The 'Hate' Question.

[Redblossom]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

[DCI]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

And where did the journo get it from? Duh!

[faithlilly]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

Interesting that supporters believe every word a journalist utters, unless it's against the McCanns.

[Redblossom]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

And where did journo get it from? Duh!

Did the police receive 18k for leaking it? Thats what you inferred.

[DCI]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

And where did journo get it from? Duh!

Did the police receive 18k for leaking it? Thats what you inferred.

Can't you ask them? The files hadn't been released, so how did the journo get his hands on it?
A Spanish journalist. Only the pj had it.

2. Was the copy NoW obtained in English or Portuguese?

The NoW copy was in Portuguese.

[Angelo222]

A Portuguese copper certainly leaked it but what he got in return will never be known.  It could have been Euros or a favour or both.  Bottom line is that it was a despicable disgusting thing to do. A proper piece of shit just like the journalist who sold it on!!

[AnneGuedes]

Why wasn't it investigated ? Before that it's just gossip that finally turns the PJ into a scapegoat. Could be counterproductive.

[DCI]

Why wasn't it investigated ? Before that it's just gossip that finally turns the PJ into a scapegoat. Could be counterproductive.

Better question Anne, who from the PJ, gave/sold it to the journo? Now that should be investgated.

Its a bit like those files supposedly left open on a PJ desk, that another journo got private information from, and rang all the numbers from phone records.

[Redblossom]

So it was sold by a journalist to the NOTW? Why did you say it was sold by the police then? leaking and selling are two different things. Leaks from police hapen in all countries.

And where did journo get it from? Duh!

Did the police receive 18k for leaking it? Thats what you inferred.

Can't you ask them? The files hadn't been released, so how did the journo get his hands on it?
A Spanish journalist. Only the pj had it.

2. Was the copy NoW obtained in English or Portuguese?

The NoW copy was in Portuguese.

Does it really matter anyway seeing as Km has published her diary/book now? And for more than 18 euros


And she got 125 thousand pounds from the NOTW for them alledgedly printing it without Mitchells permission when one editor said he was sure he had okd it
 >@@(*&)

Follow the money

[AnneGuedes]

Why wasn't it investigated ? Before that it's just gossip that finally turns the PJ into a scapegoat. Could be counterproductive.

Better question Anne, who from the PJ, gave/sold it to the journo? Now that should be investgated.

Its a bit like those files supposedly left open on a PJ desk, that another journo got private information from, and rang all the numbers from phone records.

I agree that should be investigated, DCI.
I find it fine the request (impressive lawyers !) to not include in the DVD the files on sexual predators that were exonerated after all (I only lament those files weren't sent to the PJ when Joana disappeared), but it seems to me this diary issue, inter alia, deserve to be cleared up, even if money seems to have resolved the issue.

[Mrs. B]

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/BIBLE.htm

4488  Dispatches 25-26 June 2008 re: photocopies of KMH diary and their destruction
17 Process Vol XVII Page 4488
17_VOLUME_XVIIa_Page_4488
 
Conclusion 26-06-2008

(Presents invoice)

The photocopies of the 'diary' do not contain any material of interest to the ongoing investigation, but relate to the personal and inviolable personal experiences of any person.

Accordingly I order the diary's respective destruction.

Portimao

2008-06-27

Pedro Frias
Criminal Instruction Judge

There shouldn't have been any copies of that diary left in the possession of the PJ as Judge Frias ordered them destroyed. Still, a Portuguese translation of them made it to the Portuguese press & was then sold on to News International.

[Mo Stache]

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/BIBLE.htm

4488  Dispatches 25-26 June 2008 re: photocopies of KMH diary and their destruction
17 Process Vol XVII Page 4488
17_VOLUME_XVIIa_Page_4488
 
Conclusion 26-06-2008

(Presents invoice)

The photocopies of the 'diary' do not contain any material of interest to the ongoing investigation, but relate to the personal and inviolable personal experiences of any person.

Accordingly I order the diary's respective destruction.

Portimao

2008-06-27

Pedro Frias
Criminal Instruction Judge

There shouldn't have been any copies of that diary left in the possession of the PJ as Judge Frias ordered them destroyed. Still, a Portuguese translation of them made it to the Portuguese press & was then sold on to News International.

Does that mean that Mr Amaral would also have been obliged to destroy his copy of the diary entries?   

[AnneGuedes]

Does that mean that Mr Amaral would also have been obliged to destroy his copy of the diary entries?

Why would he have a private copy of an uninteresting document ?

[Mo Stache]

Does that mean that Mr Amaral would also have been obliged to destroy his copy of the diary entries?

Why would he have a private copy of an uninteresting document ?

To use it in the research of or in the writing of his book on the case. Apparently the PJ, Mr Amaral and the journalist didn't find it "uninteresting" and they actually saw it as some sort of evidence of wrong doing on Kate McCann's part. 

[Mrs. B]

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/BIBLE.htm

4488  Dispatches 25-26 June 2008 re: photocopies of KMH diary and their destruction
17 Process Vol XVII Page 4488
17_VOLUME_XVIIa_Page_4488
 
Conclusion 26-06-2008

(Presents invoice)

The photocopies of the 'diary' do not contain any material of interest to the ongoing investigation, but relate to the personal and inviolable personal experiences of any person.

Accordingly I order the diary's respective destruction.

Portimao

2008-06-27

Pedro Frias
Criminal Instruction Judge

There shouldn't have been any copies of that diary left in the possession of the PJ as Judge Frias ordered them destroyed. Still, a Portuguese translation of them made it to the Portuguese press & was then sold on to News International.

Does that mean that Mr Amaral would also have been obliged to destroy his copy of the diary entries?

Mr. Amaral should never have had a copy of that diary at any point in time in his private possession. The diary was in the hands of the PJ & was their responsibility.