Author Topic: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved  (Read 19158 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #60 on: August 08, 2013, 11:44:00 AM »
Perhaps unlike you I don't have to rely on translations.

And as you say, devil's in the detail.

I am fully aware of what the Prosecutor was stating in that archival report.

Thats nice for you

Offline gilet

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #61 on: August 08, 2013, 11:50:28 AM »
Thats nice for you

Quite and for you a shame too, because you do seem to have to rely on these translations and that will never allow you to find the real truth about the contents of the files.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #62 on: August 08, 2013, 12:20:21 PM »
Quite and for you a shame too, because you do seem to have to rely on these translations and that will never allow you to find the real truth about the contents of the files.

Quite a generalising and sweeping statement
 @)(++(*

And what is in the files, so grossly mistranslated as you suggest,or not as the case may be, is not the only source of information in this case.

Offline gilet

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #63 on: August 08, 2013, 01:17:07 PM »
Quite a generalising and sweeping statement
 @)(++(*

And what is in the files, so grossly mistranslated as you suggest,or not as the case may be, is not the only source of information in this case.

So what are your other sources of facts about the case?

Don't tell me the news media?  Now that would be funny.

And don't tell me it is Amaral's books and interviews because that would be even funnier when the man himself told us that his purpose in writing was to defend his reputation as much as anything else.


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #64 on: August 08, 2013, 01:19:08 PM »
So what are your other sources of facts about the case?

Don't tell me the news media?  Now that would be funny.

And don't tell me it is Amaral's books and interviews because that would be even funnier when the man himself told us that his purpose in writing was to defend his reputation as much as anything else.

You cant be too good on reading and memory recall as I already ruled out those two sources on another thread
 @)(++(*


« Last Edit: August 08, 2013, 01:20:44 PM by Redblossom »

Offline gilet

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #65 on: August 08, 2013, 01:21:05 PM »
You cant be too good on reading and memory recall as I already ruled out those two sources
 @)(++(*

And you cannot be too clever about bluffing because it is you claiming to have other sources but you who are failing to tell the world what they might be.

I am just clarifying that you are not using those as sources.

Now what are these sources of facts about the case that you claim exist which might support your point of view?



Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #66 on: August 08, 2013, 01:26:00 PM »
And you cannot be too clever about bluffing because it is you claiming to have other sources but you who are failing to tell the world what they might be.

I am just clarifying that you are not using those as sources.

Now what are these sources of facts about the case that you claim exist which might support your point of view?

Are you debunkers twin?

there are many sources of information in this case, NONE of which are 100% wrong or right, some having more weight than others, just using your god given nous normally leads you in the right direction, and no I never claimed to have any sources of info that anyone else here has
 @)(++(*


Offline gilet

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #67 on: August 08, 2013, 02:24:15 PM »
Are you debunkers twin?

there are many sources of information in this case, NONE of which are 100% wrong or right, some having more weight than others, just using your god given nous normally leads you in the right direction, and no I never claimed to have any sources of info that anyone else here has
 @)(++(*

So you have failed to show us what you are talking about and prefer to post abuse towards me to hide your failure.

I didn't say you claimed any such thing. But you did claim that there are other sources which you have patently failed to list.


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #68 on: August 08, 2013, 03:22:52 PM »
So you have failed to show us what you are talking about and prefer to post abuse towards me to hide your failure.

I didn't say you claimed any such thing. But you did claim that there are other sources which you have patently failed to list.

So overdramatic as always. No one has to spell every single iota out for you when making comments. Its not hard to figure out that there are many sources of information on the case from which people glean what they do, thnk about it and make their own minds up


Its like spaghetti soup sometimes

Pj files
Print media
Radio interviews
Tv interviews
Magazine interviews
Documentaries
Editorial footage
Personal blogs,GMs that is and KMs book
Plethora of comment from laymen to professionals

That enough?

Offline sadie

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #69 on: August 08, 2013, 03:42:15 PM »
So overdramatic as always. No one has to spell every single iota out for you when making comments. Its not hard to figure out that there are many sources of information on the case from which people glean what they do, thnk about it and make their own minds up


Its like spaghetti soup sometimes

Pj files
Print media
Radio interviews
Tv interviews
Magazine interviews
Documentaries
Editorial footage
Personal blogs,GMs that is and KMs book
Plethora of comment from laymen to professionals

That enough?
So says the Drama Queen 8)-)))

Offline sadie

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #70 on: August 08, 2013, 03:45:14 PM »
So you have failed to show us what you are talking about and prefer to post abuse towards me to hide your failure.

I didn't say you claimed any such thing. But you did claim that there are other sources which you have patently failed to list.
Are you really unable to understand what gilet is commenting on?  Dooes it HAVE TO BE spelled out

Citations please for gilet

Offline gilet

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #71 on: August 08, 2013, 03:57:59 PM »
So overdramatic as always. No one has to spell every single iota out for you when making comments. Its not hard to figure out that there are many sources of information on the case from which people glean what they do, thnk about it and make their own minds up


Its like spaghetti soup sometimes

Pj files
Print media
Radio interviews
Tv interviews
Magazine interviews
Documentaries
Editorial footage
Personal blogs,GMs that is and KMs book
Plethora of comment from laymen to professionals

That enough?

It is quite revealing that you list all that lot as "evidence". Do you not realise how foolish that looks?


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #72 on: August 08, 2013, 04:58:52 PM »
It is quite revealing that you list all that lot as "evidence". Do you not realise how foolish that looks?

Abuse ignored, did I state everything contained in all those is evidence of x y z?  I said they are information sources!

Offline sadie

Re: After Six Years the Only Sign of Not Being Involved
« Reply #73 on: August 08, 2013, 05:25:45 PM »
So overdramatic as always. No one has to spell every single iota out for you when making comments. Its not hard to figure out that there are many sources of information on the case from which people glean what they do, thnk about it and make their own minds up


Its like spaghetti soup sometimes

Pj files
Print media
Radio interviews
Tv interviews
Magazine interviews
Documentaries
Editorial footage
Personal blogs,GMs that is and KMs book
Plethora of comment from laymen to professionals

That enough?

We all know these infirmation sources Red, but to go thru all those would take for ever .... and most are not reliable.

gilet asked for a citation, not a list of where you could look if you were barmy enough .... and had three weeks to spare