation not been under world Press scrutiny I have no doubt that they would have been mentally and physically abused by their inquisitors.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Carana

Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #118 on: April 26, 2013, 09:43:38 AM »


All manner of stuff doesn't appear in the files. 

We don't see Stuart Prior's report.

And while some will say that was in compliance with Leicestershire police's wishes, that won't do.

We don't see Lee Rainbow's report, either, and he worked for the same organisation as Harrison.

But we do see the reports of the liaison officers, who worked for Leicestershire police.

Work that out ...

Well I see a difference - the FLOs made statements as part of the rogatory process.


Offline Carana

Re: Why didn't Kate McCann answer the questions of the PJ?
« Reply #119 on: April 26, 2013, 10:00:38 AM »
The Portuguese police failed the McCann's utterly and completely.  Their actions at that informal meeting detailed above is evidence if any is in fact needed that this was the case.  Same old story, fail to find the criminal perpetrators so blame the victim in order to cover their own backsides!

They are a disgrace to have put Kate and Gerry through such an ordeal.  Little wonder the McCann's decided to return home and effectively stop cooperating with such a bunch of keystone cops.  I have seen these Iberian incompetents at their very worst and I can empathise with the McCann's.  Had they not been non Portuguese nationals and had the investigation not been under world Press scrutiny I have no doubt that they would have been mentally and physically abused by their inquisitors.


Not all the Portuguese police - Rebelo's team tried to pick up the pieces as best they could. The DCCB seems competent. Major Sequiera's report is very touching in its description of the search for her.