Is it true that the freelance journalist duarte levy

[ferryman]

Is it true that the freelance journalist duarte levy

Was employed by the pt police to video the british dog searches?

No.

Next?

[DCI]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

[ferryman]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

Good point ...

[Redblossom]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

Cite pls, thanks

[DCI]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

Cite pls, thanks

My pleasure.

25 February 2008
 Yorkshire Post

http://eddieandkeela.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/canine-experts-at-centre-of-jersey-body.html

[Redblossom]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

Cite pls, thanks

My pleasure.

25 February 2008
 Yorkshire Post

http://eddieandkeela.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/canine-experts-at-centre-of-jersey-body.html

Where does it say there Mr Grime showed his work in PDL?

[DCI]

What was Grime doing, using the video's to sell the dogs. BEFORE the files were released 

Cite pls, thanks

My pleasure.

25 February 2008
 Yorkshire Post

http://eddieandkeela.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/canine-experts-at-centre-of-jersey-body.html

Where does it say there Mr Grime showed his work in PDL?

Bungled Jersey child abuse probe branded a '£20million shambles'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217863/Bungled-Jersey-child-abuse-probe-branded-20million-shambles.html#ixzz2U3Mn84pu

'Grime made a presentation, showing him [Harper] a video of the dog finding the "scent of death" in Kate and Gerry McCann's car,' the detective said.

[Redblossom]

When did mr grime make the presentation?

Ah the Mail, bastion of truth, NOT, if I were you I really wouldnt use ANY tabloid as proof of ANYTHING

mr Harper himself said he was dubious about these dogs but was well impressed after they were deployed, he was one police chief  who was told to shut up...the shambles in Jersey were about a cover up, shameful shameless lot, have you not learnt anything in recent times?

The only shambles involve papers like the sun and the mail


DO ask yourself one SINGLE question, if you ever do, nowhere in the history of these dogs and handler  have they ever been attacked except for the MCAANN case and the JERSEY case, never before and never after, that should tell you both were likely a cover up and this country has seen MANY of them


Nite nite Late night viewing for you



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--J4GHI62KIE/TVBC9cPTf3I/AAAAAAAAAek/84dnPB1x_Vs/s1600/lennyharperG_228x300.jpg

[DCI]

You just keep telling yourself, what you want to hear.
You ask for proof then still deny it. Never mind  8-)(--)

[Redblossom]

You just keep telling yourself, what you want to hear.
You ask for proof then still deny it. Never mind  8-)(--)

you have not provided proof of anything at all, so keep your crazy smileys for yourself basically until you can provide  any, cheers big ears

[Chinagirl]

There are two issues here:

1.  Duarte Levy's claim to copyright of the video (no right the this claim if he didn't make the video himself)

2.  The release of the video before the case had been shelved and the files released (seems that he did - in much the same way that Amaral so obviously had access to the files before their release in order to write his book)

[Redblossom]

There are two issues here:

1.  Duarte Levy's claim to copyright of the video (no right the this claim if he didn't make the video himself)

2.  The release of the video before the case had been shelved and the files released (seems that he did - in much the same way that Amaral so obviously had access to the files before their release in order to write his book)

do provide the proof then chinagirl of DL being guilty of 2

No 1 is negligible and no one cares , well, apart from you, FM et al

[Chinagirl]

There are two issues here:

1.  Duarte Levy's claim to copyright of the video (no right the this claim if he didn't make the video himself)

2.  The release of the video before the case had been shelved and the files released (seems that he did - in much the same way that Amaral so obviously had access to the files before their release in order to write his book)

do provide the proof then chinagirl of DL being guilty of 2

No 1 is negligible and no one cares , well, apart from you, FM et al

See DCI's post above.

[Redblossom]

There are two issues here:

1.  Duarte Levy's claim to copyright of the video (no right the this claim if he didn't make the video himself)

2.  The release of the video before the case had been shelved and the files released (seems that he did - in much the same way that Amaral so obviously had access to the files before their release in order to write his book)

do provide the proof then chinagirl of DL being guilty of 2

No 1 is negligible and no one cares , well, apart from you, FM et al

See DCI's post above.

Is that a joke? Lol

do quote it if not

[Chinagirl]

Why should DCI's post be a joke?