For Those Who Say It's Not Possible To Committ a Crime and Lie For 6 Years.

[Rachel Granada]

That is irrelevant. the OP is clearly an example for those who say it cant be possible for anyone to lie for so  long if they committed a crime. The OP demonstrates they can and do.

However, the OP has not seen fit to elaborate on exactly what crime the McCanns have been "lying about" for the past 6 years.

If we don't know what they are supposed to have committed, we can't move the discussion forward, IMO.

[Redblossom]

Well there we go. A poster commenting without even bothering to read the link.

No wonder some people fail to get to the truth if they cannot even be bothered to read the links provided.

Irrelevent in the context of the subject.

[Redblossom]

However, the OP has not seen fit to elaborate on exactly what crime the McCanns have been "lying about" for the past 6 years.

If we don't know what they are supposed to have committed, we can't move the discussion forward, IMO.

I think the gist, as I said before, is that it destroys the perception that people cannot lie for years or own up if they were involved in a crime, thats all. Food for thought. No need to turn it into anything else, its an observation and a valid one.

[gilet]

Irrelevent in the context of the subject.

This gets more ridiculous. A poster claiming it is irrelevant to read the link when the OP consists 100% of that link.

No wonder some people don't get the issues. They simply cannot be bothered to read and pronounce reading the link utterly irrelevant.

[gilet]

I think the gist, as I said before, is that it destroys the perception that people cannot lie for years or own up if they were involved in a crime, thats all. Food for thought. No need to turn it into anything else, its an observation and a valid one.

No it is not a valid observation at all as you would know if you had even bothered to open the link. There is no similarity between this case in the news and the McCann case.

When posters make claims without bothering to read the links provided then is it any wonder that they cannot debate properly?

[Redblossom]

try some chamomile gilet and a lava lamp, does wonders, meanwhile read back, I answered Rachel and that is not that hard go comprehend, chow

[gilet]

try some chamomile gilet and a lava lamp, does wonders, meanwhile read back, I answered Rachel and that is not that hard go comprehend, chow

I have explained that there is no similarity between this case and that of the man who had been convicted of a crime but protested his innocence. For example in the McCann case it would require 9 people to remain silent for six years, not one. For example the man was convicted, not as in the McCanns case people against whom there is no evidence and who are not even regarded as suspects. And so on.

The fact that you could not be bothered to read the link given means that you simply did not know this before making your comments. A great shame.

[Albertini]

Hang on a second the original poster made no allegations of a crime in their original post against the McCann's or anyone else.

All Faith said was it is possible, and there is evidence, of people lying for years to conceal a crime.

If the family supporter's chose to ask Faith what crime the McCann's have committed i suggest they open a thread regarding that subject and then it's up to Faith to deicde if she wants to post.

But this thread and indeed the OP had nothing to do with what alleged crime the Mccann's had committed.

[Jazzy]

Hang on a second the original poster made no allegations of a crime in their original post against the McCann's or anyone else.

All Faith said was it is possible, and there is evidence, of people lying for years to conceal a crime.

If the family supporter's chose to ask Faith what crime the McCann's have committed i suggest they open a thread regarding that subject and then it's up to Faith to deicde if she wants to post.

But this thread and indeed the OP had nothing to do with what alleged crime the Mccann's had committed.

So what is this thread about then? A Burglar who stabbed an elderly lady to death, got convicted of it, denied it and then went, "You know what, I did do it" 12 years later?  Parole leaps to mind here.

So what did Faithlilly say? What is the point? Why would someone with her clearly expressed views draw a parallel between a s..mbag thief who stabbed an old lady and the parents of a missing child?


What was her [ censored word ] point?


Again, what crime, exactly was she implying the Mccanns are lying about?

[Jazzy]

I think the gist, as I said before, is that it destroys the perception that people cannot lie for years or own up if they were involved in a crime, thats all. Food for thought. No need to turn it into anything else, its an observation and a valid one.

It's a trawl through news stories, as you say, completely irrelevant but twisted to have a go at the parents of a missing child. Nothing changes ever, this has no link to the Mccanns, this s..mbag is a burglar who stabbed an old lady to death. It destroys nothing but the credibility of the person who posted it.

[Albertini]

So what is this thread about then? A Burglar who stabbed an elderly lady to death, got convicted of it, denied it and then went, "You know what, I did do it" 12 years later?  Parole leaps to mind here.

The thread is about whether people are capable of lying to cover up a crime. The OP found evidence it was.

So what did Faithlilly say? What is the point? Why would someone with her clearly expressed views draw a parallel between a s..mbag thief who stabbed an old lady and the parents of a missing child?

She said exactly as i said above.

What was her [ censored word ] point?

"[ censored word ]" Lol! The languauge of the Mccann supporters! it always makes me chuckle. "[ censored word ]" "forkers" "[ censored word ]s" sock puppets".

How old are you? 11?

Her point is that people lie to cover crimes and that it is not an impossibilty for that to happen.

Again, what crime, exactly was she implying the Mccanns are lying about?

There is no implication, you chave simply chosen one to get yourself all in a lather.

[Jazzy]

The thread is about whether people are capable of lying to cover up a crime. The OP found evidence it was.

She said exactly as i said above.


"[ censored word ]" Lol! The languauge of the Mccann supporters! it always makes me chuckle. "[ censored word ]" "forkers" "[ censored word ]s" sock puppets".

How old are you? 11?

Her point is that people lie to cover crimes and that it is not an impossibilty for that to happen.


There is no implication, you chave simply chosen one to get yourself all in a lather.

Is that right? It's a newsflash is it? People lie about crimes they have in fact committed? They actually do say, "It wasn't me"? Is that new information for you? Wrongdoers denying it?

Again, a [ censored word ] posting that in a discussion forum dedicated to the Mccann case, is implying what?

Faithlilly is implying that the burglar who murdered an old lady , denied it for years, and then admitted it, is relevant to the Mccanns because they killed their child, and also denied it.

[south of the river]

the guy was found guilty and sent down - but he refused to admit his crime - there are loads of cases where the guilty party goes to jail and then refuses ever to either admit or reveal details to police

Robert Black , Myra Hindley two that spring to mind.

If the guy had been chief suspect - but never charged  and no evidence and spent 10 years in public eye urging to police to find the killer , then suddenly admitted guilt it would certainly be a story

This is just a convicted killer who refused to admit publicly his guilt - there are plenty ion prison like that !

[Jazzy]

the guy was found guilty and sent down - but he refused to admit his crime - there are loads of cases where the guilty party goes to jail and then refuses ever to either admit or reveal details to police

Robert Black , Myra Hindley two that spring to mind.

If the guy had been chief suspect - but never charged  and no evidence and spent 10 years in public eye urging to police to find the killer , then suddenly admitted guilt it would certainly be a story

This is just a convicted killer who refused to admit publicly his guilt - there are plenty ion prison like that !

Absolutely right!

[Lace]

I haven't seen this guy on tv,  declaring his innocence.    Does the world know about him?   Most people know about the McCann's    they have gone on tv and declared their innocence.

As has already been said this guy was sent down for the crime,  he was found GUILTY all he did was say he was innocent, but he was found to be guilty.