Do The McCanns Trust Operation Grange to Do the Job ?

[Mrs. B]

Why do McCann "sceptics" think that Redwood's pronouncement that Madeleine could be alive or dead somehow supports their argument that she was not abducted?

No, it's most odd. See the above link to the Met's own Youtube channel. Redwood says they initially had two lines of inquiry, but as they were progressing NEW EVIDENCE came to light that pointed to the possibility that Madeleine may be alive & that she had been taken in a criminal act by a stranger.

[amaraltheofficeboy]

Why do McCann "sceptics" think that Redwood's pronouncement that Madeleine could be alive or dead somehow supports their argument that she was not abducted?

They dont most intelligent people think redwood is a wimp and a nonsense and if he is not he has been mase to axt like one, come on, he wa ooozing get me ouy of here, easy to see poor bloke

spell check not working right tonight red?

[Mrs. B]

They get easily confused, half of the time Redwood is a wimp who doesn't know what he's talking about, the rest of the time they claim he is with them & secretly agrees that the McCann are 100% guilty & is only is making fake public statements to lure the McCann into a trap. They just can't get it straight.

[Chinagirl]

Why do McCann "sceptics" think that Redwood's pronouncement that Madeleine could be alive or dead somehow supports their argument that she was not abducted?

They dont most intelligent people think redwood is a wimp and a nonsense and if he is not he has been mase to axt like one, come on, he wa ooozing get me ouy of here, easy to see poor bloke

Good grief .....

[DCI]

It is also incorrect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e7h1XXNe0U

This is the OFFICIAL YT Channel of the Met Police.

I had forgotten about that one Mrs B, thanks 

Interesting, to listen to his exact words.

[faithlilly]

It is also incorrect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e7h1XXNe0U

This is the OFFICIAL YT Channel of the Met Police.

I had forgotten about that one Mrs B, thanks 

Interesting, to listen to his exact words.

It is DCI. 195 investigative opportunities and a year later still no nearer to finding Madeleine but hey, never mind, she may be alive so that puts the McCanns in the clear eh !

[gilet]

It is also incorrect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e7h1XXNe0U

This is the OFFICIAL YT Channel of the Met Police.

I had forgotten about that one Mrs B, thanks 

Interesting, to listen to his exact words.

It is DCI. 195 investigative opportunities and a year later still no nearer to finding Madeleine but hey, never mind, she may be alive so that puts the McCanns in the clear eh !

Actually it is the fact that there is no evidence of any crime by the McCanns that puts them in the clear. If you had bothered to read the Attorney General's Archive dispatch you would have spotted that little fact.

[Carana]

It is DCI. 195 investigative opportunities and a year later still no nearer to finding Madeleine but hey, never mind, she may be alive so that puts the McCanns in the clear eh !

That was when he estimated that they were 1/4 through the analysis. Some may have been checked out and dismissed, others may have arisen since.

[amaraltheofficeboy]

Faithlilly
so that puts the McCanns in the clear eh

big problem for you isn't it?

[faithlilly]

Actually it is the fact that there is no evidence of any crime by the McCanns that puts them in the clear. If you had bothered to read the Attorney General's Archive dispatch you would have spotted that little fact.

The AG also said the McCanns had lied about how often they checked on their children and that, by not taking part in he reconstruction, they had also failed to prove their innocence. Do you also agree with him on these points ?

[amaraltheofficeboy]

failed to prove their innocence.

of dear dear dear dear dear.

What a strange world some people live in

[faithlilly]

failed to prove their innocence.

of dear dear dear dear dear.

What a strange world some people live in

Please explain ?

[amaraltheofficeboy]

failed to prove their innocence.

of dear dear dear dear dear.

What a strange world some people live in

Please explain ?

watch my lips very very carefully - people do not have to prove their innocence.

(and I don't care who says they have to - it is wrong)

[gilet]

The AG also said the McCanns had lied about how often they checked on their children and that, by not taking part in he reconstruction, they had also failed to prove their innocence. Do you also agree with him on these points ?

Your understanding of law is pitiful. It is not the role of anyone to prove their own innocence. Perhaps you should get a basic primer and do a bit of studying?

I wasn't aware that the AG had stated that the McCanns were liars. Please offer us the quotation that shows this.

[debunker]

Cite for the AG saying that the McCanns or Tapas had lied please.