Author Topic: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?  (Read 25321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sadie

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2013, 04:15:18 PM »
The 'anti' as you call us don't have a missing child we're supposedly trying to find.

No you prefer to believe and  support a crooked PJ Officer.  One who is a proven liar.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2013, 04:32:38 PM »
No you prefer to believe and  support a crooked PJ Officer.  One who is a proven liar.

I neither believe Amaral unquestionably nor support him.i In fact if the truth being known I am as angry as you are with Amaral for the mistakes made while carrying out the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance, though obviously for different reasons.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2013, 04:39:17 PM »
What was the exact question put to Gerry?

"When questioned about whether the couple's and the children's life was peaceful, namely regarding the work that three children can give a couple, as well as the stress this can cause, he replies that in fact since the birth of the twins their life has been very busy, and that especially during the twins' first year life was difficult. He states that since the twins were born, he and Kate have gone out in the evening only once, leaving the children with relatives. He adds that in spite of this he never saw Kate depressed as a result of too much work. He denies that Kate changed her work habits for reasons related to depression. He asserts that his wife never suggested to him that at some time she had the intention of handing Madeleine into the care of a family member."

Can't you just imagine what questions were being asked, when you see it, in context?
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 04:41:39 PM by DCI »
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2013, 04:43:59 PM »
"When questioned about whether the couple's and the children's life was peaceful, namely regarding the work that three children can give a couple, as well as the stress this can cause, he replies that in fact since the birth of the twins their life has been very busy, and that especially during the twins' first year life was difficult. He states that since the twins were born, he and Kate have gone out in the evening only once, leaving the children with relatives. He adds that in spite of this he never saw Kate depressed as a result of too much work. He denies that Kate changed her work habits for reasons related to depression. He asserts that his wife never suggested to him that at some time she had the intention of handing Madeleine into the care of a family member."

Can't you just imagine what questions were being asked, when you see it, in context?

It doesn't matter why, what matters is Gerry's answer. Please stop trying to deflect.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2013, 05:07:39 PM »
Twisted?   How?

They are saying they only left Madeleine with relatives once since the twins were born.

Madeleine by the look of it was usually baby sat in the house by the couple.

The babysitter said she sat for them every two months but Gerry said it only happened once.  Who is the consummate liar?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2013, 05:12:09 PM »
No you prefer to believe and  support a crooked PJ Officer.  One who is a proven liar.

It just doesn't work putting all the blame on Amaral, the majority of the Portimao PJ as well as those seconded from HQ in Lisbon were of the same opinion Sadie otherwise the McCanns would not have been brought in and designated as official suspects.

Had the DNA results been positive or more conclusive than they were I believe the next step was to arrest and charge them.  Skin of their teeth is a term which comes to mind.   8(0(*
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 05:15:37 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2013, 05:18:46 PM »
It just doesn't work putting all the blame on Amaral, the majority of the Portimao PJ as well as those seconded from HQ in Lisbon were of the same opinion Sadie otherwise the McCanns would not have been brought in and designated as official suspects.

Had the DNA results been positive or more conclusive than they were I believe the next step was to arrest and charge them.  Skin of their teeth is a term which comes to mind.   8(0(*

In a nutshell Angelo.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Angelo222

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2013, 05:19:25 PM »
"When questioned about whether the couple's and the children's life was peaceful, namely regarding the work that three children can give a couple, as well as the stress this can cause, he replies that in fact since the birth of the twins their life has been very busy, and that especially during the twins' first year life was difficult. He states that since the twins were born, he and Kate have gone out in the evening only once, leaving the children with relatives. He adds that in spite of this he never saw Kate depressed as a result of too much work. He denies that Kate changed her work habits for reasons related to depression. He asserts that his wife never suggested to him that at some time she had the intention of handing Madeleine into the care of a family member."

Can't you just imagine what questions were being asked, when you see it, in context?

An honest and an innocent person will always be able to answer immediately and truthfully any questions put to them.

Hesitation, changing ones story and refusing to answer the simplest questions is a sign of guilt. Unfortunate but true!!
« Last Edit: August 18, 2013, 05:22:05 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Lace

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2013, 05:37:02 PM »
The babysitter said she sat for them every two months but Gerry said it only happened once.  Who is the consummate liar?

Gerry said he only left Madeleine once with relatives.   If he had meant all the children he would have said so.

He only left Madeleine once with relatives,  all the other times she stayed in the house and the baby sitters came to her.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2013, 05:43:12 PM »

What difference does this make anyway Faithfully?
A freudian slip that depicts you rather well, Faithlilly !

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2013, 05:43:41 PM »
Gerry said he only left Madeleine once with relatives.   If he had meant all the children he would have said so.

He only left Madeleine once with relatives,  all the other times she stayed in the house and the baby sitters came to her.

Do you believe catergorically every word gm utters ?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2013, 05:45:39 PM »
 
A freudian slip that depicts you rather well, Faithlilly !

 ?{)(**
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2013, 05:46:01 PM »
 He states that since the twins were born, he and Kate have gone out in the evening only once, leaving the children with relatives. He adds that in spite of this he never saw Kate depressed as a result of too much work.

Offline Lace

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #28 on: August 18, 2013, 05:48:37 PM »
Do you believe catergorically every word gm utters ?

I am answering a question by Faithfully Stephen.

It is how I understand what was said.

If you notice the word is 'relatives'  with an 's'  not 'relative' as in one relative.  So the fact that one of the baby sitters is a relative is beside the point.

He is saying he has only left Madeleine with relatives once since the twins were born.  'Madeleine' not all three children,  left with relatives with an s only once since the twins were born.

 

Offline Lace

Re: Can Anyone See a Problem With These Statements ?
« Reply #29 on: August 18, 2013, 05:53:52 PM »
Ok  I stand corrected he only left the children with relatives with an s since the twins were born.

Leaving the children with relatives in my opinion is taking them to the relatives house.