Any dog owner knows that their dog would go and sniff and find a dead body or other unpalatable smells if they came across them
Why have cadaver dogs then if they are rubbish? Or highly unreliable as Gerry Mccann says. Why not use anyones dog? Why do police train them, use them, and other police forces who dont have them use them?
No-one is ridiculing them. We are merely pointing out knowledge that is available to decide whether or not they are accurate.
We do KNOW that cadaver dogs alert to blood alone when cadaver is absent completely.
Angelo related them to a circus act
What about all the times the dogs failed to detect anything when there was in fact something to find? Are these episodes classified as fools errands or are they conveniently overlooked? Let's face it a spaniel's hooter and what it can achieve is not an accurate science and more akin to a circus act.
***
As to whether they are accurate, this has been established, they are are accurate to a high percentage
IMO Edidie was very accurate in flat 5a,and seeing as no one is reported to have died there, I would like to know what he was alerting to and it is astronomically improbable or just *bad luck* that he was alerting to innocent things ONLY there and nowhere else, such as urine, semen, bad breath, sweat, toenails, rotting teeth, abortions and all the other things people he he could have been alerting to ONLY in a missing childs house but nowhere else, erm i rest my case there exactly for now