Author Topic: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.  (Read 67402 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #60 on: June 26, 2013, 11:54:58 PM »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #61 on: June 26, 2013, 11:57:09 PM »
Total fantasies, do you lot never realise how utterly insane your theories are?

WHERE is the DISUSED building en route to beach (in a HOLIDAY resort)? How did Gerry McCann know about it? How did Gerry McCann know when the bins were going to be emptied? How did they retrieve the body when the police were already in place & setting up in the OC garden with loads of people running around looking everywhere.

On top of that, you think that a whole group of people (some who hardly even knew the McCanns) were happy to be in on a massive conspiracy theory to cover up the death of a child?

How did the "body" get into the car three weeks later?

Obviously you have never been to PDL. As sadie will confirm if you turn right from the location of the Smith sighting and carry on up the hill on the way back to the OC there are several dilapidated buildings which would make an excellent hiding place and there are also several large bins.

As to Gerry knowing about the emptying times of the bins, if he expected the body to be found, and the death blamed on the abductor, he didn't have to know. That the body wasn't found was a simple twist of fate.

Also, as I have said before,I don't believe the body was retrieved or spent anytime in the Scenic.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #62 on: June 26, 2013, 11:59:04 PM »
No, something that is totally illogical, doesn't work logistically doesn't have to be proven. I think you've also misunderstood where the burden of proof lies. It's on YOU, the accuser.

And I think you've mistaken this for a court of law.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #63 on: June 26, 2013, 11:59:20 PM »
What time did the bin truck pass every night Anne?
I'm not inventing this, DCI. They passed every night, except on Sunday. It's referred to in Searching for Madeleine: A Dispatches Special, 18 October 2007
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id49.html

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #64 on: June 27, 2013, 12:06:38 AM »
LOL Disused buildings where NOBODY looked in for THREE weeks? Pure fantasies.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #65 on: June 27, 2013, 12:08:36 AM »
LOL Disused buildings where NOBODY looked in for THREE weeks? Pure fantasies.
nier ce qui est, et expliquer ce qui n'est pas..

Offline faithlilly

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #66 on: June 27, 2013, 12:09:45 AM »
LOL Disused buildings where NOBODY looked in for THREE weeks? Pure fantasies.

It's possible though, I admit, not very probable. I favour the bin theory myself.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #67 on: June 27, 2013, 12:10:31 AM »
If I don't translate E.Allen Poe's words, Redblossom will not like it :
Deny what exists and explain what doesn't.

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #68 on: June 27, 2013, 12:10:46 AM »
nier ce qui est, et expliquer ce qui n'est pas..

Not applicable in this case though.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #69 on: June 27, 2013, 12:12:42 AM »
It's possible though, I admit, not very probable. I favour the bin theory myself.
Some theories just don't contemplate what it is, for a father, to hold in his arms the dead body of his adored daughter. This is terrible.

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #70 on: June 27, 2013, 12:13:05 AM »
I'm not inventing this, DCI. They passed every night, except on Sunday. It's referred to in Searching for Madeleine: A Dispatches Special, 18 October 2007
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id49.html

At what time though? Does anyone know?

Don't get me wrong here, I'm quite happy that you are finally willing to nail your colours to the mast here, it's been a long time coming.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #71 on: June 27, 2013, 12:13:56 AM »
Not applicable in this case though.
Applicable to Mrs McCann (read her book !) : For her reality is wrong.

Offline sadie

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #72 on: June 27, 2013, 12:15:20 AM »
Deleted.

Something went wrong with the post

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #73 on: June 27, 2013, 12:21:09 AM »
At what time though? Does anyone know?

Don't get me wrong here, I'm quite happy that you are finally willing to nail your colours to the mast here, it's been a long time coming.
No, Mrs. B, I've answered you immediately when you asked about the who, what, when, where why. Don't you remember ?
This is evidently only a possible scenario, I find it more challenging than the abduction by a stranger and on top of that from bed one, this one I find not insane but vulgar. 

Offline Mrs. B

Re: Re: The Amaral theory of what happened to Madeleine.
« Reply #74 on: June 27, 2013, 12:22:08 AM »
Applicable to Mrs McCann (read her book !) : For her reality is wrong.

No, her reality is real. Amaral on the other hand, seems to have a real problem with distinguishing what is real from what is not.