Author Topic: Did the PJ advise against releasing identifying features relating to Maddy?  (Read 31083 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Quote
So?its up to whoever said they were advised to cite this

does that imply that people are being told what to say on here?

No it doesnt, it means whoever says a certain thinghas to cite evidence, lol oh dear

excellent - we will await luz cite then

No, because luz didnt create the story, many other posters on here and elsewhere have said exactly the same, they might get their fingers out too to find the link, stop bullying

Redblossom

  • Guest
Soooo.

Without prolonging any arguments, do we agree that Amaral himself requested permission from the DA's office to publish details of the missing child, including the fleck in her eye on 4/5? And that the deputy DA gave permission on the same day?

what is a da office?

do you mean a DA office?

Da DA same thing, same letters same meaning no need to be peurile and pedantic
 8)--))

amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Quote
So?its up to whoever said they were advised to cite this

does that imply that people are being told what to say on here?

No it doesnt, it means whoever says a certain thinghas to cite evidence, lol oh dear

excellent - we will await luz cite then

No, because luz didnt create the story, many other posters on here and elsewhere have said exactly the same, they might get their fingers out too to find the link, stop bullying

Look at the opening post.

That post was taken from another thread on here.

Luz brought it here.

Offline Carana

Soooo.

Without prolonging any arguments, do we agree that Amaral himself requested permission from the DA's office to publish details of the missing child, including the fleck in her eye on 4/5? And that the deputy DA gave permission on the same day?

what is a da office?





do you mean a DA office?


The Deputy Prosecutor

Sandra Marques

Redblossom

  • Guest
The Deputy Prosecutor

Sandra Marques

---

Thanks, what did she say?

Offline Carana


Redblossom

  • Guest
The Deputy Prosecutor

Sandra Marques

---

Thanks, what did she say?

2 pages up.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1420.msg40736#msg40736

did she say publicise the eye defect?Cant see it

Offline Carana

The Deputy Prosecutor

Sandra Marques

---

Thanks, what did she say?

2 pages up.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1420.msg40736#msg40736

did she say publicise the eye defect?Cant see it


She apparently agreed to the content that GA had suggested. There's no documentation to suggest otherwise. The PJ press release contained this detail.

Redblossom

  • Guest
and? Carana