Author Topic: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry  (Read 10276 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

registrar

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #30 on: May 01, 2013, 04:05:07 PM »
btw it's faeces (British spelling)

or feces (US spelling)

you don't read many books I take it?



your post makes no sense - but this isn't the first time

.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 04:07:03 PM by registrar »

Offline Carana

Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #31 on: May 01, 2013, 04:40:41 PM »
Is it correct to state that dogs like the former Eddie will or should react to any human waste material regardless of whether it came from a live or a dead body?

So any poo left behind by children on an apartment floor will cause a reaction??

No idea. It may depend on whether the dog was desensitised or not and whether he was in focused work mode or not.

Eddie clearly reacted to the sex clean-up tissues in Jersey.

registrar

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #32 on: May 01, 2013, 04:42:58 PM »
Question to the McCann: why 'Team McCann' -  what's the wider issue?

Question to Amaral
: you gave Murat a hard time - you never spoke to G&K - WHY
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 04:46:57 PM by registrar »

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #33 on: May 01, 2013, 04:46:23 PM »
Is it correct to state that dogs like the former Eddie will or should react to any human waste material regardless of whether it came from a live or a dead body?

So any poo left behind by children on an apartment floor will cause a reaction??

No idea. It may depend on whether the dog was desensitised or not and whether he was in focused work mode or not.

Eddie clearly reacted to the sex clean-up tissues in Jersey.

Sec cleanup tissue have human profile breakdown odor- similar to human profile putrefaction odor.

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #34 on: May 02, 2013, 12:22:38 AM »
I'd like to ask Kate why she thought the brown stain she discovered on Madeleine's  pyjama top on Thursday morning  was relevent

She has mentioned it repeatedly, and also recounts it in her book

Why would,  what she assumed to be a simple tea stain,  be of concern to her since ?

What does she think the stain may have been that could be of such relevence that it bears repeating ?

I don't why that troubles me ...  but it does 

Offline Benice

Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #35 on: May 02, 2013, 08:02:50 AM »
I'd like to ask Kate why she thought the brown stain she discovered on Madeleine's  pyjama top on Thursday morning  was relevent

She has mentioned it repeatedly, and also recounts it in her book

Why would,  what she assumed to be a simple tea stain,  be of concern to her since ?

What does she think the stain may have been that could be of such relevence that it bears repeating ?

I don't why that troubles me ...  but it does



She's obviously given a lot of thought to that stain.  I think that's because she has not been able to establish exactly -  i.e. 100% -  in her mind what it was or how it got there.   In her circumstances you would go over and over anything - (no matter how small)  for which you were not able to find a reason which proved conclusively to yourself that it was an 'innocent' occurrence.   IMO




The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #36 on: May 02, 2013, 06:51:13 PM »
I'd like to ask Kate why she thought the brown stain she discovered on Madeleine's  pyjama top on Thursday morning  was relevent

She has mentioned it repeatedly, and also recounts it in her book

Why would,  what she assumed to be a simple tea stain,  be of concern to her since ?

What does she think the stain may have been that could be of such relevence that it bears repeating ?

I don't why that troubles me ...  but it does



She's obviously given a lot of thought to that stain.  I think that's because she has not been able to establish exactly -  i.e. 100% -  in her mind what it was or how it got there.   In her circumstances you would go over and over anything - (no matter how small)  for which you were not able to find a reason which proved conclusively to yourself that it was an 'innocent' occurrence.   IMO

I always got the feeling when Kate repeatedly mentioned  the 'brown stain'  that she noticed that morning,  she was implying it was was of significance

I know that the McCanns have suggested the abductor may have been in the apartment the night before  ( and had been the cause of Madeleine ans Sean waking and crying )  and I had the feeling that the  'brown stain'  was being tied in with that in some way

In what way though ?  ...  what does Kate think the stain was ?  ...  blood ?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Just one question to Goncalo or Kate and Gerry
« Reply #37 on: May 02, 2013, 06:58:45 PM »
Doubt it was blood. How could that be? Unless it was from a noseblood, which the Mccanns have said Madeleine did have, that might fit.

To relate it to a dry run abduction the night before, would suggest a use of drugging. Do any of these leave brown stains? Chloroform I thought was colourless? If a drug was used, then Madeleine wouldn't have woke up crying and the abductor would have been away with her? Pass.