Why did Amaral and PJ suspect the McCanns and Murat as being somehow involved?

[sadie]

I am not at all suggesting that the McCanns gave her a drug, Sadie. That's not my logic.

I am saying that IF a drug was given (and I have no idea if it was ), 5pm would be a strange time for her parents to give it to her.

Admin,.... Why has my response been wiped?

Here you are insinuating that Kate and Gerry drugged her and killed her.  A theory how they got rid of the body is now needed.  Can you supply one? 

We have waited long enough for such a theory, but not one of the [ censored word ]s /sceptics has provided one.  I have looked at it evey which way .... as have thousands of others ... and it is impossible.  Also implausible.

If any drugging went on, it happened at tea-time ... or immediately before cos Madeleine was soooo tired that she had to be carried.  Maybe the twins were very tired too?  ....  we just dont know.  They were all too tired to go for their usual routine bedtime play on the slide with the other children; thatwe do know.


So....

Can you please come up with a possible and plausible method that they used to dispose of Madeleies body?
You are good at theories, Sherlock .... altho I have to tell you that I have been told that a very similar theory was around before. 

That doesn't make it incorrect tho

Cheers

[sadie]

Just checked. From eastern european family origins but lives in flitwick.

Now chain of events.

gm is 'distracted' by young lady.

km is a bit miffed.

Subsequently they row.

Don't talk much and sleep in separate bedrooms.

Both inadvertently give Madeleine something to help her sleep.

Hypothetical of course.

Trouble is  .... the days are wrong for that to have happened..  The young lady event was on the Tuesday ....and Madeleine was abducted on the Thursday.  Are you insinuating that Kate and Gerry didn't talk for 48 hours?
Nah, I dont think that is right somehow.


Maybe Stephen, you could help Sherlock with a new theory as mentioined in the previous post.  That would be good

[stephen25000]

Trouble is  .... the days are wrong for that to have happened..  The young lady event was on the Tuesday ....and Madeleine was abducted on the Thursday.  Are you insinuating that Kate and Gerry didn't talk for 48 hours?
Nah, I dont think that is right somehow.


Maybe Stephen, you could help Sherlock with a new theory as mentioined in the previous post.  That would be good

1 event can follow another.

I did not say they didn't talk.

If km was angry with her hubby and in the circumstances, and it festered.......................................

[ferryman]

It's unheard of that married couples have disagreements.

When they do, that usually means one, other or both have done something fiendish and dastardly to one or other of the children ...

[stephen25000]

It's unheard of that married couples have disagreements.

When they do, that usually means one, other or both have done something fiendish and dastardly to one or other of the children ...

Tell me 'ferryman'.

If your other half was  was gawping at a young woman's accoutrements would you be a bit miffed ?

[Chinagirl]

This is nothing but salacious speculation.  How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that the quiz lady being invited to their table happened on the TUESDAY?  Also, there is nothing to indicate that the minor falling out between Kate and Gerry had anything to do with that event.

[stephen25000]

This is nothing but salacious speculation.  How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that the quiz lady being invited to their table happened on the TUESDAY?  Also, there is nothing to indicate that the minor falling out between Kate and Gerry had anything to do with that event.

I have given a possible chain of events.

If you don't like it, well that's just tough.

[sadie]

Tell me 'ferryman'.

If your other half was  was gawping at a young woman's accoutrements would you be a bit miffed ?

Well,as a bloke who presumably would be married to a woman, Ferryman would be a bit shocked if his wife was gawping at another womans accoutrements, dont you think !

 

[stephen25000]

Well,as a bloke who presumably would be married to a woman, Ferryman would be a bit shocked if his wife was gawping at another womans accoutrements, dont you think !

 

How do we know ferryman is a bloke ? >@@(*&)

[sadie]

I have given a possible chain of events.

If you don't like it, well that's just tough.

Where where?

Oh I have got it.  just your imagination and, if I may say so, nasty suspicious mind at work.  Merely tittle-tattle.   No nuts and bolts, just your fantasy.

How about giving a real chain of events Stephen?    You know, the kind that proves they dunit.

[stephen25000]

Where where?

Oh I have got it.  just your imagination and, if I may say so, nasty suspicious mind at work.  Merely tittle-tattle.   No nuts and bolts, just your fantasy.

How about giving a real chain of events Stephen?    You know, the kind that proves they dunit.

Like yours ? 

[sadie]

Like yours ? 

Give it a go Stephen

See if you can produce a valid scenario.

Mine could be valid, but may not be. 


Give it a go, try it and see if you can make anything of it.




PS Fine set of teeth you have.  Like your gold teeth.  Do you have a diamond earing as well?

[stephen25000]

Give it a go Stephen

See if you can produce a valid scenario.

Mine could be valid, but may not be. 


Give it a go, try it and see if you can make anything of it.




PS Fine set of teeth you have.  Like your gold teeth.  Do you have a diamond earing as well?

You accuse others of abuse.

Your post has been reported.

[sadie]

You accuse others of abuse.

Your post has been reported.

How is that abuse Stephen?  You flash your gold teeth at me.   Am I not allowed to comment?

Some might say that the sneering image at me was abuse.  Angelo apologised after he had done that to me.  Said "it was an accident, he didn't mean to do it", if you remember .. and apologised.

Relax Stephen.  You take yourself too seriously !

[Lyall]

A "valid scenario"?

You know it's impossible without being defamatory.

It's easy for you to come up with theories about unnamed abductors and international organisations and OC employees etc. - you don't name anybody so you can play with theories all day. And you do it seems.

It's obviously not possible for us to speculate without using names is it.