Author Topic: After the Smiths sighting - Where could this mystery man have gone? Land or Sea?  (Read 30321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
What are you referring to?
2 months and a cadaver dog (I suppose the murderer confessed where he had disposed of the body)
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2010/aug/05/body-of-pregnant-teen-found-in-calif-landfill/all/?print
« Last Edit: June 09, 2013, 05:52:35 PM by AnneGuedes »

Offline Lace

The point I am making is this.

If Madeleine died from an accident in the apartment.   It would have been very easy for the McCann's to say either that she climbed on the sofa when they were there before they went out,  or that she must have fallen during the night.

The reason that some say they had to dispose of her body is that they had over dosed her with drugs or had done something else to her which would be found out if they didn't hide the body.

So to say that they would just put her in a bin,  which is the place most people would look,  and risk her being found,   is something I just can't believe happened.

Offline faithlilly

2 months and a cadaver dog (I suppose the murdered confessed where he had disposed of the body)
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2010/aug/05/body-of-pregnant-teen-found-in-calif-landfill/all/?print

I believe Eugene Zapata also, eventually, confessed to disposing of his wife's body parts in landfill. Her body has never been found.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
I believe Eugene Zapata also, eventually, confessed to disposing of his wife's body parts in landfill. Her body has never been found.
Have you an idea of the cost of such a search ? All sorts of machines and devices have to be used.There's another case where numbers were given, I'll try to find it.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
The point I am making is this.

If Madeleine died from an accident in the apartment.   It would have been very easy for the McCann's to say either that she climbed on the sofa when they were there before they went out,  or that she must have fallen during the night.

The reason that some say they had to dispose of her body is that they had over dosed her with drugs or had done something else to her which would be found out if they didn't hide the body.

So to say that they would just put her in a bin,  which is the place most people would look,  and risk her being found,   is something I just can't believe happened.
I really don't think that anything could have been "very easy". It is hypothetical but not fictional.

Offline Lace

I really don't think that anything could have been "very easy". It is hypothetical but not fictional.


I shall word it another way then.

It would not be 'impossible'.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Not impossible, that's right. Certainly emotionally very distressing.

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
No. Those are closed sites. Special trucks go there. Between the collection and the deposit, there's processing.
Now if someone is buried in the country side, wild animals are a risk.

So Gerry couldn't have taken a fridge freezer to one of these sites?
Like we were led to believe in 2007.
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Lace

Not impossible, that's right. Certainly emotionally very distressing.


Oh definitely I agree.

That is another reason why I think the McCann's are innocent of hiding Madeleine's body.   How could they carry on eating dinner,  laughing and joking after doing so?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest

Oh definitely I agree.

That is another reason why I think the McCann's are innocent of hiding Madeleine's body.   How could they carry on eating dinner,  laughing and joking after doing so?
The poet says human kind cannot bear too much reality.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Was the possiblity of Madeleine being taken away by boat ever investigated by the Pj ?  I've personally haven't found any witness statements from the people whose boat the children were taken to in a dingy by the nannies. 

IIRC The man seen by the Smith was heading towards the beach.

PJ had in informal  interviews with the two sailing instructors and found nothng to take up any further


instructors  working for mark warners giving kids a fun day out on little yellow boats are suspects? i mean, is there anyone here who ISNT a SUSPECT? i mean really....who is NOT suspect in team mccanns views?
 8-)(--)
After a while it gets preposterous but then again thats the only thing this case has become once team mccann stuck their paws into it


SY will be havihg a very hard time, best thing redwood can do is chuck ALL metodos files in the incinerator pdq otherwise he and his employees will be up more garden paths than the whole of them have had hot dinners, that will be about 12m quid and another 3 years, but Im sure they are not STUPID, they should aldo investigate kennedy and his interference here withM3 
 8((()*/

« Last Edit: June 09, 2013, 07:44:21 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Benice

PJ had in informal  interviews with the two sailing instructors and found nothng to take up any further


instructors  working for mark warners giving kids a fun day out on little yellow boats are suspects? i mean, is there anyone here who ISNT a SUSPECT? i mean really....who is NOT suspect in team mccanns views?
 8-)(--)
After a while it gets preposterous but then again thats the only thing this case has become once team mccann stuck their paws into it


SY will be havihg a very hard time, best thing redwood can do is chuck ALL metodos files in the incinerator pdq otherwise he and his employees will be up more garden paths than the whole of them have had hot dinners, that will be about 12m quid and another 3 years, but Im sure they are not STUPID, they should aldo investigate kennedy and his interference here withM3 
 8((()*/

I have never made any such claim.    Nowhere did I say or even hint that Mark Warner employees should be suspects.   I said I had never seen any witness statements from the people whose boat the children were taken to.    I went on to make the point that it was possible to get out to sea from PdL beach.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Redblossom

  • Guest
I have never made any such claim.    Nowhere did I say or even hint that Mark Warner employees should be suspects.   I said I had never seen any witness statements from the people whose boat the children were taken to.    I went on to make the point that it was possible to get out to sea from PdL beach.

The dingies and sailing boat kids were taken out on belonged to mark warners, not some lurking paedo abductor murderer

AND the FACT remains that a few people ,including KM with her stupid insinuations, in her book, who here speculate that everyone and anyone  in PDL could be suspect, thats  totally unrealistic and thats not including the scores OUTSIDE PDL who are also potential suspects, as promulgated by the stupid british media, imo its pathetic

how about you swing it, and point to evidence that the mccanns could NOT have been  responsible, as the LP said, there is nothing in the files that eliminates them
« Last Edit: June 09, 2013, 08:10:58 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Benice

The dingies and sailing boat kids were taken out on belonged to mark warners, not some lurking paedo abductor murderer

AND the FACT remains that a few people ,including KM with her stupid insinuations, in her book, who here speculate that everyone and anyone  in PDL could be suspect, thats  totally unrealistic and thats not including the scores OUTSIDE PDL who are also potential suspects, as promulgated by the stupid british media, imo its pathetic

how about you swing it, and point to evidence that the mccanns could NOT have been  responsible, as the LP said, there is nothing in the files that eliminates them


Once again you are trying to put your words into my mouth.   As far as I was aware the people who took the children out on boats were employed by Mark Warner, and I merely stated that I had not seen any statements from those people.   If they were used to sailing around in that area, then they might have noticed any boats they had not seen before.

If you are so certain that the McCanns 'dunnit' then why don't give us your theory.  In six years not one 'sceptic' has ever been able to come up with one that can remotely be considered as credible.





 

 
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Redblossom

  • Guest

Once again you are trying to put your words into my mouth.   As far as I was aware the people who took the children out on boats were employed by Mark Warner, and I merely stated that I had not seen any statements from those people.   If they were used to sailing around in that area, then they might have noticed any boats they had not seen before.

If you are so certain that the McCanns 'dunnit' then why don't give us your theory.  In six years not one 'sceptic' has ever been able to come up with one that can remotely be considered as credible.





 

no your post specificlly asked about a person whose boat the children were taken to, there is no such person

***
I said I had never seen any witness statements from the people whose boat the children were taken to. 

***


oh PS I never said they *dun it* I say I do not believe them,they may have done it or  ie covered some accident up, they are LYING about something, I find them deceiptful, thatis 100% true and corredt for me, no doubt whatsoever,and I dont have to have a theory of what happened to suspect them its my right to, its called freedom of thought, thank god thatis still allowed
 8((()*/
« Last Edit: June 09, 2013, 09:05:20 PM by Redblossom »