Author Topic: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.  (Read 47445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline VIXTE

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #120 on: February 23, 2014, 02:01:19 AM »
I don't remember percentages being quoted by the FSS?   Can you provide the cite please?

You don't have to be dead to leave DNA around btw.

As Madeleine inherited her DNA from her parents, then if their DNA was in the car which is highly likely - it would obviously produce the same components as in Madeleine's DNA.    There could also be components of other family members DNA present in the sample.

I believe there were 37 components in total found in the sample - not 19 as some people keep trying to claim.

Quote
From Lowes report: A complex LCN DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people was obtained from cellular material recovered from the luggage compartment section 286C 2007 CRL10 (2) area 2. Within the DNA profile of Madeline McCann there are 20 DNA components represented by 19 peaks on a chart. At one of the areas of DNA we routinely examine Madeleine has inherited the same DNA component from both parents; this appears therefore as 1 peak rather than 2, hence 19 rather than 20. Of these 19 components 15 are present within the result from this item; there are 37 components in total. There are 37 components because there are at least 3 contributors; but there could be up to five contributors. In my opinion therefore this result is too complex for meaningful interpretation/inclusion.

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #121 on: February 23, 2014, 02:02:22 AM »
I don't remember percentages being quoted by the FSS?   Can you provide the cite please?

You don't have to be dead to leave DNA around btw.

As Madeleine inherited her DNA from her parents, then if their DNA was in the car which is highly likely - it would obviously produce the same components as in Madeleine's DNA.    There could also be components of other family members DNA present in the sample.

I believe there were 37 components in total found in the sample - not 19 as some people keep trying to claim.

How about providing a cite for your own bizarre theories?

Where is the FSS report stating the DNA located at the cadaver sites is definitely NOT Madeleine?

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #122 on: February 23, 2014, 02:03:11 AM »
How about providing a cite for your own bizarre theories?

Where is the FSS report stating the DNA located at the cadaver sites is definitely NOT Madeleine?

It does not exist

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #123 on: February 23, 2014, 02:05:06 AM »
It does not exist

Precisely.

It doesn't exist.

I bet my house they could exclude me though - and you and 99% of posters on this board.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #124 on: February 23, 2014, 02:12:35 AM »
15 alleles on 19 matched hers. Had they been 19 that would have been certain.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2014, 02:15:21 AM by AnneGuedes »

Offline VIXTE

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #125 on: February 23, 2014, 02:14:05 AM »
How about providing a cite for your own bizarre theories?

Where is the FSS report stating the DNA located at the cadaver sites is definitely NOT Madeleine?

OK.. can you point out a link where the FSS states that any DNA profile obtained from the sites is Madeleine's?
Or possibly Madeleine's?

I can help you.. here is Lowe's report:
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id268.html

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #126 on: February 23, 2014, 02:22:59 AM »
OK.. can you point out a link where the FSS states that any DNA profile obtained from the sites is Madeleine's?
Or possibly Madeleine's?

I can help you.. here is Lowe's report:
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id268.html

You first.


Offline VIXTE

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #127 on: February 23, 2014, 02:25:11 AM »
You first.

Well, I already posted mine.

Now it is up to you to prove your statements!

Offline Benice

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #128 on: February 23, 2014, 02:28:05 AM »
How about providing a cite for your own bizarre theories?

Where is the FSS report stating the DNA located at the cadaver sites is definitely NOT Madeleine?

It is you making the claims  - so it's up to you to provide the evidence to back them up.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #129 on: February 23, 2014, 02:30:04 AM »
Well, I already posted mine.

Now it is up to you to prove your statements!

I have no problem proving that the DNA tested did not exclude Madeleine.

Its black and white.  There is no such report.

If there was Team McCann would have thrust it down our throats by now.

Offline VIXTE

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #130 on: February 23, 2014, 02:33:13 AM »
I have no problem proving that the DNA tested did not exclude Madeleine.

Its black and white.  There is no such report.

If there was Team McCann would have thrust it down our throats by now.

Please post the link.

Otherwise you sound like a delusional politician..

Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #131 on: February 23, 2014, 02:35:50 AM »
Please post the link.

Otherwise you sound like a delusional politician..

I cannot post a link to a report that doesn't exist.

You are the one claiming the DNA exonerates the McCann, not I.


Silkywhiskers

  • Guest
Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #132 on: February 23, 2014, 10:24:52 PM »
Eddie told us she died in 5a.

Now the media trained BHH has used the word "murder" for the first time ever.

Is he the most senior officer in Britain?  Yes. Is his job largely a figurehead, a political position which requires him to be the Face of SY in public? Yes.

Do police know a lot more about crimes and evidence than we do?   Yes.

If BHH tosses off the word murder it is not a slip of the tongue.  He's been around the block, had hours of media training.

Murder.......! Not manslaughter or homicide, but Murder.

That tells me that they have evidence of intentional killing.

Ugh.......

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #133 on: February 23, 2014, 10:32:47 PM »
Eddie told us she died in 5a.

Now the media trained BHH has used the word "murder" for the first time ever.

Is he the most senior officer in Britain?  Yes. Is his job largely a figurehead, a political position which requires him to be the Face of SY in public? Yes.

Do police know a lot more about crimes and evidence than we do?   Yes.

If BHH tosses off the word murder it is not a slip of the tongue.  He's been around the block, had hours of media training.

Murder.......! Not manslaughter or homicide, but Murder.

That tells me that they have evidence of intentional killing.

Ugh.......

when did you speak to eddie

Offline VIXTE

Re: The DNA results used to implicate the McCanns revisited.
« Reply #134 on: February 23, 2014, 10:35:49 PM »
Eddie told us she died in 5a.


No, 'he' never..