The truth about the failed marking of cuddle cat by cadaver dog Eddie

[Mr Gray]

OK the Mccanns hid their left over  pork in their wardrobe, great stuff...case closed......
 

wonder if they Pricked them before they cooked them.....and stored them in with their clothes LOL


as I said peurile, nonsensical, facts are different, you carry on dissing the dogs, you like everyone else who has even tried has failed  miserably....and you know  the answer why....dont you? Because they are a thorn in your  side
 

 
You cant explain why they alerted therefore it remains up in the air................

 Of course I can explain why they alerted...cross contamination from the Portuguese police

[Redblossom]

isn't that one too many arounds

You might find goingto bed and reading your thesaurus more interesting than me, so off you go...have fun x

[Redblossom]

Of course I can explain why they alerted...cross contamination from the Portuguese police

Your explanation is speculation and wishful thnking and nothing else.....no "real" explanation or proof.......keep on trying though

[pegasus]

Only eddie was sniffing around alot around the area of the bin beforehand......more so than anywhere else......

Yes, good point, but Eddie does not bark at the toy IMO.

BTW Eddie also sniffs at base of more than one door-window but the video shows no garden search.

[Redblossom]

Yes, good point, but Eddie does not bark at the toy IMO.

BTW Eddie also sniffs at base of more than one door-window but the video shows no garden search.

Sorry, I didnt understand that.....your second sentence


re the toy why sniff around it at all or the basket it was in or take it out? As opposed to other toys in the room

eta
He only barks when hes SURE

[Mr Gray]

You might find goingto bed and reading your thesaurus more interesting than me, so off you go...have fun x

As it appears posters only want correct English on this site...shouldn't you have said than "I"..you may be claiming "than" as a preposition and claim the objective pronoun after is just fine...common usage is on your side but grammatically you are incorrect..

[Mr Gray]

Your explanation is speculation and wishful thnking and nothing else.....no "real" explanation or proof.......keep on trying though

 You mean its like my thesis...a bit like the book amaral wrote with the support of the pj but with no evidence to back it up..yeah..see what you mean

[pegasus]

Sorry, I didnt understand that.....your second sentence


re the toy why sniff around it at all or the basket it was in or take it out? As opposed to other toys in the room

eta
He only barks when hes SURE

IMO at some places in the house there may be thousands of compounds for the dog to sniff and eliminate, so just because he spends a slightly longer time, for example, around that plastic bin, or around the base of a patio door, or anywhere else, does not mean there is any detection of the scent he seeks there, IMO.

[Redblossom]

As it appears posters only want correct English on this site...shouldn't you have said than "I"..you may be claiming "than" as a preposition and claim the objective pronoun after is just fine...common usage is on your side but grammatically you are incorrect..

thats why i told you to read the thesaurus, obviously that or the dictionary or the yellow pages excites you, more than facts and reality,and ideas thatcadaver dogs react to lamp chops in peoples wardrobes etc.... have fun....sleep well

[Redblossom]

IMO at some places in the house there may be thousands of compounds for the dog to sniff and eliminate, so just because he spends a slightly longer time, for example, around that plastic bin, or around the base of a patio door, or anywhere else, does not mean there is any detection of the scent he seeks there, IMO.

Oh I see what you mean but he is not trained to sniff any or all of a  thousands of any compounds but a specific mix of certain ones....

ok so youthink he knocked the bin over by mistake, fair enough.....on the back burner.....I still cant fathom how you can see the childs t shirt in that photo

[pegasus]

Oh I see what you mean but he is not trained to sniff any or all of a  thousands of any compounds but a specific mix of certain ones....

ok so youthink he knocked the bin over by mistake, fair enough.....on the back burner.....I still cant fathom how you can see the childs t shirt in that photo

Its the only logical solution.
What Eddie signals in the villa video must be the same items as what he signals in the clothing video later that day.

[pegasus]

Tiny things can make the difference between accurate investion and miscarraige of investigation.
On the basis that Eddie signalled the toy, KM was effectively accused of lying when she said the toy was on the bed when she looked in the room.
As it turns out, IMO Eddie did not signal the toy, as anyone can see in the video, he signalled accurately something on top of the cupboard.
This makes a huge difference because it means that implied accusation against her was completely false.

[Redblossom]

Its the only logical solution.
What Eddie signals in the villa video must be the same items as what he signals in the clothing video later that day.

Only if the red t shirt the gingham pants and white blouse were in that pile

[Redblossom]

Tiny things can make the difference between accurate investion and miscarraige of investigation.
On the basis that Eddie signalled the toy, KM was effectively accused of lying when she said the toy was on the bed when she looked in the room.

Why?

Oh scrap that......I see, the dog would have alerted in the kids bedroom?

[pegasus]

Only if the red t shirt the gingham pants and white blouse were in that pile

Those three items were afterwards taken away IIRC in the box labelled "living area" (maybe I am wrong?)
So where are those 3 items in the villa video of the living area?
IMO a small red t-shirt and a white top are in that pile.
You can even see a white detail IMO on the red item, and this fits the white plane of the design.